Are Geriatric Out-patient Care Better Than Usual Care?
Are Care Given by a Geriatric Hospital-Based Out Patient-Care Team Better Than Usual Care? - a Randomised Controlled Trial (The GerOP-Ca-trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Frailty and multimorbidity is one of the biggest challenges of todays health care due to the demographic development with more and more elderly surviving many diseases that was mortal just a few decades ago. Health care in Sweden is one of the best in the world, yet many frail older people do not receive appropriate health care. Several reports have described a fragmented care with lack of good quality due to lack of a holistic view on the patient and her situation. At the same time the care given is costly and ineffective with a lack of continuity. Additionally, there are a lack of hospital beds in Sweden due to the ageing population and a cut down of beds in the last decades. There is though a method, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), where studies have shown many benefits for older patients including less need of hospital beds, better functional outcomes and a better chance of living at home after an Acute Hospital Discharge, but this method is not much used in Sweden. The aim of this study is to show that CGA in an Out-patient Care Setting save hospital beds without decreasing the quality of care measured by sustained functional capacity. Other parameters to be evaluated are mortality, degree of frailty, health economy, quality of life, and cognition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2020
CompletedJanuary 13, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.6 years
September 26, 2016
January 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Days in hospital
Register data
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Short Physical Performance Battery
12 months
Short Physical Performance Battery
24 months
ADL-staircase (21)
12 months
ADL-staircase (21)
24 months
Frailty phenotype - Unintentional weight loss
24 months
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intervention
EXPERIMENTALComprehensive Geriatric Assessment
control
NO INTERVENTIONStandard care
Interventions
The CGA is person-centered and unique for each patient, but is based on the core elements such as socio-demographic background, social network, health and medical history, medications, functional status, cognitive status, nutritional status, somatic status and psychosocial status including depression, providing a comprehensive assessment tailored for each person.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Years
- visits in the Emergency Room (ER) during the previous 18 months
- diagnoses according to ICD-10.
You may not qualify if:
- people living outside the Municipalities of Helsingborg, Åstorp, Bjuv and Höganäs municipality
- living in nursing homes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
Study Sites (1)
Helsingborg Hospital
Helsingborg, 25167, Sweden
Related Publications (11)
Wieland D, Hirth V. Comprehensive geriatric assessment. Cancer Control. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):454-62. doi: 10.1177/107327480301000603.
PMID: 14652521BACKGROUNDPrestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1623-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
PMID: 25662415BACKGROUNDFried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):255-63. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255.
PMID: 15031310BACKGROUNDClegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
PMID: 23395245BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDMorley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, Cesari M, Chumlea WC, Doehner W, Evans J, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Katz PR, Malmstrom TK, McCarter RJ, Gutierrez Robledo LM, Rockwood K, von Haehling S, Vandewoude MF, Walston J. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022.
PMID: 23764209BACKGROUNDWarnier RM, van Rossum E, van Velthuijsen E, Mulder WJ, Schols JM, Kempen GI. Validity, Reliability and Feasibility of Tools to Identify Frail Older Patients in Inpatient Hospital Care: A Systematic Review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016 Feb;20(2):218-30. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0567-z.
PMID: 26812520BACKGROUNDJones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Nov;52(11):1929-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x.
PMID: 15507074BACKGROUNDEkdahl AW, Alwin J, Eckerblad J, Husberg M, Jaarsma T, Mazya AL, Milberg A, Krevers B, Unosson M, Wiklund R, Carlsson P. Long-Term Evaluation of the Ambulatory Geriatric Assessment: A Frailty Intervention Trial (AGe-FIT): Clinical Outcomes and Total Costs After 36 Months. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26805750BACKGROUNDEkdahl AW, Wirehn AB, Alwin J, Jaarsma T, Unosson M, Husberg M, Eckerblad J, Milberg A, Krevers B, Carlsson P. Costs and Effects of an Ambulatory Geriatric Unit (the AGe-FIT Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jun 1;16(6):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.074. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PMID: 25703450BACKGROUNDEkdahl AW, Axmon A, Sandberg M, Steen Carlsson K. Is care based on comprehensive geriatric assessment with mobile teams better than usual care? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (The GerMoT study). BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 10;8(10):e023969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023969.
PMID: 30309994DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne W Ekdahl
Region Skåne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2016
First Posted
October 5, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 15, 2020
Study Completion
June 15, 2020
Last Updated
January 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share