Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
One complication of liver disease is the buildup of fluid within the belly. This is known as ascites. Patients who have ascites have a decreased appetite, pain, nausea and shortness of breath. Ascites is typically treated with medications, however when that does not work, patients need a procedure where a needle is inserted in the belly every few weeks to drain the excess fluid. About 2 in 5 patients with ascites from liver failure can get kidney disease from their worsening liver function or from the drainage of fluid with needles. Once patients have both advanced liver disease and kidney disease, their chance of dying largely increases. The present study will be the first of its kind to study a new technique to treat ascites. Investigators are planning to place a tube in a patient's belly to drain the excessive amounts of fluid. This technique is similar to how one type of dialysis is done to treat patients with kidney failure. This study is set as a pilot investigation in order to determine the feasibility of doing a larger, randomized clinical trial investigating the use of this novel technique. Importantly, advanced liver disease patients are at high risk to develop kidney disease, and therefore are an important group to focus on. Investigators believe that this technique will prevent or slow the development of kidney disease in liver failure patients, and improve their quality of life, far more than the current available treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedApril 22, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.3 years
November 22, 2016
April 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the physical component of Quality of Life
Change in the physical component summary score of the SF 36 questionnaire.
2 months post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Catheter Insertion Technical Success Rate
Day of insertion of PD catheter
PD Catheter Survival
Number of days between catheter insertion and possible complication, up to 6 months
PD Catheter Related Complications Frequency
through study completion, up to 6 months
Large Volume Paracentesis Complications Frequency
through study completion, up to 6 months
Participant Self-Reported Health Status
0,2,4 and 6 months
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion
EXPERIMENTALCatheters will be inserted at the bedside in a special procedure room.Argyle PD catheter kits will be used:2 cuffed curled catheters at 57cm or 62cm lengths. At time of PD catheter insertion,most patients will be drained of 5-10L of ascites or more to decrease the chance of catheter leaks.The volume removed will be at sole discretion of physician doing the procedure.Patients will be administered 25% Human Serum Albumin injection: 100cc after the 5-10L drainage,and 200cc if 10-15L is removed.Patients will undergo an initial drain and training with a specialized nurse.Patients in this arm will be instructed to drain a maximum of 2L per day after the initial drain.Monthly bloodwork will be performed.
Large Volume Paracentesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm of the study will continue their usual practice of LVP as required. They will continue to undergo their LVP procedures through their regular means.Monthly bloodwork will be performed.
Interventions
Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in order to drain access fluid within the belly for patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Insertion of a needle into the peritoneal cavity where ascites accumulates, then attaching the needle to a collection system that drains the ascites by gravity. This procedure is part of the standard care for the treatment of refractory ascites.
Patients will be given Human Serum Albumin after the initial drain of ascites fluid: 100cc for 5-10L drainage, 200cc for 10-15L drainage.
Monthly bloodwork will be done as part of usual standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and non-pregnant females greater than 18 years of age.
- Liver cirrhosis as defined by a histological, clinical, or radiological criteria
- Patients with refractory non-malignant ascites requiring 2 or more LVPs in the last 4 months.
- No contraindication for bedside PD catheter insertion (e.g. prior major abdominal surgery, ostomies, large hernias, bleeding diatheses, inability to lie flat).
- Patients having a support person (family member/friend/caregiver, etc) willing to go through training and help with catheter care.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior liver transplant
- Is actively being worked up for liver transplant or is already on the liver transplant waitlist
- Current SBP (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) defined as polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count of \>250 cells/mm3 in the ascites or positive bacteria in ascitic cultures
- Malignant ascites
- Severe coagulopathy with either an INR (international normalized ratio) \> 1.5, a platelet count \< 50 x 109/L that is not able to be reversed at time of PD catheter insertion
- Any previous episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
- Loculated ascites
- Known presence of HIV/AIDS
- Immunomodulatory treatments used within the last 4 months
- Expected survival \<6 months and/or MELD (The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score \> 30
- Hepatic Encephalopathy episode requiring hospital admission in the past 6 months.
- History of non-compliance or suspected failure to comply with study requirements
- Allergies to Vancomycin and Cephalosporins.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4, Canada
Related Publications (15)
Senousy BE, Draganov PV. Evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan 7;15(1):67-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.67.
PMID: 19115470BACKGROUNDPlanas R, Montoliu S, Balleste B, Rivera M, Miquel M, Masnou H, Galeras JA, Gimenez MD, Santos J, Cirera I, Morillas RM, Coll S, Sola R. Natural history of patients hospitalized for management of cirrhotic ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Nov;4(11):1385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.08.007.
PMID: 17081806BACKGROUNDSinghal S, Baikati KK, Jabbour II, Anand S. Management of refractory ascites. Am J Ther. 2012 Mar;19(2):121-32. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181ff7a8b.
PMID: 21192246BACKGROUNDRunyon BA; AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009 Jun;49(6):2087-107. doi: 10.1002/hep.22853. No abstract available.
PMID: 19475696BACKGROUNDVan Thiel DH, Moore CM, Garcia M, George M, Nadir A. Continuous peritoneal drainage of large-volume ascites. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2723-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1792-x. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
PMID: 21735084BACKGROUNDPeltekian KM, Wong F, Liu PP, Logan AG, Sherman M, Blendis LM. Cardiovascular, renal, and neurohumoral responses to single large-volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-resistant ascites. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):394-9.
PMID: 9068457BACKGROUNDLungren MP, Kim CY, Stewart JK, Smith TP, Miller MJ. Tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter placement for refractory ascites: single-center experience in 188 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PMID: 23876552BACKGROUNDSavin MA, Kirsch MJ, Romano WJ, Wang SK, Arpasi PJ, Mazon CD. Peritoneal ports for treatment of intractable ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000147082.05392.2B.
PMID: 15758132BACKGROUNDTapping CR, Ling L, Razack A. PleurX drain use in the management of malignant ascites: safety, complications, long-term patency and factors predictive of success. Br J Radiol. 2012 May;85(1013):623-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/24538524. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
PMID: 21427184BACKGROUNDBarnett TD, Rubins J. Placement of a permanent tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter for palliation of malignant ascites: a simplified percutaneous approach. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Apr;13(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61740-0.
PMID: 11932368BACKGROUNDBelfort MA, Stevens PJ, DeHaek K, Soeters R, Krige JE. A new approach to the management of malignant ascites; a permanently implanted abdominal drain. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1990 Feb;16(1):47-53.
PMID: 1689678BACKGROUNDMonsky WL, Yoneda KY, MacMillan J, Deutsch LS, Dong P, Hourigan H, Schwartz Y, Magee S, Duffield C, Boak T, Cernilia J. Peritoneal and pleural ports for management of refractory ascites and pleural effusions: assessment of impact on patient quality of life and hospice/home nursing care. J Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;12(9):811-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0061.
PMID: 19622018BACKGROUNDFleming ND, Alvarez-Secord A, Von Gruenigen V, Miller MJ, Abernethy AP. Indwelling catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites: a systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Sep;38(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.09.008. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
PMID: 19328648BACKGROUNDNessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV, Oliver MJ, Na Y, Perl J. The impact of transfer from hemodialysis on peritoneal dialysis technique survival. Perit Dial Int. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):297-305. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00147. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
PMID: 24293665BACKGROUNDWong F. Management of ascites in cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jan;27(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06925.x.
PMID: 21916992BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Komenda, MD
University of Manitoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2016
First Posted
November 29, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share