Hemostasis Pad Using Chitosan After Invasive Percutaneous Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
315
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Arterial access is the key step during the endovascular treatment of cardiovascular diseases. This study was designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of the hemostasis pad using chitosan in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures with arterial approach. Two cohorts will be included in this study: transradial and transfemoral cohort. Among the transfemoral cohort, the safety and efficacy of the ezClot pad will be compared with the BloodSTOP® pad (LifeScience PLUS, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The BloodSTOP® pad is an etherized and oxidized regenerated cellulose matrix that achieves hemostasis by activating the intrinsic coagulation pathway. The hypothesis will be tested among the transradial cohort that the combined use of a hemostasis pad and a compression device is superior to that of a compression device only in terms of hemostasis in patients who underwent tranradial coronary procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 3, 2016
November 1, 2016
8 months
July 12, 2016
November 2, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to hemostasis
Immediately after invasive procedures
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Bleeding
within 24 hours
Hematoma
within 24 hours
Retroperitoneal hematoma
within 24 hours
Pseudoaneurysm
within 24 hours
Vessel occlusion
within 24 hours
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Hb at discharge
within 24 hours
Hb at 1-month F/U
1 month after discharge
Study Arms (4)
Study group (transradial cohort)
EXPERIMENTALdevice-assisted compression with ezClot pad
Study group (transfemoral cohort)
EXPERIMENTALmanual compression with ezClot pad
Control group (transradial cohort)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRotary compression device
Control group (transfemoral cohort)
ACTIVE COMPARATORmanual compression with BloodSTOP ix pad
Interventions
ezClot pad uses chitosan, a deacetylated complex carbohydrate derived from the naturally occurring substance chitin, to accelerate blood clotting.
BloodSTOP® pad is an etherized and oxidized regenerated cellulose matrix that achieves hemostasis by activating the intrinsic coagulation pathway.
Rotary compression device consists of a plastic arch and a rotary screw to deliver local pressure by moving the silicone compression pad.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 years or older
- patients undergoing invasive procedures via the radial or femoral arteries
You may not qualify if:
- congenital or acquired bleeding tendency
- platelet count \<50,000/ μL
- hypersensitivity to shrimps, lobsters or beetles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 06511, South Korea
Related Publications (10)
Suh JW, Mehran R, Claessen BE, Xu K, Baber U, Dangas G, Parise H, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B, Grines CL, Guagliumi G, Kornowski R, Wohrle J, Dudek D, Weisz G, Stone GW. Impact of in-hospital major bleeding on late clinical outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.021.
PMID: 21996385BACKGROUNDEikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006 Aug 22;114(8):774-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612812. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
PMID: 16908769BACKGROUNDPusateri AE, Holcomb JB, Kheirabadi BS, Alam HB, Wade CE, Ryan KL. Making sense of the preclinical literature on advanced hemostatic products. J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):674-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196672.47783.fd.
PMID: 16531876BACKGROUNDArbel J, Rozenbaum E, Reges O, Neuman Y, Levi A, Erel J, Haskia AR, Caneti M, Sherf M, Mosseri M. USage of chitosan for Femoral (USF) haemostasis after percutaneous procedures: a comparative open label study. EuroIntervention. 2011 Apr;6(9):1104-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I9A192.
PMID: 21518684BACKGROUNDFerretti L, Qiu X, Villalta J, Lin G. Efficacy of BloodSTOP iX, surgicel, and gelfoam in rat models of active bleeding from partial nephrectomy and aortic needle injury. Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):1161.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.048. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
PMID: 22921708BACKGROUNDRathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M, Hakeem A, Mills JD, Palmer ND, Perry RA, Morris JL. A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov 1;76(5):660-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22615.
PMID: 20506228BACKGROUNDCong X, Huang Z, Wu J, Wang J, Wen F, Fang L, Fan M, Liang C. Randomized Comparison of 3 Hemostasis Techniques After Transradial Coronary Intervention. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):445-51. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000268.
PMID: 26002786BACKGROUNDDai N, Xu DC, Hou L, Peng WH, Wei YD, Xu YW. A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):192-6. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000115.
PMID: 24496325BACKGROUNDChoi EY, Ko YG, Kim JB, Rhee J, Park S, Choi D, Jang Y, Shim WH, Cho SY. Hemostatic efficacy of hydrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Sep;17(9):459-62.
PMID: 16145231BACKGROUNDKang SH, Han D, Kim S, Yoon CH, Park JJ, Suh JW, Cho YS, Youn TJ, Chae IH. Hemostasis pad combined with compression device after transradial coronary procedures: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181099. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28742134DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2016
First Posted
November 3, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share