Discrepancies Between Patients and Physicians in Their Perceptions of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity
DIAPO
Discordance Dans l'évaluation d'Activité de la Polyarthrite Rhumatoide
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients and physicians often differ in their perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, as quantified by the patient's global assessment (PGA) and by the evaluator's global assessment (EGA). The objectives of this study were:
- 1.to explore the extent and reasons for the discordance between patients and physicians in their perception of RA disease activity
- 2.to determine if this discordance at baseline is associated with RA outcomes at 1 year (remission, function and structure) in early arthritis (EA) in daily clinical practice.
- 3.Patients: from the French cohort of early arthritis (EA) ESPOIR³ (at least 2 swollen joints for less than 6 months, DMARD naïve), fulfilling the ACR-EULAR criteria for RA at baseline Analysis: At baseline, agreement between PGA and EGA (Bland-Altman plot) was assessed. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the patient and EA features independently associated with discordance (calculated as PGA - EGA). Logistic regression was used to analyze discordance as│PGA - EGA│≥20. Multivariate logistic models were used to determine if discordance at baseline is associated with remissions (Boolean, SDAI and DAS28), functional stability (HAQ≤0.5 and deltaHAQ≤0.25) and absence of radiographic progression (delta Sharp score\<1) after 1 year of follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2016
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2019
January 1, 2019
2.1 years
September 16, 2016
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient's global assessment
The discordance between the patient's and the evaluator's global assessment will be calculated.
day 0
Evaluator's global assessment
The discordance between the patient's and the evaluator's global assessment will be calculated.
day 0
Eligibility Criteria
from the south of France (Nîmes, Montpellier, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Limoge), fulfilling the ACR-EULAR criteria for RA
You may qualify if:
- fulfilling the ACR-EULAR criteria for RA
You may not qualify if:
- no RA
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, Gard, 30000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cécile Gaujoux-Viala, MD, PhD
CHU Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2016
First Posted
October 5, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01