Postural Control and Trunk Neuromuscular Activation in Athletes With Chronic Low Back Pain
PCMALBP
An Intervention Program for the Trunk Neuromuscular Pattern and Postural Control in Athletes Chronic With Low Back Pain: A Feasibility and Clinical Trial Study
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The relevance of this study is given by the feasibility to assess the effect of an intervention program based on the postural control and trunk neuromuscular activity, comparing two methods: stabilization exercises vs. back strengthening exercises, in athletes with low back pain. The main outcomes will be computed by electromyography measurement so that to assess the trunk neuromuscular activation pattern as well as by force platform parameters for determining of postural control. Clinical symptoms such as pain intensity, perception of disability and fear and avoidance will also be computed. This is the first study to compare two intervention methods using the main biological outcomes related to trunk neuromuscular function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedMay 10, 2023
May 1, 2023
3.7 years
November 11, 2016
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Eletromyography measurement
EMG estimates, Root Mean Square: RMS (in microvolts unit: uV) and Median Frequency: MF (in Hertz: Hz) will be computed to evaluate the back activation during strength maximal protocol and endurance dynamic test.
Change from baseline muscular activation at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Force platform measurement
Change from baseline muscular activation at 8 weeks
Other Outcomes (3)
Visual Analogic Scale
Change from baseline muscular activation at 8 weeks
Disability questionnaire
Change from baseline muscular activation at 8 weeks
Fear-avoidance questionnaire
Change from baseline muscular activation at 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
G1: exercises for lumbar stabilization
EXPERIMENTALSpecific exercises for lumbar stabilization. The Group 1 (G1) will perform therapy with specific exercises for lumbar stabilization whith the Swiss ball as a therapeutic resource, including warming; stretching of hamstrings, paraspinals, trapezes; phasic perineal exercise; tonic perineal exercise; pelvic lumbar synergism; trunk mobility; mobility of the shoulder girdle; balance; and slow pelvic balance.
G2: back strengthening exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORBack strengthening exercises. The Group 2 (G2) will perform therapy including strengthning of back muscles on a Roman chair machine for flexion and extension of trunk with load progression from training volume for endurance and strength gains.
Interventions
Specific exercises for lumbar stabilization. The Group 1 (G1) will perform therapy with specific exercises for lumbar stabilization whith the Swiss ball as a therapeutic resource, including warming; stretching of hamstrings, paraspinals, trapezes; phasic perineal exercise; tonic perineal exercise; pelvic lumbar synergism; trunk mobility; mobility of the shoulder girdle; balance; and slow pelvic balance.
Specific back exercises. The Group 2 (G2) will perform therapy including back strengthing exercise on a Roman chair machine to perform flexion and extension of trunk with load progressive training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- chronic low back pain at least for three months, in a unique or multiple episodes.
- low back pain of unknown origin and mechanical nature.
- athletes must be train or play five times in a week.
- athletes must be participate in some official competition.
You may not qualify if:
- previous surgery (locomotor appareil).
- discal herniation diagnosis.
- nerve root entrapment.
- spondylolisis.
- spondylolisthesis;
- lumbar stenosis.
- hip cartilage damage.
- labral injury,
- piriformis syndrome.
- neurological disease.
- no current treatment in Physiotherapy or Pilates or Manual Therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laboratory of Functional Assessment and Human Motor Performance (LAFUP)
Londrina, Paraná, 86041-120, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V. Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1155-67. doi: 10.1177/0269215515570379. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25681408BACKGROUNDMoon HJ, Choi KH, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lee KH, Kim JH, Choi YJ. Effect of lumbar stabilization and dynamic lumbar strengthening exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;37(1):110-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.110. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PMID: 23525973BACKGROUNDCairns MC, Foster NE, Wright C. Randomized controlled trial of specific spinal stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy for recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19):E670-81. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232787.71938.5d.
PMID: 16946640BACKGROUNDMcGill SM, Karpowicz A. Exercises for spine stabilization: motion/motor patterns, stability progressions, and clinical technique. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.026.
PMID: 19154838BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rubens da Silva, PhD
Laboratory of Functional Assessment and Human Motor Performance (LAFUP)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2016
First Posted
November 21, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 28, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share