Antiplaque Effect of Essential Oils With and Without Alcochol on an in Situ Model of Oral Biofilm Growth
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The accumulation and maturation of oral biofilm in the gingival margin is widely recognised to be the primary aetiological factor in the development of chronic gingivitis. Based on this association, the current treatment of gingivitis is focused on biofilm disruption, which will normally include mechanical processes, both professionally and at home. However, for patients, it is not easy to achieve a proper level of plaque control. The efficient plaque control techniques are very time consuming and require a special motivation and skills for their optimum use. It was at this point where mouthwashes become important, due to the fact that they include diverse types of antimicrobial agents to complement the results of mechanical oral hygiene measures. The essential oils have been presented as a realiable alternative to the "gold Standard" (Chlorhexidine). However, it use has been limited clinically due to their alcohol contain. Some years ago, a new alternative without alcohol has been launched to the market. This formulation has not been already deeply tested specific antiplaque studies in which the structure of the biofilm remained intact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ antiplaque effect of 2 antimicrobial agents (based on an essential oils formulation with and without alcohol) in the short term with a posterior analysis on "non-destructured" biofilm with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope combined with fluorescence staining.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 27, 2016
October 1, 2016
Same day
October 21, 2016
October 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of bacterial viability
96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Thickness in microns
96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks
Percentage of area covered by the biofilm
96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks
Study Arms (3)
Essential oils mouthwash
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 ml rinses for 30 seconds with essential oils/2 times daily (1/0/1).
essential oils without mouthwash
EXPERIMENTAL20 mL rinses for 30 seconds with essential oils without alcohol/2 times daily (1/0/1)
sterile water mouthwash
SHAM COMPARATOR20 mL rinses for 30 seconds with sterile water/2 times daily (1/0/1)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy adults.
- Minimum of 24 permanent teeth.
- No gingivitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0).
- No periodontitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0).
- Absence of untreated caries.
You may not qualify if:
- Smoker or former smoker.
- Presence of dental prostheses.
- Presence of orthodontic devices
- Antibiotic treatment or routine use of oral antiseptics in the previous 3 months.
- Presence of any systemic disease that could alter the production or composition of saliva.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Quintas V, Prada-Lopez I, Donos N, Suarez-Quintanilla D, Tomas I. Antiplaque effect of essential oils and 0.2% chlorhexidine on an in situ model of oral biofilm growth: a randomised clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0117177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117177. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25689859BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2016
First Posted
October 27, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share