Child Characteristics, Neuromarkers, and Intervention Components Impacting Treatment Outcome: CCT, TF-CBT, TAU
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study is designed to examine three treatment conditions for traumatized youth: Cue-Centered Treatment (CCT), Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), and Treatment as Usual (TAU) to determine which treatment works most effectively for which youth. The investigators would like to determine feasibility of training on the treatment interventions. In addition, this study aims to inform development of systems of care for chronically traumatized youth. The investigators hope to determine whether 1) TF-CBT and CCT will have better outcomes than TAU, 2) Child characteristics predict better outcome in either TF-CBT or CCT and to identify which phases of treatment are most effective, and 3) Imaging findings will be predictors of improved outcome. This research is important because while there are many existing trauma interventions for youth, little is known about what is most essential in those interventions. This study will shed light on what components of treatment are most effective. Furthermore, there are minimal guidelines on how to select the most appropriate intervention for a particular child. This study will contribute to that knowledge by informing which interventions are suited best for which youth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2021
CompletedApril 8, 2021
March 1, 2021
3.3 years
October 4, 2016
November 1, 2020
March 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Reaction Index for DSM 5 (Child Self-report)
The UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM 5 is a 31 item self-report measure with child and caregiver versions. The total severity score ranging from 0-80 is obtained by summing the four symptom category sub-scales (criteria B, C, D, \& E). A higher score corresponds to greater PTSD severity. The items map onto the DSM 5 criteria for PTSD as well as assessing for dissociative subtype.
Baseline and month 3 (end of treatment)
Change From Baseline in UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Reaction Index for DSM 5 (Parent Report)
The UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM 5 is a 31 item self-report measure with child and caregiver versions. Scores range from 0 to 80 (higher score indicates more sever PTSD symptoms). The items map onto the DSM-V criteria for PTSD as well as assessing for dissociative subtype.
Baseline and month 3 (end of treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Children's Depression Inventory (CDI 2)
Baseline and month 3 (end of treatment)
Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC 2)
Baseline and month 3 (end of treatment)
Change From Baseline in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) (Parent Report)
Baseline to month 3 (end of treatment)
Study Arms (3)
Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)
EXPERIMENTALCue-Centered Therapy provides 15 sessions of treatment. Focuses on developing skills in recognizing stress cues and coping skills. Taught to self-soothe without the active involvement of a guardian. Teaches emotional, cognitive, and physiological conditioning to deal with ongoing traumatic stress. Will have a fNIR (NIRScout) scan at 4 time points throughout study (baseline, midpoint, end of treatment, and 3 month post-treatment)
Trauma-Focused CBT (TF-CBT)
EXPERIMENTALTrauma-Focused CBT provides 15 sessions of treatment. Focuses on reframing subconscious thought and emotions with emotional and cognitive conditioning. Uses the active involvement and support of guardians. Addresses discrete traumatic incidents in the past. Will have a fNIR (NIRScout) scan at 4 time points throughout study (baseline, midpoint, end of treatment, and 3 month post-treatment)
Treatment as Usual (TAU)
EXPERIMENTALTAU is the current Standard treatment at Stanford Youth Solutions will serve as the control. The treatment is known as flexible integrated services. Will have a fNIR (NIRScout) scan at 4 time points throughout study (baseline, midpoint, end of treatment, and 3 month post-treatment)
Interventions
Identify stress reactions and develop coping skills to deal with them independently. Helps address ongoing traumatic stressors.
Identifies negative cognitive/emotional patterns and helps re-frame them. Uses active support from guardians and focuses on emotional and cognitive conditioning. Focuses on discrete past incidents.
The control group. The standard treatment utilized at Stanford Youth Solutions
The device is a portable Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) recording unit. NIRS technology uses specific wavelengths of light, introduced at the scalp to enable the non-invasive measurement of changes in the relative ratios of deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) and oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) in the capillary beds during brain activity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Exposure to at least one traumatic event and endorsement of any trauma symptoms on the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-V
- Ages 7-18
- Willingness to participate in therapy and fNIRs imaging
- Caregiver willing to participate in the study
- Perpetrator of the traumatic event is not living in the home with the child
You may not qualify if:
- Low cognitive functioning (IQ less than 70)
- Substance dependence as defined by DSM criteria
- Autism/Schizophrenia
- Clinically significant medical illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Stanford Youth Solutionscollaborator
- Drexel Universitycollaborator
- Iowa State Universitycollaborator
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Stanford Youth Solutions
Sacramento, California, 95826, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was underpowered because the number of participants with analyzable data did not meet the threshold for the planned analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Hilit Kletter
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Victor G Carrion, M.D.
Stanford University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hilit Kletter, PhD
Stanford University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Flint Espil, PhD
Stanford Univeristy
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor-Med CTR LIne
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2016
First Posted
October 6, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 24, 2020
Study Completion
April 24, 2020
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Results First Posted
April 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share