PRostate Evaluation for Clinically Important Disease: MRI vs Standard Evaluation Procedures
PRECISE
A Phase III Multi-centre Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy Compared to Systematic Trans-rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Guided Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of MRI-targeted biopsy compared to standard of care systematic TRUS guided biopsy in the detection of clinically significant and clinically insignificant prostate cancer in men without prior biopsy. The implication of this trial is that MRI-targeted biopsy could replace systematic TRUS guided biopsy as the standard of care in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Nov 2016
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 22, 2018
January 1, 2018
3 years
September 28, 2016
February 20, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MRI-The proportion of men with clinically significant cancer (Gleason > 7)
To determine whether the proportion of men with clinically significant cancer (Gleason \> 7) detected by MRI-targeted biopsy is no less than systematic TRUS guided biopsy.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Biopsy-The proportion of men with clinically significant cancer (Gleason ≥7)
1 year
Proportion of men in each arm with clinically insignificant cancer
1 year
Proportion of men in each arm with Gleason >4+3 detected.
1 year
Proportion of men in MRI arm who avoid biopsy.
1 year
Proportion of men in the MRI arm whom the PI-RADS score for suspicion of clinically significant cancer was 3, 4 or 5 but no clinically significant cancer was detected.
1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MRI
OTHERMen in Arm A will undergo a MRI followed by either a targeted biopsy of suspicious areas or will be followed for two years if there is no suspicious areas identified by MRI. The unbiopsied men will have a repeat MRI at 2 years.
Standard of Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORMen in Arm B will undergo a 12-core systematic TRUS guided biopsy. All men in the study will be followed for two years or until they have had radical treatment (whichever comes first).
Interventions
Men in Arm B will undergo a 12-core systematic TRUS guided biopsy. All men in the study will be followed for two years or until they have had radical treatment (whichever comes first).
Men will undergo a MRI followed by either a targeted biopsy of suspicious areas or will be followed for two years if there is no suspicious areas identified by MRI.
Men will undergo a MRI followed by either a targeted biopsy of suspicious areas or will be followed for two years if there is no suspicious areas identified by MRI.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy;
- ≥5% chance of high-grade prostate cancer as calculated using individualized risk assessment of prostate cancer calculator, PCPTRC 2.0, found at http://deb.uthscsa.edu/URORiskCalc/Pages/calcs.jsp;
- Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml within 3 months of randomization
- Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol;
- Able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior prostate biopsy
- Prior treatment for prostate cancer
- Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated GFR ≤ 50mls/min)
- Contraindication to prostate biopsy
- Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI, i.e. previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work
- Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Canadian Urology Research Consortiumlead
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Researchcollaborator
- Prostate Cancer Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z1M9, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre-Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A5W9, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X6, Canada
CIUSSS du Centre-Ouest-de-I'ile-de-Montreal-Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T1E2, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Klotz L, Chin J, Black PC, Finelli A, Anidjar M, Machado A, Levental M, Ghai S, Chang SD, Patel C, Kassam Z, Loblaw A, Kebabdjian M, Pond G, Haider MA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE). Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
PMID: 37838556DERIVEDKlotz L, Chin J, Black PC, Finelli A, Anidjar M, Bladou F, Mercado A, Levental M, Ghai S, Chang SD, Milot L, Patel C, Kassam Z, Moore C, Kasivisvanathan V, Loblaw A, Kebabdjian M, Earle CC, Pond GR, Haider MA. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7589.
PMID: 33538782DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2016
First Posted
October 18, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 22, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Plan to share publication