A Campaign-based ID fIPV Administration Trial
A Pragmatic Trial to Quantitatively and Qualitatively Assess Different Techniques for the ID Administration of Fractional Dose IPV in a Campaign Setting in The Gambia
1 other identifier
interventional
2,721
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The introduction of one dose of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) into routine immunization schedules in OPV-only using countries as part of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was planned for completion in 2016. However, due to recent developments in the global IPV supply landscape, the GPEI polio eradication program is facing a critical shortage of the vaccine which is forecast to continue until at least the end of 2017. The shortage means that some countries that have already introduced the vaccine, but which are considered to be relatively low risk (The Gambia included), will be left without adequate supplies and in other countries IPV introduction is being unavoidably delayed. Exacerbating the shortage is the need to reserve IPV for future outbreak responses (OBR). The current OBR protocol recommends that, if a circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) outbreak occurs (after the recent global switch from trivalent to bivalent OPV), a large scale IPV campaign will be implemented to increase population immunity to the type 2 poliovirus in an large area surrounding the outbreak as high risk of extending transmission. Due to above, dose-sparing through the administration of intra-dermal (ID) fractional (one fifth - 0.1mL) doses of IPV (fIPV) has become a very important focus and, for planning purposes, there is an urgent need to assess the practical and logistic challenges a country such as The Gambia would face in rapidly undertaking an ID fIPV campaign.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 18, 2018
CompletedJanuary 3, 2019
January 1, 2019
5 months
September 19, 2016
January 2, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Total time taken to deliver ID fIPV using each of the three methods of administration
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Qualitative measures of administration method utility
Ergonomic characteristics of the intradermal administration methods collected through questionnaires
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Local and systemic reactogenicity collected according to standard severity score (0 - 4) system.
Local reactogenicity (induration, erythema, tenderness, fever, vomiting, diarrhoea, feeding, irritability) will be collected on all vaccines on day 3 following vaccine administration
Day 3 following vaccination
Serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events (AE) following ID fIPV administration
Within 4 weeks of vaccination
Semi-quantitative measure of distress in infants and children associated with ID fIPV administration
Infant distress will be graded according to a visual analogue scale
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Storage volumes of equipment required for ID fIPV delivery and subsequent bio-waste disposal including any differences the equipment required to safely deliver such vaccinations in a campaign
The volume of the disposables and biowaste created by each of the administration methods will be recorded.
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Number of ID fIPV doses deliverable per IPV vial using each of the three administration methods (to identify any wastage associated with syringe/device filling)
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Immune response to ID fIPV (poliovirus neutralization assays)
Poliovirus neutralization assays
Serum sample taken at baseline (pre-vaccination) and 4 weeks following vaccination
Changes in the time taken to deliver the ID fIPV and in the immune responses generated over the course of a 3 day campaign
Over 3 days of the campaign
Changes in the vaccine vial monitors (VVM) and also temperature deviations identified using a continuous temperature data logger associated with a campaign using each of the three administration methods
Over 3 days of the campaign
Qualitative factors which might influence campaign uptake in The Gambia and comparable sub-Saharan African settings
1 week following vaccination campaign
Number of ID fIPV doses delivered using each of the three methods in the course of a defined campaign day by one vaccination team
Collected on day 1, 2 or 3 of the vaccination campaign
Study Arms (3)
ID Needle and Syringe
ACTIVE COMPARATORFractional (0.1mL) dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) administered using a needle and syringe
ID Adaptor (Helm)
EXPERIMENTALFractional (0.1mL) dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) administered using a needle and syringe with an ID adaptor
ID Jet Injector (Tropis, Pharmajet)
EXPERIMENTALFractional (0.1mL) dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) administered by needle and syringe with a disposable syringe jet injecto
Interventions
ID adaptor fixed to the end of a standard ID needle and syringe to facilitate ID administration of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine
ID disposable syringe (needle free) jet injector to facilitate ID administration of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine
Standard ID needle and syringe for ID administration of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written or thumb-printed informed consent obtained from a child's parent or guardian
- Resident within the geographical area which is expected to be covered by the campaign
- Between 4 and 59 months of age at the time of the campaign
You may not qualify if:
- Anaphylaxis or a severe, potentially life threatening, allergic reaction to a previous vaccination
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambialead
- World Health Organizationcollaborator
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
MRC Unit The Gambia
Banjul, The Gambia
Related Publications (1)
Bashorun AO, Badjie Hydara M, Adigweme I, Umesi A, Danso B, Johnson N, Sambou NA, Fofana S, Kanu FJ, Jeyaseelan V, Verma H, Weldon WC, Oberste MS, Sutter RW, Jeffries D, Wathuo M, Mach O, Clarke E. Intradermal administration of fractional doses of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine in a campaign: a pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority trial in The Gambia. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e257-e268. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00497-6. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
PMID: 34951974DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ed Clarke, MRCPCH MSc PhD
MRC Unit The Gambia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adedapo O Bashorun, MBBS
MRC Unit The Gambia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- six vaccination teams will be randomly assigned to administer the three different ID fIPV administration technique the campaign days
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2016
First Posted
November 18, 2016
Study Start
February 7, 2017
Primary Completion
July 10, 2017
Study Completion
September 18, 2018
Last Updated
January 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share