Comparison of VoLumen and Breeza Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients
Prospective Comparison of VoLumen and Breeza Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients Undergoing CT and MR Enterography
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this research study, two different oral contrast materials that can be used for CT or MR enterography will be studied. This study is designed to compare which oral contrast material (VoLumen or Breeza) is preferred by pediatric patients and which provides higher quality exams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
1 year
October 4, 2016
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Degree of bowel opacification as determined by estimated percentage of overall small bowel opacification
To compare the degree of bowel opacification provided by Breeza vs. VoLumen oral contrast materials in pediatric patients undergoing CT and MR enterography. The degree of bowel opacification will be rated 0-100 percent.
1 year
Degree of bowel opacification, rated subjectively as excellent, diagnostic, suboptimal or poor
To compare the degree of bowel opacification provided by Breeza vs. VoLumen oral contrast materials in pediatric patients undergoing CT and MR enterography.
1 year
Degree of bowel distention as determined by measurement of the largest diameter, normal, small bowel loop in each of the four abdominal quadrants
To compare the degree of bowel distention, measured in millimeters, provided by Breeza vs. VoLumen oral contrast materials in pediatric patients undergoing CT and MR enterography
1 year
Degree of bowel distention rated subjectively as excellent, diagnostic, suboptimal or poor
To compare the degree of bowel distention provided by Breeza vs. VoLumen oral contrast materials in pediatric patients undergoing CT and MR enterography
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Tolerability as assessed by patient survey with respect to overall tolerability, taste and texture
1 year
Tolerability as assessed by patient survey with respect to abdominal symptoms as well as overall state of well-being
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Flavored Beverage Oral Contrast-Breeza
ACTIVE COMPARATORPediatric patients that are undergoing awake CT and MR enterography at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) base (Burnett) campus will be randomized to either VoLumen (current standard of care oral contrast) or Breeza.
Barium Sulfate Oral Contrast-VoLumen
ACTIVE COMPARATORPediatric patients that are undergoing awake CT and MR enterography at the CCHMC base (Burnett) campus will be randomized to either VoLumen (current standard of care oral contrast) or Breeza.
Interventions
Barium Sulfate Oral Contrast-VoLumen
Flavored beverage for neutral abdominal/pelvic imaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 8 years and \< 18 years
- Patients undergoing clinically indicated CT or MR enterography
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 8 years and ≥ 18 years
- Requirement for sedation for CT or MRI enterography
- Cannot drink oral contrast (will require tube administration)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Related Publications (6)
Dillman JR, Adler J, Zimmermann EM, Strouse PJ. CT enterography of pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Jan;40(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1465-5. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
PMID: 19936733BACKGROUNDMollard BJ, Smith EA, Dillman JR. Pediatric MR enterography: technique and approach to interpretation-how we do it. Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):29-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14122449.
PMID: 25531478BACKGROUNDTowbin AJ, Sullivan J, Denson LA, Wallihan DB, Podberesky DJ. CT and MR enterography in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(7):1843-60. doi: 10.1148/rg.337105140.
PMID: 24224581BACKGROUNDYoung BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F, Paulsen S, Fidler J, Johnson CD, Huprich J, Barlow J, Trout A. Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jan-Feb;32(1):32-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318061961d.
PMID: 18303285BACKGROUNDAbsah I, Bruining DH, Matsumoto JM, Weisbrod AJ, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Faubion WA Jr. MR enterography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective assessment of patient tolerance, image quality, and initial performance estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):W367-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8363.
PMID: 22915428BACKGROUNDKolbe AB, Fletcher JG, Froemming AT, Sheedy SP, Koo CW, Pundi K, Bruining DH, Tung J, Harmsen WS, Barlow JM, Fidler JL. Evaluation of Patient Tolerance and Small-Bowel Distention With a New Small-Bowel Distending Agent for Enterography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):994-1002. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15260. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
PMID: 26998661BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan Dillman, MD, MSc
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2016
First Posted
October 27, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share