NCT02918812

Brief Summary

This study compares the effect of intracervical block with 1% lidocaine and intramuscular diclofenac 75mg in decreasing pain perception during hysterosalpingography. Half of participants will receive intracervical block with 1% lidocaine, while the other half will receive intramuscular diclofenac 75mg.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2017

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 25, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

HysterosalpingographyPain reliefInfertilityIntracervical blockDiclofenac

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Visual Analogue Score

    A detailed description of the visual analogue scale (VAS) will be given personally to each woman prior to the procedure. The VAS included a 10 cm linear scale on which 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'worst pain imaginable'. All patients will be asked to grade their perceived lower abdominal pain levels during specified stages of HSG using the VAS as explained to them. The scale will be used at different stages of the procedure: (1) before beginning the procedure; (2) after speculum application but before instrumentation; (3) after the application of the tenaculum and metal cannula and just before the injection of contrast medium; (4) at the end of uterine filling with contrast medium;

    Preprocedure and procedure time 0

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • patient's satisfaction with pain relief in the two groups using Likert scale

    Time Frame: 30 minutes post procedure and 24 hours post procedure

  • Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 30 minutes post procedure

    5 minutes and 30 minutes

  • Change in pain score from pre-procedure to 5 and 24 hours post procedure

    5 minutes and 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Intracervical lidocaine

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will comprise of patients that will receive the intracervical block. The study group will receive a total of 60 mg (6 mL) of 1% lidocaine to be injected at four points (12, 4, 6, and 8 o'clock) circumferentially into the cervix (1.5 mL at each point) 5 minutes before proceeding with the hysterosalpingogram.

Drug: Intracervical lidocaine

Intramuscular Diclofenac

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will comprise of patients that will receive intramuscular diclofenac potassium 75mg 30 minutes before proceeding with the hysterosalpingogram.

Drug: Intramuscular Diclofenac

Interventions

Intracervical lidocaine injected at four different points

Also known as: lignocaine
Intracervical lidocaine

Intramuscular Diclofenac 30 mins before HSG

Also known as: Diclofenac sodium, Voltaren
Intramuscular Diclofenac

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 49 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • All women with infertility who will be undergoing a hysterosalpingography, and must have given consent will be recruited into the study

You may not qualify if:

  • History of any allergies to local anaesthetics, radio-opaque dye, or anti-inflammatory medications
  • All patients with active pelvic inflammatory diseases
  • All patients with chronic pelvic pain
  • Patients with history of cervical surgery
  • Other indications for hysterosalpingography like Ashermans syndrome, congenital uterine anomalies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital

Kano, Kano State, Nigeria

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Hamilton M. Infertilty. In Edmonds K (Editor). Dewhurst's Textbook of obstetrics and gynecology. 8th edition. John Wiley and sons ltd 2012 567-79.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hacivelioglu S, Gencer M, Cakir Gungor A, Kosar S, Koc E, Cosar E. Can the addition of a paracervical block to systemic or local analgesics improve the pain perceived by the patient during hysterosalpingography? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jan;34(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.828025.

    PMID: 24359050BACKGROUND
  • Chauhan MB, Lakra P, Jyotsna D, Nanda S, Malhotra V. Pain relief during hysterosalpingography: role of intracervical block. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2515-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

    PMID: 22926800BACKGROUND
  • Robinson RD, Casablanca Y, Pagano KE, Arthur NA, Bates GW, Propst AM. Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):89-93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247645.52211.41.

    PMID: 17197592BACKGROUND
  • Ahmad G, Duffy J, Watson AJ. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD006106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006106.pub2.

    PMID: 17443612BACKGROUND
  • Sinnatamby CS editor. Last's Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 11th Edition. Edinburgh. Churchill Livingstone; 2006. P 311-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03362-9.

    PMID: 12414003BACKGROUND
  • Simpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study. Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):419-31. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055109.

    PMID: 16549607BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Interventions

LidocaineDiclofenac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesPhenylacetatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic Acids

Study Officials

  • Sulaiman D Muhammad, MBBS

    Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sulaiman D Muhammad, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2016

First Posted

September 29, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

February 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Locations