NCT02935920

Brief Summary

Background: In February 2015 the Danish Health and Medicines Authority published new clinical guidelines describing how cancer patients should be followed. It is recommended that patients receiving specific oncological treatment such as endocrine therapy be followed at the department of oncology responsible for the treatment and providing the medication. There is no evidence that routine examinations improve overall survival after breast cancer. Mammography is the only specific examination to be offered to asymptomatic women after treatment for breast cancer Aims of the study: The hypothesis is that individualized follow-up with the introduction of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data will help postmenopausal women regain control of health related self-care and encourage them to a larger extent to take part in their follow-up after cancer treatment. This is believed to improve the health related quality of life and increase the positive experience of the follow-up program. Design: Patients are randomly assigned to the department's standard control program or an individualized solution in the context of shared decision making. PRO data will be used to evaluate the patient's need for consultations. Primary outcome: Evaluation of the experience and feasibility of PRO data in connection with individualized follow-up of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Systematically applying PRO data we will uncover patient needs, empower the patients to take part in shared decision making, and improve the current follow-up in the sense of a more patient-centered care and tailored follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
134

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 11, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 3, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 18, 2016

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

August 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PRO, follow up

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The difference in PREM (patient reported experience measure) as reported by patients in the individualized and standard follow-up groups, respectively

    Every three months the patients in both groups are requested to fill out a patient satisfaction questionnaire (PEQ) concerning their follow-up program. A single item with scores between 1 and 5 will be used to evaluate the difference between the 2 groups (1 is very satisfied and 5 is very dissatisfied)

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Comparison of resources spent on individualized follow-up based on PRO-data and standard follow-up.

    2 years

  • The difference in CollaboRATE-score between the individualized and standard follow-up.

    2 years

  • Comparison of Health related quality of life in the individualized follow-up versus standard follow-up.

    2 years

  • Elucidation of issues of importance and concern to postmenopausal woman with breast cancer in adjuvant endocrine therapy during follow-up after primary treatment. What symptoms and side effects trouble them most during follow-up?

    2 years

  • Evaluation of current information level during primary treatment

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Individual, tailored follow-up

EXPERIMENTAL

Patient symptoms are evaluated by the use of PRO-data to uncover the needs of a consultation. The outcome of the questionnaire is used to customize the follow-up program to the individual patient.

Behavioral: Individualized, tailored follow-up program

Standard follow-up

NO INTERVENTION

Scheduled clinical examination every six months throughout the course of adjuvant treatment. Performed by a doctor or nurse.

Interventions

Individualized follow-up in the context of shared decision making, with the use of PRO-data to evaluate the patient needs of consultations.

Individual, tailored follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 95 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Postmenopausal at the time of diagnosis (menostasis \> 12 months. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy)
  • Complete disease remission after primary operation
  • Histologically confirmed hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, 1% or more of the tumor cells express hormone receptors
  • High-risk profile with a 10-year recurrence of more than 10%
  • Planned adjuvant endocrine therapy regardless of other adjuvant therapy to be initiated within 1 month or initiated within the last 9 months.
  • Written and verbally informed consent
  • Able to read and speak Danish
  • Access to a computer and an email-account

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient followed regularly as part of a research protocol
  • Women postmenopausal due to surgery on the ovaries/uterus age \< 50
  • Prognostic low grade risk of recurrence (tumor size 10 mm or less, lymph node negative, ductal carcinoma grade 1 and lobular carcinoma grade 1 or 2)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vejle hospital, Department of Oncology

Vejle, Region of Southen Denmark, 7100, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Karina D. Steffensen, MD, PhD

    Vejle Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Cathrine L. Riis, MD

    Vejle Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2016

First Posted

October 18, 2016

Study Start

April 11, 2016

Primary Completion

June 30, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations