Surgicel Snow in Gynecological Surgery

NCT02908841 | Completed Results

• 1 other identifier: 16-02-37-337
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 43
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 3

Brief Summary

Surgicel Snow is an FDA approved topical hemostatic agent for use during surgical procedures. Like the other mechanical agents, Surgicel Snow forms a physical barrier that blocks blood flow while providing a large surface area for the rapid formation of a fibrin clot. As a mechanical agent derived from oxidized regenerated cellulose, Surgicel Snow shares with other mechanical hemostatic agents, the benefits of a favorable risk profile. This study would examine the efficacy of Surgicel Snow vs. direct compression in the control of capillary, venous, and small arterial hemorrhage when ligation or other conventional methods of control are impractical or ineffective in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The intraoperative inclusion bleeding characteristics are minimal and mild retroperitoneal bleeding and moderate retroperitoneal bleeding that has been adequately reduced by standard surgical methods. 60 patients will be recruited for this study, all of which will be scheduled for hysterectomy at Western Connecticut Health Network (Norwalk Hospital and Danbury Hospital) under the direction of Dr. Thomas Rutherford, Dr. John Garofalo, and Dr. Robert Samuelson. The investigators will randomize 30 patients to the treatment group and 30 patients to the control group. Participants may continue all regular medications before and during the study. The consent process will be incorporated into the last pre-operative office visit. The health risks associated with use of Surgicel Snow may be less, the same or more than direct pressure alone. Surgicel Snow is generally used for minimal to mild bleeding from specific or widespread area; however, its effectiveness compared to direct pressure is unknown for a hysterectomy surgery.

Conditions

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Change in Bleeding at Specified Time Intervals

  Because multiple factors other than retroperitoneal bleeding contribute to the total intraoperative bleed loss, the investigators believe that the intraoperative estimated blood loss is not a pure indicator of the efficacy of a topical hemostatic agent for control of retroperitoneal bleeding. Data from the specified time points (4 minutes, 7 minutes and 10 minutes) was combined to calculate an average bleeding event time for each subject.

  4 minutes, 7 minutes and 10 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (5)

• Total Intraoperative Time

  up to 4 hours

• Rate of Intraoperative Blood Loss

  up to 4 hours

• Blood Transfusion

  up to 4 hours

• Total Postoperative Symptomatic Fluid Collection

  through study completion, an average of 6 weeks

• Number of Participants With Postoperative Pelvic Abscess

  through study completion, an average of 6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Control

OTHER

30 patients randomized to the control group and will receive standard of care. Control patients will be managed with direct compression with gauze pads or laparotomy pads for four minutes. If hemostasis is not achieved by compression after four minutes, the source and rate of bleeding will be reevaluated and management will be determined by the surgeon. If the surgeon uses SurgicelSnow to achieve hemostasis at some point after 4 minutes, the patient will be included in the control group, but the data will be and flagged for the analysis. If failure of hemostasis at 4 minutes with an estimated loss of ≥25 cc/min, patient will be managed as per judgment of surgeon. Persistent bleeding at the 10 minute observation point will be treated as per the surgeon's judgment.

Other: Standard of Care

Treatment

OTHER

30 patients randomized to the treatment group will receive Surgicel Snow. For patients with qualifying bleeding (rated on initial evaluation as at least "mild") who have been randomized to receive Surgicel Snow, a single thin layer of dry Surgicel Snow will be applied over the area of bleeding and positioned firmly in direct contact to the areas of bleeding with blunt surgical instruments. Surgicel Snow will be left in the cavity to be absorbed. Dry gauze will not be placed over the material. No adjuncts will be added to the enhance hemostasis, but patients with small arteriolar bleeding will have pressure maintained on the bleeding site for 60 seconds. Hemostatic failure at 4 minutes will be reassessed for rate of blood loss and if the rate of loss is estimated at less than 25 cc per minute, additional observations will be made at 7 and 10 minutes.

