Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Trial Assessing the Survival Impact of Phone Advice
CONTAC
1 other identifier
interventional
729
1 country
19
Brief Summary
Medical call center have no phone advice protocol within out of hospital cardiac arrest in France. The purpose of the present study is to compare a group of patients with protocol phone advice delivered by the dispatchers ("CONTARM" group) versus usual phone advice ( "CONTHAB" group). Comparison will be performed on survival to seven days. The hypothesis is that CONTARM group has an higher survival at seven days. A second goal is to measure the survival to 15 and 30 days. The trial is randomized, controlled and will include 2600 patients. The patients will be enrolled in 19 hospitals in France.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 19, 2021
CompletedJanuary 16, 2025
January 1, 2020
5 years
July 26, 2016
January 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
7 days survival
7 days survival
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
15 and 30 days survival
15 and 30 days
Assessment of compliance of phone advice
7 days
30 days neurological status
30 days
Study Arms (2)
CONTARM
EXPERIMENTALProtocol phone advice
CONTHAB
OTHERUsual phone advice
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \> 18 years old
- initial call to 15
- out of hospital cardiac arrest
- patient proximity to witness
You may not qualify if:
- first aid professionals on site
- rigor mortis
- location not allowing resuscitation
- inability to realize actions or misunderstanding
- no flow \> 5 minutes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besanconlead
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijoncollaborator
- Central Hospital, Nancy, Francecollaborator
- University Hospital, Metzcollaborator
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, Francecollaborator
- Reims University hospitalcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Lons Le Sauniercollaborator
- Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsacecollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Colmarcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Troyescollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Chalon sur Saônecollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmescollaborator
- Nantes University Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital, Bordeauxcollaborator
- Hospices Civils de Lyoncollaborator
- Poitiers University Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital, Angerscollaborator
- University Hospital, Orléanscollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier de Montaubancollaborator
Study Sites (19)
CHU Angers
Angers, France
CHU Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
CH Châlon sur Saône
Châlon Sur Saône, France
CH Colmar
Colmar, France
CHU Dijon
Dijon, France
CH Lons Le Saunier
Lons-le-Saunier, France
CHU Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU Metz
Metz, France
CH Montauban
Montauban, France
CH Mulhouse
Mulhouse, France
CHU Nancy
Nancy, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, France
CH Orléans
Orléans, France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, France
CHU Reims
Reims, France
CHU Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
CH Troyes
Troyes, France
Related Publications (5)
Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, Lerner EB, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Swor RA. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S685-705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939.
PMID: 20956221BACKGROUNDNolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, Koster RW, Wyllie J, Bottiger B; ERC Guidelines Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1219-76. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021. No abstract available.
PMID: 20956052BACKGROUNDKoster RW, Baubin MA, Bossaert LL, Caballero A, Cassan P, Castren M, Granja C, Handley AJ, Monsieurs KG, Perkins GD, Raffay V, Sandroni C. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1277-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.009. No abstract available.
PMID: 20956051BACKGROUNDDesmettre T, Jenvrin J, Freysz M, Nace L, Puyraveau M, Berthier F, Dreyfus P, Philippe MH, Labourey JM, Capellier G. Drug prescription at the medical call center. Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence (2013) 3:14-19.
BACKGROUNDSigaux A, Jonquet S, Puyraveau M, Bretillot L, Labourey JM, Capellier G, Desmettre T. Evaluation of phone advice delivered by a medical call center in case of cardiac arrest. Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence (2014) 4:11-17.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2016
First Posted
October 17, 2016
Study Start
October 12, 2016
Primary Completion
October 12, 2021
Study Completion
October 19, 2021
Last Updated
January 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2020-01