NCT02955849

Brief Summary

Aims and Objectives (Quantitative) Aim: To compare the effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty with trabeculoplasty in lowering the intraocular pressure in patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma in rural China, taking into account the impact of patient acceptance of each type of treatment Hypothesis: Mean intraocular pressure after treatment with selective laser trabeculoplasty will be lower than with surgery due to higher acceptance rates among patients randomized to receive this treatment and therefore treatment provided at an earlier stage of disease progression.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 2016

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

glaucomaruralChinaSLT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraocular pressure

    * intraocular pressure in study eye 12 months after receiving treatment (laser or surgery) * the intraocular pressure of patients refusing their allocated intervention will still be recorded at 12 months post-refusal and will be considered in the analysis * patients accepting the allocated treatment \> 3 months after initial offer of treatment will be considered as having refused and their outcome intraocular pressure will be the last reading prior to treatment

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Visual quality of life

    12 months

  • Satisfaction score

    12 months

  • Cataract surgery

    12 months

  • Allocated treatment

    12 months

Study Arms (3)

SLT laser group

EXPERIMENTAL

1. selective laser trabeculoplasty for 360 degrees the study eye. 2. Patients having 1 or 2 quadrants of angle with trabecular meshwork not visible will undergo Laser peripheral iridotomy prior to selective laser trabeculoplasty to maximize the amount of angle visible; 3. Cataract surgery will be offered if indicated and completed within 3 months of selective laser trabeculoplasty , if accepted by the patient. 4. Patients will be re-examined every 4 months and selective laser trabeculoplasty performed again according to the above protocol if intraocular pressure exceeds the target (25% reduction from the original intraocular pressure or \< 21 mmHg, whichever is lower).

Device: SLT laser

Standard care group

NO INTERVENTION

* Trabeculectomy as usually performed by the operative surgeon in one eye (study eye). * Both Mitomycin and releasable sutures are permitted if indicated in the opinion of the surgeon and s/he can perform and/or has access. * Simultaneous cataract surgery is permitted if indicated in the opinion of the operating surgeon. * Patients will be re-examined every 4 months, and Timolol 0.5% added bid if intraocular pressure exceeds the target (25% reduction from the original intraocular pressure or \< 21 mmHg, whichever is lower)

Drug treatment group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients not accepting the offered treatment for the study eye within 3 months will receive topical Timolol 0.5% bid at the usual price, with the prescription to be refilled per usual practice at the hospital (usually monthly).

Interventions

SLT laserDEVICE

Patients will be offered initial SLT laser by doctors

SLT laser group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of glaucoma (Cup to disk ratio, or CDR \> 0.6 with optic nerve appearance and/or visual field findings consistent with glaucoma in the study eye)
  • angle configuration \> 180° of trabecular meshwork visible in the study eye
  • no previous ocular incisional surgery or ocular laser treatment except refractive or cataract surgery in the study eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity \> 6/60 metres in both eyes

You may not qualify if:

  • Intraocular pressure \> 35 in the study eye
  • Cup to disk ratio \> 0.9 in the study eye
  • Inability to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Blindness Preventment and Treatment Department

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Liang YB, Friedman DS, Wong TY, Zhan SY, Sun LP, Wang JJ, Duan XR, Yang XH, Wang FH, Zhou Q, Wang NL; Handan Eye Study Group. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008 Nov;115(11):1965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.030. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

    PMID: 18684506BACKGROUND
  • Zhang XJ, Liang YB, Liu YP, Jhanji V, Musch DC, Peng Y, Zheng CR, Zhang HX, Chen P, Tang X, Lam DS. Implementation of a free cataract surgery program in rural China: a community-based randomized interventional study. Ophthalmology. 2013 Feb;120(2):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.087. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

    PMID: 23107580BACKGROUND
  • Ang GS, Varga Z, Shaarawy T. Postoperative infection in penetrating versus non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;94(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.163923. Epub 2009 Nov 5.

    PMID: 19897472BACKGROUND
  • Liu T, Congdon N, Yan X, Jin L, Wu Y, Friedman D, He M. A randomized, controlled trial of an intervention promoting cataract surgery acceptance in rural China: the Guangzhou Uptake of Surgery Trial (GUSTO). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 13;53(9):5271-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9798.

    PMID: 22789919BACKGROUND
  • Wittenborn JS, Rein DB. Cost-effectiveness of glaucoma interventions in Barbados and Ghana. Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jan;88(1):155-63. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc30f3.

    PMID: 21076360BACKGROUND
  • Narayanaswamy A, Leung CK, Istiantoro DV, Perera SA, Ho CL, Nongpiur ME, Baskaran M, Htoon HM, Wong TT, Goh D, Su DH, Belkin M, Aung T. Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle-closure glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;133(2):206-12. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4893.

    PMID: 25429421BACKGROUND
  • Realini T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty for the management of open-angle glaucoma in St. Lucia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;131(3):321-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1706.

    PMID: 23348420BACKGROUND
  • Adekoya BJ, Akinsola FB, Balogun BG, Balogun MM, Ibidapo OO. Patient refusal of glaucoma surgery and associated factors in Lagos, Nigeria. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr-Jun;20(2):168-73. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.110612.

    PMID: 23741137BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nathan G Congdon, MD,MPH

    Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
vice directior

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2016

First Posted

November 4, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

March 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2016-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations