Effectiveness of Flash Mediation Therapy
Study on Effectiveness of Flash Mediation Therapy in the Context of Acute Psychological and Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia in Nursing Homes
1 other identifier
interventional
241
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In order to offer a non-drug intervention for caregivers in nursing home to respond promptly to a behavioral crisis with an appropriate response to each patient, a chariot has been developed by the Institute of Ageing Well Korian (Institut du Bien Vieillir Korian) to bring together eleven mediation activities. These activities lasting about 15 minutes are based on emotion (reminiscent, games) and sensory interventions (music, massage, touch) to decentralize patient stimulus that disturbs and focus on a subject not disruptive. This emergency intervention should provide a reduction in Behavioral and Psychological Symptom of Dementia (BPSD) of nursing home patients. The main objective is to measure its immediate effect on productive symptoms (agitation, aberrant motor behavior and disinhibition). The secondary objectives are to measure its immediate impact on the well-being and psychotropic treatments, and measure its effect after two months and after four months on all BPSD with a focus on agitation, the administration of psychotropic drugs, the hospitalizations and the number of falls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 2, 2017
August 1, 2017
10 months
October 12, 2016
November 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in number of disorders
the number of disorders are evaluated with Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) before and 30 minutes after each intervention. The original version of the CMAI is initially planned to study the frequency of these disorders. However, the goal being to study the decrease in productive symptoms, after using the "chariot-flash", only the number of this item will be considered (between 0 and 29). For example in this modified version, for the item "pace, aimless wandering" nursing team can answer "present" or "absent" instead of (never, less than once a week, once or twice per week, a few times over week, one to two times daily, several times a day, several times per hour)
until 4 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in score of well-being
until 4 months
change in psychotropic drugs prescribed
until 4 months
change in score of BPSD
before the beginning of the study, at 2 months, 4 months and 6 months
change in level of agitation
before the beginning of the study, at 2 months, 4 months and 6 months
change in the number of administered psychotropic drugs.
before the beginning of the study, at 2 months, 4 months and 6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
2 months control condition - 4 months chariot-flash
EXPERIMENTAL200 patient , in 15 nursing homes randomly will be exposed two months in the control condition (usual intervention) and 4 months in the experimental condition (chariot-flash intervention). The experimental condition is to propose the "chariot-flash" in emergency during the emergence or increase of productive symptoms.
4 months control condition-2 months chariot flash
EXPERIMENTAL200 patient, in 14 other nursing homes will be exposed 4 months in the control condition and 2 months in the experimental condition
Interventions
The control condition is to propose the usual procedures for the management of productive symptoms during the emergence or increase of these symptoms. The "chariot-flash" condition is a chariot with eleven drawers. Each drawer contains an activity (lasting about 15 minutes): * Boards of known photographs to recall autobiographical memories * Newspapers to read, talk, associate memories around an article * Massage Oil, refreshing wipes, cream to reconnect with the body * Clay, cookie pieces, washable felt and paper to create shapes, draw. * Walk with a person of the healthcare team the case of behavioral disorders in type of ambulation and untimely exit . * Listening to music * Relaxation-Breathing * Cushion, foam balls to vent his energy on secure hardware. * Plush doll or to invest a vector object of affection and empathy * Sensory flash balls that the patient can squeeze, throw, roll. * Games with which the patient can play according to its possibilities.
The control condition is to propose the usual procedures for the management of productive symptoms during the emergence or increase of these symptoms. The "chariot-flash" condition is a chariot with eleven drawers. Each drawer contains an activity (lasting about 15 minutes): * Boards of known photographs to recall autobiographical memories * Newspapers to read, talk, associate memories around an article * Massage Oil, refreshing wipes, cream to reconnect with the body * Clay, cookie pieces, washable felt and paper to create shapes, draw. * Walk with a person of the healthcare team the case of behavioral disorders in type of ambulation and untimely exit . * Listening to music * Relaxation-Breathing * Cushion, foam balls to vent his energy on secure hardware. * Plush doll or to invest a vector object of affection and empathy * Sensory flash balls that the patient can squeeze, throw, roll. * Games with which the patient can play according to its possibilities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- People ability to object and does not oppose either by themselves or through a trusted person referred to in Article L. 1111-6 of the Code of Public Health, failing thereof, by the family, or, if a person talking to the person close and stable ties. For adults under guardianship, permission must be given by the legal representative of the person. The research will benefit from the backing of Persons Protection Committee (PPC) prior to its implementation;
- Man or woman over 60 years;
- patient living in one of the nursing homes participating in the project;
- Patient completing the diagnostic criteria for major neurocognitive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V criteria (DSM-V)
- The patient must have at least one of these productive symptoms (agitation, aberrant motor behavior, disinhibition) listed by the NPI-NH (score\> 2 at least one of these items)
You may not qualify if:
- Deafness or blindness may compromise patient assessment or participation in the intervention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital des Charpennes Centre de Recherche Clinique "Vieillissement-Cerveau-Fragilité"
Lyon, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre Krolak Salmon
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2016
First Posted
October 14, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share