Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of VisioCyt® Test, in Case of Suspicion of Urothelial Bladder Tumors
VISIOCYT 1
1 other identifier
interventional
1,360
1 country
14
Brief Summary
This clinical study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of VisioCyt test, which would improve the early diagnosis of bladder cancer in order to optimize the management of individual patients as part of a cancer diagnostic monitoring. The diagnostic method of VisioCyt® device is based on the analysis by transmission and fluorescence, of urinary cytology slides prepared according to the protocol VisioCyt.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2021
CompletedJanuary 6, 2022
December 1, 2021
3.9 years
October 28, 2016
December 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Identification and classification of cells with the VisioCyt test to create an image processing algorithm
\* Identification and classification of cells, taking the Paris System in 2016 as a referential
9 months
Identification of presence or absence of a membrane fluorescence perished with the VisioCyt test to create an image processing algorithm
presence or absence of a membrane fluorescence perished, on slides
9 months
sensitivity of urinalysis by VisioCyt test
number of patients "declared positive" with the VisioCyt test among the patients actually suffering from bladder carcinoma
through the study completion
specificity of urinalysis by VisioCyt test
number of patients "declared negative" with the VisioCyt test among the really healthy patients
through the study completion
Secondary Outcomes (4)
sensitivity of urinalysis by VisioCyt test according to the cell grade of the patients
through the study completion
sensitivity of urinalysis by VisioCyt test according to medical history of the patients
through the study completion
comparison of the sensitivity of the urinalysis by VisioCyt test versus conventional urine cytology
through the study completion
comparison of the specificity urinalysis by VisioCyt test versus conventional urine cytology
through the study completion
Study Arms (3)
Patients 'sick'
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients of this arm have a clinical signs of bladder cancer with : * a positive result of bladder endoscopy * or an negative endoscopy and a positive result of the conventional cytology The intervention consists to collect an additional urine sample (50 ml), the day of the bladder endoscopy, which is performed during the current practice .This urine sample will be used for the preparation of cytology slides according to the Visiocyt protocol, in order to be digitized
Patients 'healthy'
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients of this arm have no suspicion of bladder cancer with negative results of their bladder endoscopy and conventional cytology. The intervention consists to collect an additional urine sample (50 ml), the day of the bladder endoscopy, which is performed during the current practice . This urine sample will be used for the preparation of cytology slides according to the Visiocyt protocol, in order to be digitized.
Patients 'monitoring'
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients of this arm have a history of bladder cancer, but the results of their follow up examinations (cytologic and endoscopic) are negative (no tumor). The intervention consists to collect an additional urine sample (50 ml), the day of the bladder endoscopy, which is performed during the current practice . This urine sample will be used for the preparation of cytology slides according to the Visiocyt protocol, in order to be digitized.
Interventions
The cytology slides obtained from the current practice will be compared to the slides obtained with the Visiocyt protocol, for each arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Patient affiliated to a social security system
- Patient able to understand the protocol.
- Signature of patient consent form before the start of the study
- Negative urine culture
- Patient for which is programmed a bladder Endoscopy for :
- suspected bladder cancer (de novo, monitoring or relapse)
- Exploration lower urinary tract excluding a suspected bladder cancer or prostate cancer
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years
- Ongoing Urinary tract infection untreated
- Private person of liberty or under guardianship (including guardianship)
- Bladder cancer excluding urothelial carcinoma
- Carcinoma of high urinary tract, associated
- Lithiasis pathology
- Patient who underwent renal transplantation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vitadxlead
- FONDATION FORCE POUR L'INNOVATION ET LA RECHERCHE EN SANTEcollaborator
- SATT Paris Saclaycollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Hôpital d'Antony
Antony, France
Clinique " la Châtaigneraie "
Beaumont, France
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, 25000, France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, France
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13009, France
Clinique BeauSoleil
Montpellier, 34070, France
Hôtel Dieu, CHR de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
CHU Caremeau, Nimes
Nîmes, 30029, France
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, France
Hopital Rangueil
Toulouse, France
CHRU Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2016
First Posted
November 17, 2016
Study Start
January 24, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
January 16, 2021
Last Updated
January 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share