Heartflow (AFFECTS)
AFFECTS
Assessment of Fractional Flow reservE Computed Tomography Versus Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease. (AFFECTS)
1 other identifier
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall objective of the AFFECTS Study is to assess agreement between SPECT and FFRct in identifying vessel-specific, hemodynamically significant CAD in patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) based on abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion scans. In particular, the study will evaluate the ability of FFRct to correctly rule out hemodynamically significant CAD in patients with non-significant CAD or normal coronary arteries who had positive SPECT scans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 18, 2022
February 1, 2022
5.8 years
November 22, 2016
March 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Positive finding of hemodynamically significant CAD according to SPECT.
24 months
Positive finding of hemodynamically significant CAD according to FFRct.
24 months
Positive finding of hemodynamically significant CAD according to ICA +/- iFFR.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Physician intuition regarding presence of vessel-specific, hemodynamically significant CAD after review of FFRct results.
24 months
Cumulative radiation exposure in the study cohort during SPECT, cCTA, and ICA and potential impact of FFRct in reducing radiation exposure in patients with no hemodynamically significant CAD.
24 months
Potential economic impact of FFRct in decreasing referral to ICA in patients without hemodynamically significant CAD.
24 months
Study Arms (1)
FFRct versus SPECT
OTHERComparison of the diagnostic performance of FFRct and SPECT in subjects with suspected stable CAD
Interventions
enable the comparison of diagnostic performance of FFRct and SPECT in subjects with suspected stable CAD after abnormal SPECT imaging who have no contraindications to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Providing written informed consent
- Subjects with abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging results who have been referred for clinically indicated ICA within 90-days of SPECT.
- Ability to undergo cCTA
You may not qualify if:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
- Prior, clinically documented, myocardial infarction (MI).
- Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
- Prior coronary stenting
- Evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability including unstable angina, intractable arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, unstable BP, and severe CHF (NYHA class III or IV) or acute pulmonary edema
- Contraindications for cCTA such as:
- Presence of pacemaker or internal defibrillator leads such that coronary visualization is impaired
- Chronic atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular response
- Known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast that cannot be pre-medicated
- Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in women of childbearing age
- Contraindication to acute beta blockade
- Contraindication to acute sublingual nitrate administration
- Prosthetic heart valve such that coronary visualization is impaired
- Contraindications for FFRct such as:
- Complex congenital heart disease other than anomalous coronary origins alone
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Brown, MD
Baylor Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2016
First Posted
November 25, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share