Device: Surgicel Snow

Interventions

Surgicel Snow DEVICE

Treatment

Standard of Care OTHER

Control

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Women ≥18 years of age
• Women scheduled for standard multiport laparoscopic, single site laparoscopic, and robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
• Sites of surgery include Norwalk Hospital and Danbury Hospital.
• Indication for surgery includes benign, complex benign, and malignant conditions.
• Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

• Vaginal hysterectomy or open abdominal hysterectomy;
• Hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy.
• Ovarian cancer

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Danbury Hospital: lead
• Ethicon, Inc.: collaborator

Study Sites (3)

Danbury Hospital

Danbury, Connecticut, 06810, United States

Location

Physicians for Women's Health

Norwalk, Connecticut, 06850, United States

Location

Norwalk Hospital

Norwalk, Connecticut, 06856, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

• Spangler D, Rothenburger S, Nguyen K, Jampani H, Weiss S, Bhende S. In vitro antimicrobial activity of oxidized regenerated cellulose against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003 Fall;4(3):255-62. doi: 10.1089/109629603322419599.

  PMID: 14588160 BACKGROUND

• Martyn D, Kocharian R, Lim S, Meckley LM, Miyasato G, Prifti K, Rao Y, Riebman JB, Scaife JG, Soneji Y, Corral M. Reduction in hospital costs and resource consumption associated with the use of advanced topical hemostats during inpatient procedures. J Med Econ. 2015 Jun;18(6):474-81. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1017503. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

  PMID: 25728820 BACKGROUND

• Ata B, Turkgeldi E, Seyhan A, Urman B. Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision; comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.168. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

  PMID: 25573183 BACKGROUND

• Santulli P, Marcellin L, Touboul C, Ballester M, Darai E, Rouzier R. Experience with TachoSil in obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 May;113(2):112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

  PMID: 21453918 BACKGROUND

• Angioli R, Muzii L, Montera R, Damiani P, Bellati F, Plotti F, Zullo MA, Oronzi I, Terranova C, Panici PB. Feasibility of the use of novel matrix hemostatic sealant (FloSeal) to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic excision of endometrioma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

  PMID: 19138574 BACKGROUND

• Ribeiro SC, Reich H, Rosenberg J, Guglielminetti E, Vidali A. Laparoscopic myomectomy and pregnancy outcome in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 1999 Mar;71(3):571-4. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00483-x.

  PMID: 10065802 BACKGROUND

• Raga F, Sanz-Cortes M, Bonilla F, Casan EM, Bonilla-Musoles F. Reducing blood loss at myomectomy with use of a gelatin-thrombin matrix hemostatic sealant. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.038. Epub 2009 May 6.

  PMID: 19423098 BACKGROUND

• Angioli R, Plotti F, Ricciardi R, Terranova C, Zullo MA, Damiani P, Montera R, Guzzo F, Scaletta G, Muzii L. The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):2046-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2154-2. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

  PMID: 22302534 BACKGROUND

• Shander A, Kaplan LJ, Harris MT, Gross I, Nagarsheth NP, Nemeth J, Ozawa S, Riley JB, Ashton M, Ferraris VA. Topical hemostatic therapy in surgery: bridging the knowledge and practice gap. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):570-9.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.061. Epub 2014 Jun 2. No abstract available.

  PMID: 25151345 BACKGROUND

• Wysham WZ, Roque DR, Soper JT. Use of topical hemostatic agents in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Sep;69(9):557-63. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000106.

  PMID: 25229825 BACKGROUND

• Parker WH, Wagner WH. Gynecologic surgery and the management of hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;37(3):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2010.05.003.

  PMID: 20674784 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Standard of Care

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health Care; Quality of Health Care; Health Services Administration; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Joann Petrini
• Organization: Western Connecticut Health Network

Joann.Petrini@wchn.org

203-739-6882

Study Officials

• Joann Petrini, PhD

  Nuvance Health

  STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: Yes
• Restrictive Agreement: No

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Director, Clinical Outcomes and Health Services Research

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 7, 2016
• First Posted: September 21, 2016
• Study Start: July 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: September 1, 2018
• Study Completion: February 11, 2019
• Last Updated: July 14, 2021
• Results First Posted: December 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (3)