Optimizing the Effectiveness of Routine Post-treatment Surveillance in Prostate Cancer Survivors
1 other identifier
observational
11,314
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Through this study, the investigators seek to identify the benefits (improved survival) and harms (more procedures, more treatment, side effects, and quality-of-life impact) from different surveillance frequencies-every three vs. six vs. 12 months. Using the National Cancer Database and quality-of-life data from a large group of prostate cancer survivors, the investigators aim to compare survival, procedures/tests, treatments, and side effects in prostate cancer survivors who are followed with alternative surveillance frequencies and compare quality-of-life outcomes. The overall goal of the study is to provide high-quality data that will allow development of a personalized, risk-based tailored approach to post-treatment surveillance for prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2016
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 20, 2021
CompletedOctober 20, 2021
May 1, 2021
3 years
November 3, 2016
July 8, 2019
September 23, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Survival
Time to death or date of last follow-up after primary treatment with surgery or radiation.
From completion of primary treatment with surgery or radiation to the earliest occurrence of death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study period.
Prostate Cancer Anxiety
Prostate cancer anxiety was measured annually (starting 12 months after participant enrollment) using the validated Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC). The instrument contains 18 questions across 3 subscales assessing anxiety related to prostate cancer (11 items), PSA testing (3 items), and fear of recurrence (4 items). Each item was scored on a Likert-type scale (1 to 4), with a higher score indicating greater anxiety. The subscale means represent the average scores across the items in that sub-scale. The mean Total MAX-PC scores represent the average scores across the 3 subscales (anxiety related to prostate cancer; anxiety related to PSA testing; and anxiety related to prostate cancer recurrence).
12 to 60 months after participant enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time to Prostate Cancer Recurrence
Completion of primary treatment with surgery or radiation to earliest of prostate cancer recurrence, loss to follow-up, or end of study period
Treatment for Prostate Cancer Recurrence
Completion of primary treatment with surgery or radiation to earliest of prostate cancer recurrence, loss to follow-up, or end of study period
Prostate Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life
12 to 60 months after participant enrollment
Global Health-Related Quality of Life
12 to 60 months after participant enrollment
Study Arms (2)
National Cancer Data Base
Patients within the National Cancer Database with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2004 and 2010. Participating institutions each provided a random of sample of 10 patients to be included in the final cohort.
NC ProCESS
The North Carolina Prostate cancer Comparative Effectiveness \& Survivorship Study (NC ProCESS) is a prospective population-based cohort of \>1,000 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, enrolled from January 2011 through June 2013.
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 14,000 prostate cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base (nationwide cancer registry) will be analyzed. The investigators will analyze data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a cancer registry which is maintained by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC). Cancer registry staff review hospital and provider records to collect necessary data for the cancer registry so data are available for analysis for this project. There are \>1400 CoC-hospitals; 10 patients will be sampled at each hospital thus 14,000 patients will be available for analysis. The NC ProCESS cohort consists of newly-diagnosed, early stage (localized, non-metastatic) prostate cancer patients.
You may qualify if:
- Patient data part of the NCDB
- Diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2004-2005.
- Treated for prostate cancer with surgery (prostatectomy) or radiation therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Newly-diagnosed, histologically-proven, localized prostate adenocarcinoma.
- Completion of baseline interview prior to initiating therapy.
- Patient ability to complete study interview: no cognitive impairment, language or hearing problems.
- Not diagnosed with prostate cancer through transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
- Age 35-80.
- English speaking.
- Has telephone.
- Initiation of treatment for prostate cancer prior to completion of baseline interview.
- Cognitive impairment.
- Hearing problems.
- Inability to speak or understand English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ronald Chen
- Organization
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald Chen, MD, MPH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2016
First Posted
November 7, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 31, 2019
Last Updated
October 20, 2021
Results First Posted
October 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators do not plan to share data or to make individual participant data available.