NCT02915887

Brief Summary

Objective: This study examined the effects of elastic tape applied to the neck on patients experiencing chronic neck pain. Background: Neck pain is often persistent or recurrent. Various treatments have been described, including exercises and manual therapy. Taping is commonly used clinically in the management of neck pain, however research in this field is sparse. Methods: Elastic tape was applied over the posterior cervical extensor muscles from insertion to origin on patients experiencing chronic neck pain. Patients were assessed pre-taping, immediately post-taping, and one week post-taping and did not receive additional physiotherapy during the study. Subjective measures included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to determine the level of disability in daily living, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) to assess fear of movement or re-injury. Objective outcome measures included cervical range of motion, velocity, smoothness, and accuracy of cervical motion. These kinematic measures were collected using a customised virtual reality system designed to evaluate neck motion disorders.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2016

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 18, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

neck painchronictapingkinematicsmotion analysisphysiotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Self-reported pain intensity was measured by theVisual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm)

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure neck pain intensity (0- 100mm).

    One week

  • Cervical range of motion was measured by the neck VR system (ROM, degrees)

    Cervical range of motion was measured to four directions- flexion, extension, right and left rotation, during the VR assessment.

    One week

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Cervical motion accuracy was measured by the VR system (Accuracy, degrees).

    one week

  • Self-reported disability was measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI, 0-100%)

    One week

  • Fear of movement was assessed using the TAMPA Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK, 0-68)

    One week

Study Arms (1)

cervical taping

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received treatment including elastic taping application to the neck. They were assessed 3 times: Pre taping, 20 minutes post-taping on day 1, and 7 days post-taping.

Other: Cervical Taping

Interventions

Kinesio®Tex Tape 23 was used in this study. Two strips of tape were applied. The first layer was a Y-shaped strip with 2 tails on 2 sides of the cervical vertebrae, placed over the posterior cervical extensor muscles and applied from the insertion to origin. The second strip was an I-shaped approximately 20cm long, transversally applied over the C5-C7 vertebra with a tension-on-base technique in a space correction technique.

cervical taping

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Chronic neck pain (\>3 months), with or without referral to the upper limb;
  • Age of 18 years or more;
  • Pain intensity ≥ 30% on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects were excluded if they had physiotherapy in the previous 2 months, known skin allergy to the tape, evidence for active vestibular disorders, medical conditions that may affect performance such as Rheumatic Arthritis, Diabetes Mellitus, neurological disorders, head injuries, lower limb pathologies, local or systemic infections, inability to communicate and provide informed consent, unstable fracture/dislocation, post-orthopaedic surgery in the upper body or spine, and pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences

Haifa, Haifa District, 3498838, Israel

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Macdonald, Taping techniques principles and practice. second edition ed. 2004: Elsevier limited.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez-Iglesias J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Huijbregts P, Del Rosario Gutierrez-Vega M. Short-term effects of cervical kinesio taping on pain and cervical range of motion in patients with acute whiplash injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Jul;39(7):515-21. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3072.

    PMID: 19574662BACKGROUND
  • Kalichman L, Vered E, Volchek L. Relieving symptoms of meralgia paresthetica using Kinesio taping: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):1137-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.013.

    PMID: 20537313BACKGROUND
  • Karatas N, Bicici S, Baltaci G, Caner H. The effect of Kinesiotape application on functional performance in surgeons who have musculo-skeletal pain after performing surgery. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(1):83-9. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.5377-11.1.

    PMID: 22274976BACKGROUND
  • Yoshida A, Kahanov L. The effect of kinesio taping on lower trunk range of motions. Res Sports Med. 2007 Apr-Jun;15(2):103-12. doi: 10.1080/15438620701405206.

    PMID: 17578750BACKGROUND
  • Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesio taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med. 2004 Mar 1;3(1):1-7. eCollection 2004 Mar.

    PMID: 24497814BACKGROUND
  • Saavedra-Hernandez M, Castro-Sanchez AM, Arroyo-Morales M, Cleland JA, Lara-Palomo IC, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Short-term effects of kinesio taping versus cervical thrust manipulation in patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;42(8):724-30. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4086. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

    PMID: 22523090BACKGROUND
  • Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007.

    PMID: 21112430BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainChronic PainBronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsOrganizing PneumoniaBronchiolitis ObliteransBronchiolitisBronchitisBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesGraft vs Host DiseaseImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hilla Sarig Bahat, PT, PhD

    Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2016

First Posted

September 27, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2015

Study Completion

June 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations