ESWL Versus ESWL and Endoscopic Treatment
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined With Endoscopic Treatment for Painful Calcified Chronic Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study wants to compare ESWL alone with ESWL and endoscopic drainage of the MPD for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedJune 1, 2018
May 1, 2018
2.5 years
September 5, 2016
May 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline pain score as accessed by izbichi pain score at 12 month
Whether pain is relieved depends on the change of Izbicki pain score at the baseline and 12 months after the procedure(ERCP alone or ERCP combined with ERCP). Izbicki pain score is composed of 4 parts, that is frequency of pain attacks(daily counts for 100, several times a week counts for 75, several times a month counts for 50, several times a year counts for 25 and several times a year counts for 0), VAS(subjective evaluation of pain by patients from no pain which is 0 points to imaginative maximum of pain which is 100 points), analgesic medication(morphine consumption is 100, buprenorphine is 80, pethidine is 20, tramaldol is 15, metamizole is 3 and acetylsalicylacid is 1) and time of disease-related inability to work(permanet is 100, ≤1 month is 50, ≤1 week is 25 and no inability to work during the last year is 0). Each part counts for 100 points in all.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
exocrine function of the pancreas through determination of fecal elastase as assessed by fecal elastase kit
12 months
clearance of pancreatic stones
12 months
decompression rate of the pancreatic duct as the change of pancreatic duct diameter assessed by S-MRCP
12 months
Other Outcomes (5)
complication rate
1 months
endocrine function as assessed by the combination of fasting blood glucose, insulin, C peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin
12 months
treatment-related cost from initial treatment to the end of the study(12 months)
12 months
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESWL alone
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group would be treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy only. Otherwise, extra endoscopic procedures will be carried out in case of continuous and aggravated pain. Analgesics will be administrated as needed and recorded.
ESWL combined with ERCP
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeople in this group would be treated with ESWL followed be endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct in 48 hours. Analgesics will be administrated as needed and recorded.
Interventions
People in this group would be treated with ESWL only.
People in this group would be treated with ESWL followed be endoscopic drainage in 48 hours.
Analgesics administrated include morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid. They will only be administrated as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- painful chronic pancreatitis(abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months);
- at least 1 calcified stone greater than 5 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct with upstream duct dilation;
- no ERCP or ESWL carried out before admission
You may not qualify if:
- suspected to have malignant tumors;
- history of pancreatic surgery or gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II);
- pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT scan;
- age below 18 years;
- pregnancy or lactation;
- refuse to write informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433, China
Shanghai Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2016
First Posted
November 23, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share