A Phase II Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CRT VS Neo-CRT in Patients Who Achieved CCR for Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(Neo-CRT) plus surgery has been regarded as a standard of care for patients with resectable locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Many studies suggest that definitive Radiochemotherapy(CRT) has similar efficacy as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancers who respond to chemoradiation. Herein, a single center prospective randomized phase II clinical trial will be carried out to compare efficacy and safety of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection in patients who achieved clinical complete response(CCR) after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for stage II-III esophageal Cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 18, 2017
October 1, 2016
2 years
October 29, 2016
July 13, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Compare overall survival of definitive radiochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy plus radical resection for esophageal cancer patients who achieved clinical complete response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Progression-free survival
3 years
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
5 years
Comparison of pathological diagnosis between specimens of endoscopic biopsy and surgically resected in esophageal cancer
2 years
Comparison between gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated with ultrasonic endoscopically placed titanium clips and GTV with conventional contouring method in thoracic esophageal cancer
1 year
Determination of internal target volume (ITV) of thoracic esophageal cancer by evaluating movement of ultrasonic endoscopically placed titanium clips, with or without swallowing, during radiotherapy simulation
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Definitive Radiochemotherapy
EXPERIMENTALConcurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy,IMRT, 60Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel (25mg/m2)+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day.
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConcurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy,IMRT, 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel (25mg/m2)+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day; Receive radical surgery 4 to 6 weeks later.
Interventions
Radiotherapy,IMRT, 60Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel (25mg/m2)+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day
Concurrent Radiochemotherapy: Radiotherapy,IMRT, 40Gy; Chemotherapy, Docetaxel (25mg/m2)+Cisplatin (25mg/m2) 1st/8th/15th/22nd day; Receive radical surgery 4 to 6 weeks later.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Thoracic esophageal cancer patients or esophagocardial cancer patients, with locally advanced resectable tumor, clinically identified before treatment as T1-3N+M0 according to UICC(International Union Against Cancer) TNM(primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis) Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th ed.
- Untreated patients who have not received any antitumor therapy
- Life expectancy \>6 months
- Age: 18-70 years
- White blood cell count ≥4.0×109/l, ANC(absolute neutrophil count) ≥1.5×109/l, thrombocyte count ≥1011/l, hemoglobin ≥90 g/l; normal liver and kidney functions
- WHO PS(Performance Status): 0-1
- Patients who understood the study and gave signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have already received antitumor therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery;
- Patients with hemorrhage or complicated hemorrhage
- Other uncontrollable patients who are not suitable for surgery
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients who agree without acknowledgement as a result of psychological, family or social factors
- Patients with CTCAE(Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events Version 4.0) grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy
- Patients who have ever had malignant tumors other than esophageal cancer
- Patients with a history of diabetes for \>10 years with unsatisfactory control of blood glucose level
- Patients with serious heart, lung, liver or kidney dysfunction, hematopathy, immune system disease or cachexia who therefore cannot tolerate chemotherapy or surgery
- Others.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300060, China
Related Publications (1)
Qian D, Chen X, Shang X, Wang Y, Tang P, Han D, Jiang H, Chen C, Zhao G, Zhou D, Cao F, Er P, Zhang W, Li X, Zhang T, Zhang B, Guan Y, Wang J, Yuan Z, Yu Z, Wang P, Pang Q. Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete response when induction chemoradiation finished: A phase II random. Radiother Oncol. 2022 Sep;174:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
PMID: 35764191DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Qingsong Pang, Doctor
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2016
First Posted
November 9, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share