NCT02973152

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to help determine the most effective treatment for participants with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. There are currently two types of operations used to treat this condition. One operation is called thyroplasty. Doctors place a small piece of safe plastic into the side of the participant's voice box to push the weak vocal cord into a position to enable better speech and swallowing. In the other operation called laryngeal reinnervation, doctors repair the neck nerve supply to the vocal cord using parts of other unaffected nerves to enable better speech and swallowing. The investigators do not know which of these methods is better and are conducting this study to start comparing the two operations so that a larger clinical trial can be conducted in the future to tell us which operation is best.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2016

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 29, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Type I ThyroplastyReinnervation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Whether the participant was randomised (yes/no)

    From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant was randomised (yes/no)

    24 months

  • Whether the participant successfully received the allocated operation (yes/no)

    From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant successfully received the allocated operation (yes/no)

    24 months

  • Whether the participant completed the trial (yes/no)

    From those participants who were eligible to enter the study, whether the participant completed the trial (yes/no)

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Whether the Study Management Group (SMG) and recruiters are in clinical equipoise in relation to treatment arms (yes/no) measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews.

    24 months

  • Whether surgeons and speech therapists are in clinical equipoise in relation to treatment arms (yes/no) measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. between the two treatments

    24 months

  • Patient views and beliefs on randomisation, recruitment and retention measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. processes

    24 months

  • Patient and surgeon/speech therapist views on utility of chosen outcome measure measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews. measures

    24 months

  • Interaction between recruiter and patient during recruitment process measured by Qualitative researcher via interviews.

    24 months

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Thyroplasty

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This medialisation/augmentation technique is a static technique, performed under local anaesthesia that aims to improve the positioning of the paralysed vocal fold. It uses a silastic implant readily available in different sizes according to size of larynx and gender of the patient. The correct size can be determined intraoperatively by using a measuring device while listening and visualising the larynx with flexible fiberoptic scope simultaneously.

Procedure: Thyroplasty

Reinnervation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For laryngeal reinnervation, ansa cervicalis to recurrent laryngeal nerve repair technique will be used. In this technique, the functioning ansa cervicalis nerve that overlies the internal jugular vein and the distal stump of injured recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) will be identified and anastomosed without tension (Crumley RL. Teflon versus thyroplasty versus nerve transfer: a comparison. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1990;99(10 Pt 1):759-63).

Procedure: Reinnervation

Interventions

ThyroplastyPROCEDURE

This medialisation/augmentation technique is a static technique, performed under local anaesthesia that aims to improve the positioning of the paralysed vocal fold. It uses a silastic implant readily available in different sizes according to size of larynx and gender of the patient. The correct size can be determined intraoperatively by using a measuring device while listening and visualising the larynx with flexible fiberoptic scope simultaneously.

Thyroplasty
ReinnervationPROCEDURE

For laryngeal reinnervation, ansa cervicalis to recurrent laryngeal nerve repair technique will be used. In this technique, the functioning ansa cervicalis nerve that overlies the internal jugular vein and the distal stump of injured recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) will be identified and anastomosed without tension (Crumley RL. Teflon versus thyroplasty versus nerve transfer: a comparison. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1990;99(10 Pt 1):759-63).

Reinnervation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • UVFP due to unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis of traumatic, iatrogenic or idiopathic origin of between 6 and 60 months duration. Or symptoms that have not sufficiently improved with speech therapy alone, as determined by the patient and agreed by a multidisciplinary clinical team, after 6 months and pending a surgical decision.
  • Age from 18 to 70 years old
  • Male or female
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • A significant voice disorder as measured by perceptual rating (Grade ≥2 GRBAS Scale) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10 score \>16)
  • Common laryngeal electromyography (EMG, neurophysiological) criteria (Koufman Grades 2-5) in either the thyroarytenoid (TA) or posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscle on the paralysed side.

You may not qualify if:

  • Impaired vocal fold mobility but a normal EMG (Koufman Grade I)
  • Severe lung disorders
  • Structural vocal fold lesions such as polyp
  • Previous laryngeal framework surgery
  • Cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF)
  • Significant non-laryngeal speech abnormality (severe dysarthria determined by a panel of trained speech therapists)
  • Previous Level 2, 3 or 4 thyroid neck dissection
  • Previous ipsilateral surgical neck dissection
  • Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck
  • Laryngeal injection of a rapidly absorbable material in the last 6 months.
  • Previous laryngeal injection of a non-rapidly absorbable material (e.g. bioplastics, VOX)
  • Neuromuscular disease affecting the larynx or multiple cranial nerve palsies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Road

London, WC1X 8DA, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vocal Cord Paralysis

Interventions

Laryngoplasty

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laryngeal DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesVagus Nerve DiseasesCranial Nerve DiseasesNervous System DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Professor Martin Birchall, FRCS,FMedSci

    University College London Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2016

First Posted

November 25, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

April 30, 2018

Study Completion

April 30, 2018

Last Updated

May 29, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations