Laryngeal Reinnervation Versus Thyroplasty in Patients With Vocal Fold Weakness.
VOCALIST
Does Laryngeal Reinnervation or Type I Thyroplasty Give Better Voice Results for Patients With Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis (VOCALIST): a Feasibility Study.
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to help determine the most effective treatment for participants with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. There are currently two types of operations used to treat this condition. One operation is called thyroplasty. Doctors place a small piece of safe plastic into the side of the participant's voice box to push the weak vocal cord into a position to enable better speech and swallowing. In the other operation called laryngeal reinnervation, doctors repair the neck nerve supply to the vocal cord using parts of other unaffected nerves to enable better speech and swallowing. The investigators do not know which of these methods is better and are conducting this study to start comparing the two operations so that a larger clinical trial can be conducted in the future to tell us which operation is best.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started May 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2018
CompletedMay 29, 2018
May 1, 2018
2 years
November 3, 2016
May 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Whether the participant was randomised (yes/no)
From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant was randomised (yes/no)
24 months
Whether the participant successfully received the allocated operation (yes/no)
From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant successfully received the allocated operation (yes/no)
24 months
Whether the participant completed the trial (yes/no)
From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant completed the trial (yes/no)
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Whether the Study Management Group (SMG) and recruiters are in clinical equipoise in relation to treatment arms (yes/no) measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews.
24 months
Whether surgeons and speech therapists are in clinical equipoise in relation to treatment arms (yes/no) measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. between the two treatments
24 months
Patient views and beliefs on randomisation, recruitment and retention measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. processes
24 months
Patient and surgeon/speech therapist views on utility of chosen outcome measure measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. measures
24 months
Interaction between recruiter and patient during recruitment process measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews.
24 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Thyroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis medialisation/augmentation technique is a static technique, performed under local anaesthesia that aims to improve the positioning of the paralysed vocal fold. It uses a silastic implant readily available in different sizes according to size of larynx and gender of the patient. The correct size can be determined intraoperatively by using a measuring device while listening and visualising the larynx with flexible fiberoptic scope simultaneously.
Reinnervation
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor laryngeal reinnervation, ansa cervicalis to recurrent laryngeal nerve repair technique will be used. In this technique, the functioning ansa cervicalis nerve that overlies the internal jugular vein and the distal stump of injured recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) will be identified and anastomosed without tension (Crumley RL. Teflon versus thyroplasty versus nerve transfer: a comparison. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1990;99(10 Pt 1):759-63).
Interventions
This medialisation/augmentation technique is a static technique, performed under local anaesthesia that aims to improve the positioning of the paralysed vocal fold. It uses a silastic implant readily available in different sizes according to size of larynx and gender of the patient. The correct size can be determined intraoperatively by using a measuring device while listening and visualising the larynx with flexible fiberoptic scope simultaneously.
For laryngeal reinnervation, ansa cervicalis to recurrent laryngeal nerve repair technique will be used. In this technique, the functioning ansa cervicalis nerve that overlies the internal jugular vein and the distal stump of injured recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) will be identified and anastomosed without tension (Crumley RL. Teflon versus thyroplasty versus nerve transfer: a comparison. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1990;99(10 Pt 1):759-63).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- UVFP due to unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis of traumatic, iatrogenic or idiopathic origin of between 6 and 60 months duration. Or symptoms that have not sufficiently improved with speech therapy alone, as determined by the patient and agreed by a multidisciplinary clinical team, after 6 months and pending a surgical decision.
- Age from 18 to 70 years old
- Male or female
- Able to provide informed consent
- A significant voice disorder as measured by perceptual rating (Grade ≥2 GRBAS Scale) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10 score \>16)
- Common laryngeal electromyography (EMG, neurophysiological) criteria (Koufman Grades 2-5) in either the thyroarytenoid (TA) or posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscle on the paralysed side.
You may not qualify if:
- Impaired vocal fold mobility but a normal EMG (Koufman Grade I)
- Severe lung disorders
- Structural vocal fold lesions such as polyp
- Previous laryngeal framework surgery
- Cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF)
- Significant non-laryngeal speech abnormality (severe dysarthria determined by a panel of trained speech therapists)
- Previous Level 2, 3 or 4 thyroid neck dissection
- Previous ipsilateral surgical neck dissection
- Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck
- Laryngeal injection of a rapidly absorbable material in the last 6 months.
- Previous laryngeal injection of a non-rapidly absorbable material (e.g. bioplastics, VOX)
- Neuromuscular disease affecting the larynx or multiple cranial nerve palsies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Road
London, WC1X 8DA, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Professor Martin Birchall, FRCS,FMedSci
University College London Hospitals
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2016
First Posted
November 25, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
April 30, 2018
Last Updated
May 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05