Intracervical Lidocaine Versus Intramuscular Diclofenac for Pain Relief in HSG in a Tertiary Hospital in Kano
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Versus Intramuscular Diclofenac for Pain Relief During Hysterosalpingography Among Infertile Women In A Tertiary Hospital In Kano: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the effect of intracervical block with 1% lidocaine and intramuscular diclofenac 75mg in decreasing pain perception during hysterosalpingography. Half of participants will receive intracervical block with 1% lidocaine, while the other half will receive intramuscular diclofenac 75mg.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
September 1, 2016
5 months
September 25, 2016
September 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Visual Analogue Score
A detailed description of the visual analogue scale (VAS) will be given personally to each woman prior to the procedure. The VAS included a 10 cm linear scale on which 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst pain imaginable'. All patients will be asked to grade their perceived lower abdominal pain levels during specified stages of HSG using the VAS as explained to them. The scale will be used at different stages of the procedure: (1) before beginning the procedure; (2) after speculum application but before instrumentation; (3) after the application of the tenaculum and metal cannula and just before the injection of contrast medium; (4) at the end of uterine filling with contrast medium;
Preprocedure and procedure time 0
Secondary Outcomes (3)
patient's satisfaction with pain relief in the two groups using Likert scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes post procedure and 24 hours post procedure
Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 30 minutes post procedure
5 minutes and 30 minutes
Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 24 hours post procedure
5 minutes and 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Intracervical lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALThis group will comprise of patients that will receive the intracervical block. The study group will receive a total of 60 mg (6 mL) of 1% lidocaine to be injected at four points (12, 4, 6, and 8 o'clock) circumferentially into the cervix (1.5 mL at each point) 5 minutes before proceeding with the hysterosalpingogram.
Intramuscular Diclofenac
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will comprise of patients that will receive intramuscular diclofenac potassium 75mg 30 minutes before proceeding with the hysterosalpingogram.
Interventions
Intracervical lidocaine injected at four different points
Intramuscular Diclofenac 30 mins before HSG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All women with infertility who will be undergoing a hysterosalpingography, and must have given consent will be recruited into the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of any allergies to local anaesthetics, radio-opaque dye, or anti-inflammatory medications
- All patients with active pelvic inflammatory diseases
- All patients with chronic pelvic pain
- Patients with history of cervical surgery
- Other indications for hysterosalpingography like Ashermans syndrome, congenital uterine anomalies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital
Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
Related Publications (8)
Hamilton M. Infertilty. In Edmonds K (Editor). Dewhurst's Textbook of obstetrics and gynecology. 8th edition. John Wiley and sons ltd 2012 567-79.
BACKGROUNDHacivelioglu S, Gencer M, Cakir Gungor A, Kosar S, Koc E, Cosar E. Can the addition of a paracervical block to systemic or local analgesics improve the pain perceived by the patient during hysterosalpingography? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jan;34(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.828025.
PMID: 24359050BACKGROUNDChauhan MB, Lakra P, Jyotsna D, Nanda S, Malhotra V. Pain relief during hysterosalpingography: role of intracervical block. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2515-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
PMID: 22926800BACKGROUNDRobinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247645.52211.41.
PMID: 17197592BACKGROUNDAhmad G, Duffy J, Watson AJ. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD006106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006106.pub2.
PMID: 17443612BACKGROUNDSinnatamby CS editor. Last's Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 11th Edition. Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone; 2006. P 311-6.
BACKGROUNDCostello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03362-9.
PMID: 12414003BACKGROUNDSimpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study. Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):419-31. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055109.
PMID: 16549607BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sulaiman D Muhammad, MBBS
Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2016
First Posted
September 29, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09