Comparative Effectiveness of MRgFUS Versus CTgRFA for Osteoid Osteomas
Phase III Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound With Computed Tomography Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Osteoid Osteomas
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Osteoid osteomas are painful, benign bone tumors that occur most frequently in young males between ages 10 and 20 years. The goal of the proposed study is based on the premise that MRgFUS is noninferior to CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (CTgRFA), in terms of pain reduction following treatment of osteoid osteomas, and offers possible improvements with regards to 1) post-procedural pain, 2) clinical resource utilization, 3) patient experience, and/or 4) adverse events. The data from the current study would provide clinicians important information in deciding between treatment options for ablation of osteoid osteomas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
February 1, 2025
8.3 years
September 30, 2016
February 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of resolution of pain (worst visual analog scale score over last 24 hours < 2.0)
1 month after treatment, worst VAS score over the last 24 hours will be assessed
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Procedure time
Treatment day
Patient preference
2 weeks
Patient quality of life
1 month
Medication use
5 days before, five days after, 1 month after
Adverse events
1 month
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MRgFUS
ACTIVE COMPARATORMagnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation
CTgRFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORComputed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women ages ≥ 8 years old.
- Patients must have medically uncontrolled pain from an osteoid osteoma, as defined by pain, which, in the view of the referring orthopedic oncologist significantly interferes with that patient's activities of daily living. Pain may be refractory to management with medications because of inadequate pain control, or because of side effects of the pain medication.
- If patients have an additional site of pain, it must be 2 points less severe and distinguishable from the pain at the osteoid osteoma site.
- Patients (or guardians/parents) who are able and willing to give consent (or assent where applicable) and able to attend all study visits.
- No prior interventional therapy for the osteoid osteoma.
- Able to safely undergo MRI exam, tolerate being in an MRI scanner, and receive anesthesia/sedation for the treatment.
- Targeted bone/tumor interface is accessible to the ExAblate device and located in a rib, extremity (excluding intra-articular location), pelvis, shoulders (including clavicles), or the sternum.
- Targeted lesion must be deeper than 1 cm from the skin.
- Targeted lesion must be clearly visible by non-contrast MRI.
- Karnofsky Performance Status \> 60.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients a) who need surgical stabilization of the affected bone (elevated fracture risk) or b) whose targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site, as determined by the referring orthopedic oncologist.
- Targeted tumor in the skull/spine.
- Targeted tumor is \< 1 cm from a major nerve.
- Pregnancy.
- Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g. pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
- Patients with unstable cardiac status including: patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs, unstable angina pectoris, documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry, congestive heart failure requiring medication (other than diuretic).
- Severe hypertension (diastolic BP \> 100 on medication)
- Patients with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices.
- Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
- Severe cerebrovascular disease.
- Known intolerance or allergy to medications used for sedation/anesthesia.
- Known intolerance or allergy to MR contrast agent (gadolinium chelates).
- Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
- Patients with persistent pain undistinguishable from the target lesion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Matthew Bucknorlead
- Focused Ultrasound Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Stanford Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States
UCSF Imaging Center
San Francisco, California, 94107, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Bucknor, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor in Residence
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2016
First Posted
October 4, 2016
Study Start
March 28, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share