Study Stopped
Funding n/a
Comparison of EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy With Percutaneous Liver Biopsy
Comparison of Pain Scores Between Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy and Percutaneous Liver Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
There are several ways to perform liver biopsies, including the percutaneous route (historical gold standard) and via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. The primary aim of this study is to prospectively compare patients undergoing EUS-guided liver biopsies to patients undergoing percutaneous biopsy. The investigators hypothesize that (1) patients who are randomized to undergo EUS-guided liver biopsy will rate themselves as having less pain in the 48 hours following the procedure, and (2) will have comparable histologic yield to a 2:1 matched cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedApril 19, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.4 years
October 25, 2016
April 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Universal Pain Assessment Tool (UPAT)
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain Medication Requirements
48 hours
Histologic Yield
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous liver biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be referred for liver biopsy by their hepatologist/gastroenterologist. The intervention is that these participants will undergo a percutaneous liver biopsy per standard protocol.
EUS-guided liver biopsy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be referred for liver biopsy by their hepatologist/gastroenterologist. The intervention is that these participants will undergo an endoscopic ultrasound procedure per standard protocol. The liver will be identified, and Color Doppler imaging prior to needle puncture will confirm lack of significant vascular structures within the needle path. Liver biopsies using up to 1-2 passes from the left hepatic lobe using a transgastric approach and up to 1-2 passes from the right hepatic lobe using a transduodenal bulb approach will be performed. The participant will be observed in the recovery unit for up to 60 minutes after the EUS-LB, and discharged if no pain or signs of complication.
Interventions
Participants will undergo endoscopic ultrasound per standard technique, with liver biopsy performed at that time.
Participants will undergo percutaneous liver biopsy per standard protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and older
- Eligibility for receiving conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia care
- Abnormal liver function tests with comprehensive previous evaluation (including serologic testing and cross-sectional imaging) leading to an appropriate decision to proceed with liver biopsy and/or portal pressure measurements.
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected or known malignant liver disease
- Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets \<50,000/microL)
- Severe coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \[INR\] \> 1.7 or other known coagulopathy)
- Use of antiplatelet agents within 7 days of the procedure
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (13)
Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003 Dec;38(6):1449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.022.
PMID: 14647056RESULTEisenberg E, Konopniki M, Veitsman E, Kramskay R, Gaitini D, Baruch Y. Prevalence and characteristics of pain induced by percutaneous liver biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1392-1396. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000060453.74744.17.
PMID: 12707140RESULTCaldwell SH. Controlling pain in liver biopsy, or "we will probably need to repeat the biopsy in a year or two to assess the response". Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1327-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03847.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11374664RESULTPiccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2(2):165-73. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(86)80075-7.
PMID: 3958472RESULTHuang JF, Hsieh MY, Dai CY, Hou NJ, Lee LP, Lin ZY, Chen SC, Wang LY, Hsieh MY, Chang WY, Yu ML, Chuang WL. The incidence and risks of liver biopsy in non-cirrhotic patients: An evaluation of 3806 biopsies. Gut. 2007 May;56(5):736-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.115410. No abstract available.
PMID: 17440193RESULTPerrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF. Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology. 1978 Jan;74(1):103-6.
PMID: 618417RESULTFirpi RJ, Soldevila-Pico C, Abdelmalek MF, Morelli G, Judah J, Nelson DR. Short recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsy: should we change our current practices? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep;3(9):926-9. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00294-6.
PMID: 16234032RESULTStone MA, Mayberry JF. An audit of ultrasound guided liver biopsies: a need for evidence-based practice. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996 Mar-Apr;43(8):432-4.
PMID: 8714240RESULTHollerbach S, Willert J, Topalidis T, Reiser M, Schmiegel W. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver lesions: histological and cytological assessment. Endoscopy. 2003 Sep;35(9):743-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41593.
PMID: 12929021RESULTFuccio L, Larghi A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: How to obtain a core biopsy? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(2):71-81. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.123011.
PMID: 24955336RESULTStavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, Harris MD, Pitea TC, Turi GK, Malet PF, Friedel DM, Grendell JH. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.043.
PMID: 22248599RESULTIglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21420083RESULTJohal AS, Khara HS, Maksimak MG, Diehl DL. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in pediatric patients. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Jul;3(3):191-4. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.138794.
PMID: 25184126RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marvin Ryou, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2016
First Posted
October 28, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share