SPI-directed Analgesia for Vitreoretinal Surgeries
SPIVS
Influence of Surgical Pleth Index-guided Analgesia Using Different Techniques on the Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Vitreoretinal Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: Randomised, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
176
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized trial is to assess the efficacy of SPI-directed analgesia for vitreoretinal surgeries (VRS), presence of PONV and oculocardiac reflex (OCR) and compare Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) for monitoring pain perception postoperatively. Patients received general anaesthesia alone or combined with either preemptive analgesia using topical solution of 0,5% proxymetacaine or peribulbar block (0,5% bupivacaine with 2% lidokaine) or preemptive intravenous infusion of 1,0 g of metamizol or preemptive intravenous infusion of acetaminophen in a doseof 10-15mg/kg of body weight.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
July 1, 2017
1 year
November 22, 2016
January 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
pain perception intraoperatively
The investigators will compare the efficacy of analgesia intraoperatively according to technique of analgesia used preoperatively. The investigators will administer a rescue dose of fentanyl intravenously in a dose of 1 mcg per kg of body weight in the case when SPI value increases over 15 points in SPI scale every 5 minutes until SPI value decreases back to baseline value. Additionally, the investigators will analyse rescue fentanyl consumption in abovementioned groups
intraoperatively
oculocardiac reflex rate
The investigators will compare the rate of presence of OCR intraoperatively in studied groups
intraoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
pain perception postoperatively
up to one hour after discharge to postoperative unit.
PONV
up to one hour
Study Arms (5)
metamizol
EXPERIMENTALanalgesic drug
acetaminophen
EXPERIMENTALanalgesic drug
0,5 % bupivacaine with of 2% lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALa volume of 5 ml of analgesic solution for regional peribulbar block
Proxymetacaine
EXPERIMENTALtopical analgesia
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORpatients will receive no pre-emptive analgesia. standard doses of fentanyl will be used intraoperatively.
Interventions
in group A patients will receive pre-emptive analgesia using intravenous infusion of metamizol in a single dose of 1-1,25 gram
in group P patients will receive pre-emptive analgesia using intravenous infusion of acetaminophen in a single dose of 10-15 mg per kg of body weight
in group PBB patients in group BF will receive regional peribulbar block using a solution of 0,5% bupivacaine (2,5 ml) with 2% lidocaine (2,5 ml)
in group T patients will receive topical analgesia using a solution of 0,5% Alcaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- written consent to participate in the study
- written consent to undergo general anaesthesia alone or combined with different techniques of pre-emptive analgesia and vitreoretinal surgery
You may not qualify if:
- history of allergy to local anaesthetics or metamizole
- necessity of administration of vasoactive drugs influencing SPI monitoring
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Silesialead
- Silesian University of Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Silesia
Sosnowiec, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-200, Poland
Related Publications (16)
Mandelcorn M, Taback N, Mandelcorn E, Ananthanarayan C. Risk factors for pain and nausea following retinal and vitreous surgery under conscious sedation. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999 Aug;34(5):281-5.
PMID: 10486687BACKGROUNDGruenewald M, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Thee C, Steinfath M, Bein B. Measurement of the nociceptive balance by Analgesia Nociception Index and Surgical Pleth Index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 May;81(5):480-9. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
PMID: 25032676RESULTGruenewald M, Ilies C, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Fudickar A, Hocker J, Bein B. Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23471754RESULTGruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception-anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;27(2):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2013.06.007.
PMID: 24012235RESULTGruenewald M, Willms S, Broch O, Kott M, Steinfath M, Bein B. Sufentanil administration guided by surgical pleth index vs standard practice during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):898-905. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet485. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
PMID: 24535604RESULTJaichandran VV, Raman R, Gella L, Sharma T. Local anesthetic agents for vitreoretinal surgery: no advantage to mixing solutions. Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):1030-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
PMID: 25582785RESULTGhali AM. The efficacy of 0.75% levobupivacaine versus 0.75% ropivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia in vitreoretinal surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;6(1):22-6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.93050.
PMID: 22412772RESULTBahcecioglu H, Unal M, Artunay O, Rasier R, Sarici A. Posterior vitrectomy under topical anesthesia. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;42(2):272-7.
PMID: 17392852RESULTSeidenari P, Santin G, Milani P, David A. Peribulbar and retrobulbar combined anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery using ropivacaine. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar-Apr;16(2):295-9. doi: 10.1177/112067210601600216.
PMID: 16703549RESULTEberhart LH, Morin AM, Hoerle S, Wulf H, Geldner G. Droperidol and dolasetron alone or in combination for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2004 Aug;111(8):1569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.031.
PMID: 15288990RESULTSubramaniam R, Subbarayudu S, Rewari V, Singh RP, Madan R. Usefulness of pre-emptive peribulbar block in pediatric vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):43-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50032.
PMID: 12567343RESULTFekrat S, Elsing SH, Raja SC, Campochiaro PA, de Juan E Jr, Haller JA. Eye pain after vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective study of 185 patients. Retina. 2001;21(6):627-32. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200112000-00010.
PMID: 11756886RESULTCalenda E, Olle P, Muraine M, Brasseur G. Peribulbar anesthesia and sub-Tenon injection for vitreoretinal surgery: 300 cases. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000 Apr;78(2):196-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002196.x.
PMID: 10794256RESULTSajedi P, Nejad MS, Montazeri K, Baloochestani E. Comparing the preventive effect of 2 percent topical lidocaine and intravenous atropine on oculocardiac reflex in ophthalmological surgeries under general anesthesia. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;4(11):1258-65.
PMID: 24404359RESULTCalenda E, Quintyn JC, Brasseur G. Peribulbar anaesthesia using a combination of lidocaine, bupivocaine and clonidine in vitreoretinal surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;50(3):205-8.
PMID: 12355695RESULTPage MA, Fraunfelder FW. Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel as a topical ocular anesthetic for use in ophthalmic procedures. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:601-9. doi: 10.2147/opth.s4935. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
PMID: 19898665RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2016
First Posted
November 25, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
article in European Journal of Anaesthesiology in 2018, case reports