Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) after surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay and perioperative complications in a range of surgical specialties. To date, ERPs has not been studied in patients presenting for spine surgery. The investigators have recently developed an interdisciplinary pathway for spine surgery patients based on the latest available evidence and guidelines. The aim of this trial is to compare the investigators enhanced recovery pathway with conventional perioperative management in patients undergoing 1-2 level posterior lumbar fusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2020
CompletedJuly 28, 2020
July 1, 2020
3.2 years
October 7, 2016
June 4, 2020
July 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Score on QoR40 Inventory.
The Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR40) is a 40-item questionnaire which assesses five dimensions of recovery after surgery and anesthesia: comfort, emotions, physical independence, patient support and pain. The QoR40 has been validated for both clinical and research use. The QoR-40 has a possible score of 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (excellent quality of recovery).
Postoperative Day 3
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Length of Stay and Time From Surgery to Meeting Discharge and Physical Therapy Goals.
Postoperative Day 5
Pain Control: Opioid Consumption.
48 hours after surgery
Pain Control: NRS Rating Scales of Pain After Physical Therapy on Postoperative Day 1
Postoperative Day 1
Time to Post-operative Oral Intake.
Postoperative Day 1
Number of Participants With Post-operative Nausea, Vomiting and Ileus
Postoperative Day 5
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Spine
EXPERIMENTALUsual Care
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
The study team emphasizes that all components of the ERP are considered standard of care at this institution. The objective of this study is to ensure that the study patients assigned to the ERP will receive these standard of care components.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient presenting for 1 or 2 level posterior lumbar fusion.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment (baseline dementia, cognitive dysfunction or inability to consent to participate).
- Kidney disease: GFR \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 months or more, irrespective of cause (Levey et al., 2012).
- Liver disease: transaminitis, cirrhosis, hepatitis, hypoalbuminemia, coagulopathy.
- Pre-existing bowel disease (inflammatory bowel disease, colectomy/ colostomy/diverticular disease).
- Allergy/intolerance/contraindication to any medication or component included in the ERAS pathway protocol.
- Patients whose primary or preferred language is not English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ellen Soffin
- Organization
- Hospital for Special Surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen Soffin, MD, PhD
Hospital for Special Surgery, NY
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2016
First Posted
October 31, 2016
Study Start
November 28, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 28, 2020
Results First Posted
July 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07