NCT02918526

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study will be to record the hemodynamic response measured by traditional methods (non-invasive blood pressure and ECG) and Pressure Recording Analytical Method in patients undergoing laryngeal mask placement compared with the hemodynamic response measured in patients undergoing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation for performing surgery in gynecological area and assess the differences with the two methods.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Laryngeal masks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cardiac Index (L/min/m2)

    Cardiac Index (L/min/m2) measured with Pulse Recording Analytic Method

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Heart rate (bpm)

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • Blood pressure (mmHg)

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • Cardiac Output (CO) (L/min)

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • Stroke Volume (SV) (ml/beat)

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • Stroke Volume Index (SVI) (ml/beat /m2)

    for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Laryngeal Mask

EXPERIMENTAL

laryngeal mask (LMA)

Device: airway management

Oro Tracheal Intubation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oro tracheal intubation

Device: airway management

Interventions

airway management with Laryngeal Mask or Oro Tracheal Intubation

Laryngeal MaskOro Tracheal Intubation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for elective gynecological surgery under general anesthesia
  • Age \>18 \<50 years
  • Presence of informed consent in the clinical record
  • Belonging to risk classes ASA 1 - ASA 2

You may not qualify if:

  • Hypertension
  • Heart failure
  • Treatment with beta blockers, Ca channel blockers, antihypertensives, vagolytic
  • Hypo/hyperthyroidism and its treatment
  • Adrenal insufficiency and its treatment
  • Autonomic neuropathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (11)

  • Efe EM, Bilgin BA, Alanoglu Z, Akbaba M, Denker C. Comparison of bolus and continuous infusion of esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

    PMID: 24998108BACKGROUND
  • Lee SY, Min JJ, Kim HJ, Hong DM, Kim HJ, Park HP. Hemodynamic effects of topical lidocaine on the laryngoscope blade and trachea during endotracheal intubation: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):668-75. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1812-z. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

    PMID: 24619576BACKGROUND
  • Daabiss M, Hashish M. Effects of lornoxicam on the hemodynamic and catecholamine response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):783-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1017-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

    PMID: 21369950BACKGROUND
  • Min JH, Chai HS, Kim YH, Chae YK, Choi SS, Lee A, Choi YS. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Mar;76(3):188-92.

    PMID: 20203546BACKGROUND
  • Sun HL, Wu TJ, Ng CC, Chien CC, Huang CC, Chie WC. Efficacy of oropharyngeal lidocaine instillation on hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.028.

    PMID: 19329013BACKGROUND
  • Perello-Cerda L, Fabregas N, Lopez AM, Rios J, Tercero J, Carrero E, Hurtado P, Hervias A, Gracia I, Caral L, de Riva N, Valero R. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Attenuates Systemic and Cerebral Hemodynamic Response During Awakening of Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000108.

    PMID: 25121397BACKGROUND
  • Agrawal G, Agarwal M, Taneja S. A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):326-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98325.

    PMID: 22869938BACKGROUND
  • Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1834-41. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00027.

    PMID: 12163802BACKGROUND
  • Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):159-65. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei154. Epub 2005 May 13.

    PMID: 15894561BACKGROUND
  • Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, Agro F, Amicucci G, Antonelli M, Azzeri F, Baroncini S, Bettelli G, Cafaggi C, Cattano D, Chinelli E, Corbanese U, Corso R, Della Puppa A, Di Filippo A, Facco E, Favaro R, Favero R, Frova G, Giunta F, Giurati G, Giusti F, Guarino A, Iannuzzi E, Ivani G, Mazzon D, Menarini M, Merli G, Mondello E, Muttini S, Nardi G, Pigna A, Pittoni G, Ripamonti D, Rosa G, Rosi R, Salvo I, Sarti A, Serafini G, Servadio G, Sgandurra A, Sorbello M, Tana F, Tufano R, Vesconi S, Villani A, Zauli M; Gruppo di Studio SIAARTI "Vie Aeree Difficili"; IRC e SARNePI; Task Force. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):617-57. No abstract available. English, Italian.

    PMID: 16278626BACKGROUND
  • Abdelgawad AF, Shi QF, Halawa MA, Wu ZL, Wu ZY, Chen XD, Yao SL. Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015 Jun;35(3):432-438. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1449-7. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

    PMID: 26072085BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Airway Management

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Alessandro Di Filippo, MD

    Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Alessandro Di Filippo, MD

CONTACT

Massimo Micaglio, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2016

First Posted

September 29, 2016

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share