Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device
Hemodynamic Study With Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device in Gynecological Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
94
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study will be to record the hemodynamic response measured by traditional methods (non-invasive blood pressure and ECG) and Pressure Recording Analytical Method in patients undergoing laryngeal mask placement compared with the hemodynamic response measured in patients undergoing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation for performing surgery in gynecological area and assess the differences with the two methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 29, 2016
September 1, 2016
5 months
September 24, 2016
September 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cardiac Index (L/min/m2)
Cardiac Index (L/min/m2) measured with Pulse Recording Analytic Method
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Heart rate (bpm)
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Blood pressure (mmHg)
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Cardiac Output (CO) (L/min)
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Stroke Volume (SV) (ml/beat)
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Stroke Volume Index (SVI) (ml/beat /m2)
for 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Laryngeal Mask
EXPERIMENTALlaryngeal mask (LMA)
Oro Tracheal Intubation
ACTIVE COMPARATORoro tracheal intubation
Interventions
airway management with Laryngeal Mask or Oro Tracheal Intubation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for elective gynecological surgery under general anesthesia
- Age \>18 \<50 years
- Presence of informed consent in the clinical record
- Belonging to risk classes ASA 1 - ASA 2
You may not qualify if:
- Hypertension
- Heart failure
- Treatment with beta blockers, Ca channel blockers, antihypertensives, vagolytic
- Hypo/hyperthyroidism and its treatment
- Adrenal insufficiency and its treatment
- Autonomic neuropathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
Efe EM, Bilgin BA, Alanoglu Z, Akbaba M, Denker C. Comparison of bolus and continuous infusion of esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation and sternotomy in coronary artery bypass graft. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PMID: 24998108BACKGROUNDLee SY, Min JJ, Kim HJ, Hong DM, Kim HJ, Park HP. Hemodynamic effects of topical lidocaine on the laryngoscope blade and trachea during endotracheal intubation: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):668-75. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1812-z. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
PMID: 24619576BACKGROUNDDaabiss M, Hashish M. Effects of lornoxicam on the hemodynamic and catecholamine response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):783-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1017-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
PMID: 21369950BACKGROUNDMin JH, Chai HS, Kim YH, Chae YK, Choi SS, Lee A, Choi YS. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Mar;76(3):188-92.
PMID: 20203546BACKGROUNDSun HL, Wu TJ, Ng CC, Chien CC, Huang CC, Chie WC. Efficacy of oropharyngeal lidocaine instillation on hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.028.
PMID: 19329013BACKGROUNDPerello-Cerda L, Fabregas N, Lopez AM, Rios J, Tercero J, Carrero E, Hurtado P, Hervias A, Gracia I, Caral L, de Riva N, Valero R. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Attenuates Systemic and Cerebral Hemodynamic Response During Awakening of Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000108.
PMID: 25121397BACKGROUNDAgrawal G, Agarwal M, Taneja S. A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):326-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98325.
PMID: 22869938BACKGROUNDRomano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1834-41. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00027.
PMID: 12163802BACKGROUNDScolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):159-65. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei154. Epub 2005 May 13.
PMID: 15894561BACKGROUNDPetrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, Agro F, Amicucci G, Antonelli M, Azzeri F, Baroncini S, Bettelli G, Cafaggi C, Cattano D, Chinelli E, Corbanese U, Corso R, Della Puppa A, Di Filippo A, Facco E, Favaro R, Favero R, Frova G, Giunta F, Giurati G, Giusti F, Guarino A, Iannuzzi E, Ivani G, Mazzon D, Menarini M, Merli G, Mondello E, Muttini S, Nardi G, Pigna A, Pittoni G, Ripamonti D, Rosa G, Rosi R, Salvo I, Sarti A, Serafini G, Servadio G, Sgandurra A, Sorbello M, Tana F, Tufano R, Vesconi S, Villani A, Zauli M; Gruppo di Studio SIAARTI "Vie Aeree Difficili"; IRC e SARNePI; Task Force. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):617-57. No abstract available. English, Italian.
PMID: 16278626BACKGROUNDAbdelgawad AF, Shi QF, Halawa MA, Wu ZL, Wu ZY, Chen XD, Yao SL. Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015 Jun;35(3):432-438. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1449-7. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
PMID: 26072085BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alessandro Di Filippo, MD
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2016
First Posted
September 29, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share