Obesity: Cesarean Health by Incision Placement
O-CHIP
1 other identifier
interventional
284
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: A Pfannenstiel cesarean skin incision placed under the pannus (should a pannus exist) will have a higher maternal morbidity composite rate than a Cohen cesarean skin incision placed above the pannus (should a pannus exist).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 10, 2018
July 1, 2018
3 years
September 16, 2016
July 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Maternal Morbidity
To compare composite maternal morbidity (wound complications within 6 weeks including cellulitis, wound abscess, wound separation or dehiscence, hematoma, seroma formation, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage), by placement type of transverse Cesarean skin incision in individuals with BMI \>35 kg/m2.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Composite maternal morbidity (as above) by stage of pannus
18 months
Composite wound complication rates (cellulitis, wound abscess, wound separation or dehiscence, hematoma, seroma)
18 months
Length in minutes of operative time from time of skin incision to time of delivery of the neonate
18 months
Length in minutes of total operating time (from time of skin incision to the completion of closure of the skin incision)
18 months
Patient satisfaction (via two questions, Likert scale)
18 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pfannenstiel Incision
NO INTERVENTIONThis curved incision is approximately 10-15 cm long and 2 cm above the pubic symphysis. If a pannus is present, the pannus should be retracted up (see diagram) to allow placement of the Pfannenstiel incision.
Cohen Incision
EXPERIMENTALThis is a straight transverse incision through the skin, 3 cm below the level of the anterior superior iliac spines (higher than the Pfannenstiel incision). Should a pannus exist, the pannus should be left in the physiologic location (not retracted) to allow placement of the incision.
Interventions
This is a straight transverse incision through the skin, 3 cm below the level of the anterior superior iliac spines (higher than the Pfannenstiel incision). Should a pannus exist, the pannus should be left in the physiologic location (not retracted) to allow placement of the incision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI \> or = 35 kg/m2 at time of presentation for delivery
- Speaks English
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \< 35 kg/m2 at time of presentation or delivery
- Unable to consent (including language spoken other than English)
- Prior abdominal incisions or obstetric factors necessitating placement of incision in specified location, at the discretion of the attending surgeon
- Infection present (ie cellulitis) precluding incision placement at one of the randomization sites
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Related Publications (7)
Hofmeyr JG, Novikova N, Mathai M, Shah A. Techniques for cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):431-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.018.
PMID: 19879392BACKGROUNDChu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, Curtis KM. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007 Sep;8(5):385-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00397.x.
PMID: 17716296BACKGROUNDAyres-de-Campos D. Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: prevention and management of wound complications. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;29(3):406-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25457856BACKGROUNDHouston MC, Raynor BD. Postoperative morbidity in the morbidly obese parturient woman: supraumbilical and low transverse abdominal approaches. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1033-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105400.
PMID: 10819819BACKGROUNDWall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):952-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00861-5.
PMID: 14672469BACKGROUNDAlanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):271.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.049. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
PMID: 20678746BACKGROUNDMarrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. REMOVED: The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;210(4):319. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
PMID: 24560557BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Obstetrician/Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2016
First Posted
September 21, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share