Effectiveness of Non-surgical Interventions for the Trigger Finger: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
132
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic modalities (paraffin, ultrasound and orthotics) versus corticosteroid injection for trigger finger.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 6, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.8 years
November 7, 2016
July 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in the Resolution/cure of the trigger finger until the six months of the treatment
The patient must extend and flex the affected finger 10 times to verify the presence or absence of the trigger finger and determine the degree of commitment.
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in SF-12 (quality of life)
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in the numbers of the Complications
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in the numbers of the Relapses
1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Study Arms (2)
Therapeutic Modalities
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Group 1: Metal orthotic, keeping 0º of the extension of the proximal interphalangeal joint, during all day, for 5 weeks, stopping the use only for bathing * Group 2: 10 LLLT sessions applications on the A1 pulley and lump formed on the flexor tendon of the the affected finger; Two sessions per week, five weeks of treatment. * Group 3: Paraffin bath 2 times a week for 20 minutes (total of 10 sessions).
Corticosteroid injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 4: Corticosteroid injection in the A1 pulley, 1 application.
Interventions
participants will be instructed to remove the orthosis only two hours in the morning, two hours in the afternoon and two hours at night to avoid joint stiffness
The LLLT parameters are: * LASER 904nm * P: 1.5W/cm² * 30mV/cm² * Area 2 cm² * 1 Joule por ponto ( in the A1 pulley)
Paraffin will be heated and maintained at 50 ° C. Participants will immerse their affected hand 10 times in heated paraffin, then they will roll up their affected hand in a towel that they will bring, after 20 minutes timed by a trained professional, the subjects will remove the towel and "paraffin glove":
The injection solution is composed of 1 ml of betamethasone and 1 ml of 2% lidocaine.This group may repeat the procedure in two weeks if they report that there was no improvement of the triggering or pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- grade of trigger finger (Quinnell´s classification)
- Signing the Terms of Consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of finger trigger in children
- Presence of traumatic finger trigger
- Secondary causes (patients with tumor of the tendon sheath,
- synovitis tuberculosis, etc ...)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beatriz Sernajoto Cristiani Pedrolead
- Federal University of São Paulocollaborator
Related Publications (17)
Binder A, Hodge G, Greenwood AM, Hazleman BL, Page Thomas DP. Is therapeutic ultrasound effective in treating soft tissue lesions? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Feb 16;290(6467):512-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6467.512.
PMID: 3918652BACKGROUNDColbourn J, Heath N, Manary S, Pacifico D. Effectiveness of splinting for the treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Ther. 2008 Oct-Dec;21(4):336-43. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
PMID: 19006759BACKGROUNDChen PT, Lin CJ, Jou IM, Chieh HF, Su FC, Kuo LC. One digit interruption: the altered force patterns during functionally cylindrical grasping tasks in patients with trigger digits. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083632. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24391799BACKGROUNDTarbhai K, Hannah S, von Schroeder HP. Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):243-9, 249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.038. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
PMID: 22189188BACKGROUNDLanger D, Luria S, Maeir A, Erez A. Occupation-based assessments and treatments of trigger finger: a survey of occupational therapists from Israel and the United States. Occup Ther Int. 2014 Dec;21(4):143-55. doi: 10.1002/oti.1372. Epub 2014 May 12.
PMID: 24821018BACKGROUNDHowitt S, Wong J, Zabukovec S. The conservative treatment of Trigger thumb using Graston Techniques and Active Release Techniques. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2006 Dec;50(4):249-54.
PMID: 17549185BACKGROUNDPeters-Veluthamaningal C, van der Windt DA, Winters JC, Meyboom-de Jong B. Corticosteroid injection for trigger finger in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD005617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005617.pub2.
PMID: 19160256BACKGROUNDHuisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Coert JH, Friden J; European HANDGUIDE Group. Multidisciplinary consensus guideline for managing trigger finger: results from the European HANDGUIDE Study. Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;94(10):1421-33. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130135. Epub 2014 May 8.
PMID: 24810861BACKGROUNDRenno AC, Toma RL, Feitosa SM, Fernandes K, Bossini PS, de Oliveira P, Parizotto N, Ribeiro DA. Comparative effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and low-level laser therapy on injured skeletal muscle. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Jan;29(1):5-10. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2715. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
PMID: 21166589BACKGROUNDSalim N, Abdullah S, Sapuan J, Haflah NH. Outcome of corticosteroid injection versus physiotherapy in the treatment of mild trigger fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jan;37(1):27-34. doi: 10.1177/1753193411415343. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PMID: 21816888BACKGROUNDQuinnell RC. Conservative management of trigger finger. Practitioner. 1980 Feb;224(1340):187-90. No abstract available.
PMID: 7367373BACKGROUNDValdes K. A retrospective review to determine the long-term efficacy of orthotic devices for trigger finger. J Hand Ther. 2012 Jan-Mar;25(1):89-95; quiz 96. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.09.005.
PMID: 22265444BACKGROUNDDingemanse R, Randsdorp M, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Evidence for the effectiveness of electrophysical modalities for treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):957-65. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091513. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
PMID: 23335238BACKGROUNDDilek B, Gozum M, Sahin E, Baydar M, Ergor G, El O, Bircan C, Gulbahar S. Efficacy of paraffin bath therapy in hand osteoarthritis: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4):642-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.024. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
PMID: 23187044BACKGROUNDSibtain F, Khan A, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S. Efficacy of Paraffin Wax Bath with and without Joint Mobilization Techniques in Rehabilitation of post-Traumatic stiff hand. Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Apr;29(2):647-50.
PMID: 24353596BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.
PMID: 15866967BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- BSCPedro
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2016
First Posted
November 25, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share