Optimising FSH Dosage During in Vitro Fertilization Fertilization (IVF)
Method for Determining Optimal FSH Dosage During in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
1 other identifier
interventional
196
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, women receive hormone stimulation with gonadotropins to induce growth of several ovarian follicles. Selecting the optimal dosage of gonadotropin is important to avoid maturation of too few or too many follicles, which may impair the chances of treatment success, lead to treatment cancellation, or serious side effects. Motivated by the lack of standardised procedures to estimate the optimal dosage of gonadotropins, a patient-specific test has been developed to predict the optimal hormone dosage. By measuring internalisation of gonadotropin by the patient's monocytes isolated form the peripheral blood ex vivo, the Gonadotropin Removal Test determines whether a patient needs increased or reduced hormon doses. In this clinical study the investigators compare deviation from optimal outcome at oocyte pick-up day in two patient groups. Optimal outcome of stimulation is defined as 10 oocytes collected in the group of patients matching the inclusion criteria of the study. The control group receives starting hormone dosage assigned by the clinician according to standard clinical procedures. The intervention group receives starting hormone dosage adjusted according to the results of the Gonadotropin Removal Test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 19, 2017
September 1, 2017
2.2 years
September 21, 2016
September 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Deviation from optimal ovarian response, defined as 10 oocytes collected during transvaginal follicle aspiration
Difference from optimal ovarian response (defined as 10 oocytes collected) is calculated for each patient. The mean these differences is compared between treatment and control groups.
The day of follicle aspiration.
Consistency of optimal ovarian response during stimulation.
Difference from optimal ovarian response (defined as 10 oocytes collected) is calculated for each patient. Variance of these differences is compared between treatment and control groups.
The day of follicle aspiration.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALHormone dosage is calculated by using the new method Gonadotropin removal test.
Routine IVF method
ACTIVE COMPARATORHormone dosage is chosen by the clinician according to standard clinical routine.
Interventions
Patient receives hormone dosage adjusted according to the results of the Gonadotropin removal test.
Patient receives hormone dosage according to the standard dosage regimen, without revealing the results of the Gonadotropin removal test to the clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stimulation according to the mid-luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol
- Pre-selected starting dose \<110 IU or \>270 IU FSH
You may not qualify if:
- Risk for hyperstimulation
- Polycystic ovary syndrome
- Endometriosis stage \>III
- BMI\>33
- Anti-mullerian hormone value missing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, Norway
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Fedorcsak, MD, PhD
OUS-HF
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2016
First Posted
September 27, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09