Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
1,114
1 country
16
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been successfully proven to be a non-inferior alternative regarding resection quality, and oncological outcomes of patients as compared to open surgery in mangy clinical trails. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is advantageous over open surgery with regard to operative invasiveness, patient's recovery, and wound related complications. Thus, laparoscopic surgery has gained great popularity over the past decades. However, specifically for mid and low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery is technically demanding, which sometimes leads to high morbidity and unsatisfactory resection quality, especially in challenging cases such as bulky mesorectum, enlarged prostate, irradiated pelvis, etc. Under this circumstance, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) , the so called "down-to-up" alternative, has emerged as a promising solution to these problems in recent years and more and more small studies have proven the feasibility and advantages of this technique, making it become a hot topic among both literature and conferences. However, TaTME is still at early birth, higher-level evidences, either multicentric, or comparative study with conventional surgery is strikingly lacking. Thus the investigators conduct this multicentre randomised clinical trial, comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer, aiming to prove the hypothesis that TaTME may achieve better resection quality and result in non-inferior oncological outcome, as well as short term operative morbidity and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
January 17, 2025
January 1, 2025
10.3 years
November 8, 2016
January 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival
3 years
Overall survival
Overall survival
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM)
3 years
Overall survival
10 years
Mesorectal completeness
3 years
Number of retrieved lymph nodes
3 years
Morbidity rate
1 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
EXPERIMENTALThe rectum is mobilized and resected transanally (from bottom to up) according to TME principles, via transanal platform (either rigid or flexible platform).An ideal TaTME is defined as the extraperitoneal portion of the rectum being mobilized from below.
Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe traditional laparoscopic TME (LpTME) was performed via standard laparoscopic techniques, including multiple trocars and conventional laparoscopic instruments.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma;
- tumor located below the level of peritoneal reflection ;
- diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery;
- no evidence of distant metastases;
- preoperative tumor stage within III;
- no threaten mesorectal fascia (MRF)after neoadjuvant therapy;
- no contraindication to laparoscopic surgery;
- without history of other malignancies;
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- could not perform sphincter preservation surgery (requiring a Mile's procedure);
- T4b tumor invading adjacent organs;
- T1 tumors that can be locally resected
- should take neoadjuvant therapy but refuse it;
- recurrent cancer;
- concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years;
- emergent surgery with intestinal obstruction or perforation;
- history of colorectal surgery;
- fecal incontinence;
- history of inflammatory bowel disease;
- with contraindications to general anaesthesia(ASA class 4 or 5);
- pregnant or breast-feeding;
- history of mental disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sun Yat-sen Universitylead
- Peking Union Medical College Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Hospital of Jilin Universitycollaborator
- RenJi Hospitalcollaborator
- Shengjing Hospitalcollaborator
- The Second People's Hospital of Yibincollaborator
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical Universitycollaborator
- Nanchong Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Zunyi Medical Collegecollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South Chinacollaborator
- Xinqiao Hospitalcollaborator
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical Universitycollaborator
- First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong Universitycollaborator
- Ruijin Hospitalcollaborator
- Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical Universitycollaborator
- The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (16)
Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical university
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042, China
Department of colorectal surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Nanfang Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510559, China
The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524001, China
Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
Zunyi, Guizhou, 563003, China
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China
Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200127, China
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, China
Department of gastrointestinal surgery, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin
Yibin, Sichuan, 644000, China
XinQiao Hospital of Army Medical University
Chongqing, 400037, China
Related Publications (5)
Chen WH, Kang L, Luo SL, Zhang XW, Huang Y, Liu ZH, Wang JP. Transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Sep;19(9):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1342-1. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26220109BACKGROUNDKang L, Chen WH, Luo SL, Luo YX, Liu ZH, Huang MJ, Wang JP. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2552-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4521-2. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26310534BACKGROUNDZeng Z, Luo S, Zhang H, Wu M, Ma D, Wang Q, Xie M, Xu Q, Ouyang J, Xiao Y, Song Y, Feng B, Xu Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Shi L, Ling L, Zhang X, Huang L, Yang Z, Peng J, Wu X, Ren D, Huang M, Lan P, Wang J, Tong W, Ren M, Liu H, Kang L; Chinese Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Collaborative (CTESC) Group. Transanal vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer: The TaLaR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):774-783. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24276.
PMID: 39847361DERIVEDChen M, Ye F, Huang P, Liang Z, Liu H, Zheng X, Li W, Luo S, Kang L, Huang L. Inflammatory stress response after transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a cohort study based on the TaLaR trial. Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):151-158. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000838.
PMID: 37916926DERIVEDZeng Z, Luo S, Chen J, Cai Y, Zhang X, Kang L. Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3956-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07167-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
PMID: 31586244DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jianping Wang, MD,PHD
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2016
First Posted
November 17, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01