Study Stopped
The blade used in the study was modified (changed) by the manufacturer, it does not longer exist.
Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis The use of Macintosh blade sized #3.5 (vs Macintosh size #3) would reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the glottic view. Study objective The purpose of this research study is to compare 3 different laryngoscope blades (sizes: 3.5, 3.5 and 3) and see if the blades size 3.5 will reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the physician's view of the glottis compared to the standard direct laryngoscope using the blade size 3, in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. Primary end point: time to achieve successful tracheal intubation. Secondary end points: glottic view at intubation, number of intubation attempts and effectiveness of the integrated suction in the Inscope Direct Laryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2022
CompletedOctober 19, 2022
October 1, 2022
3.7 years
November 2, 2016
April 21, 2022
October 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Intubation Time (Using a Stopwatch)
Intubation Time: It is the time taken to intubate: from the initial insertion of the laryngoscope blade to the placement of the tracheal tube (approximately 3 minutes). An intubation attempt: It is defined as the insertion of the laryngoscope blade into a patient's mouth, with the objective of inserting an endotracheal tube into the trachea.
up to 3 minutes
Glottis Visualization POGO Score
The percentage of the glottis visualized (POGO) score It represents the percentage of glottic opening seen; the score ranges from 0% when none of the glottis is seen to 100% when the entire glottis, including the anterior commissure, is seen.
During intubation procedure, up to 1 minute
Time From the Insertion of the Laryngoscope Blade to Confirm w/ CO2 Waveform
The time following the initial insertion of the laryngoscope blade into the mouth to confirm w/ CO2 waveform
During intubation procedure, up to 3 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intubation Attempts
3 minutes
Glottis Visualization Using Cormack Lehane
During intubation procedure, up to 1 minute
Study Arms (3)
Blade MAC size 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will be intubated using a: Direct Laryngoscope (DL) Mac size 3 (Sun-Med GreenLine®/D™ Macintosh)
Blade MAC size 3.5
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will be intubated using a: DL-blade mac size 3.5 (Sun-Med Greenline®/D™ Macintosh)
Inscope Blade size 3.5
EXPERIMENTALPatient will be intubated using a: Inscope DL-blade size 3.5
Interventions
Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3.5
Patient will be intubated using the Inscope Blade size 3.5
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery procedures under general anesthesia
- Patients with a documented BMI of \<35
- Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document
- years of age of either gender
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I - II or III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are deemed to be such a significant of an airway risk that they necessitate awake fiberoptic intubation or a difficult tracheal intubation is anticipated
- Patients with history of difficult intubation
- Patients with oxygen saturation less than 95% at room air
- Patients with history facial abnormalities, oral-pharyngeal cancer or reconstructive surgery
- Any pathologies of the mouth, pharynx or larynx, or the access to the airway is restricted
- Patients with Immobilized cervical spine, or history of cervical abnormalities
- Patients with a history of uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux, hiatus hernia or diabetic gastroparesis
- Any coagulation disorder
- Pregnant patients
- Emergency surgeries
- Any other conditions or use of any medication which may interfere with the conduct of the Study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ofelia Loani Elvir Lazo, Research Project Advisor
- Organization
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roya Yumul, MD, PhD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2016
First Posted
November 4, 2016
Study Start
January 2, 2018
Primary Completion
September 15, 2021
Study Completion
September 15, 2021
Last Updated
October 19, 2022
Results First Posted
October 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share