Loading search results
WEANING
Comparison of Two Ventilatory Modes During Spontaneous Breathing Trial in Intubated Patients
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
OTHER · ANSM Number
interventional
20
1 country
1
Study Start
August 23, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)Patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are at some point eligible for weaning. The common way to wean them from mechanical ventilation is to screen criteria for feasibility and, if present, to test feasibility by performing spontaneous breathing trial. This latter can be done either by setting a low pressure support level (expected to compensate the airflow resistance due to endotracheal tube) or by allowing the patient to breathe spontaneously through the tube without any support from the ventilator. Combination of low pressure assistance strategy (7 cm H2O) and positive expiratory pressure (PEP) of 4 cm H2O is the strategy used in our unit. Such a low pressure support level should actually result in a real assistance and, hence this is not the real spontaneous breathing capacity that is tested. Some ICU ventilators offer the option of compensating for the airflow resistance due to endotracheal tube, automatic tube compensation (ATC). Therefore, investigators aimed at comparing in patients ready to wean the usual procedure in our ICU and the ATC mode. In the ATC arm, the patients are breathing spontaneously through the endotracheal tube and are connected to the ventilator set at inspiratory pressure support of 0 cm H2O, PEP 4 cm H2O and ATC on. Two parallel arms depending on the order of allocation of each mode: pressure support 7 cm H2O + PEP 4 cm H2O then ATC or the opposite. The primary endpoint is the power of the work of breathing. The hypothesis is that the power of the work of breathing is greater in ATC than in the usual procedure, and hence this latter is a real ventilator support.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 19, 2016
Actual (reported)October 20, 2016
Actual (reported)August 23, 2017
Actual (reported)October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)the power of work of breathing
the work of breathing is measured from the area subtended by the esophageal pressure - lung volume relationship. The power of work of breathing is obtained by multiplying work of breathing by the respiratory frequency and expressed in Joules/min
30 minutes after onset the ventilator strategy
Respiratory rate
30 minutes
tidal volume
30 minutes
intrinsic PEP
30 minutes
occlusion pressure at 100 ms
30 minutes
work of breathing per liter
30 minutes
spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC
ventilator is set to pressure support ventilation mode at set pressure 7 cm H2O above PEEP level of 4 cm H2O
spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O during 30 minutes then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O
30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69004, France
Guerin C, Terzi N, Mezidi M, Baboi L, Chebib N, Yonis H, Argaud L, Heunks L, Louis B. Low-pressure support vs automatic tube compensation during spontaneous breathing trial for weaning. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0611-y.
Claude Guerin, Pr
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
20 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 19, 2016
First Posted
October 20, 2016
Study Start
August 23, 2017
Actual (reported)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 5, 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: