NCT02908412

Brief Summary

The decision to transfuse or not to transfuse blood products is one of the main issues in patients undergoing surgery. The standard laboratory method of hemoglobin assessment is time-consuming, gives intermittent data, and requires venipuncture which is invasive and painful. In the past decade, the use of non-invasive and faster methods, which allow physicians to measure hemoglobin levels at the patient's bedside, have become widespread. One of the tools that make this possible is Spectrophotometric Hemoglobin. However, one of the main concerns regarding this method is its accuracy. Since the accuracy of this assessment depends on the extent of perfusion of the organ on which the probe is placed, use of digital nerve blocks proposed to increase its accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the effects of digital nerve block (with bupivacaine) on the accuracy of non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 4, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

September 15, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Nerve BlockSpectrophotometryBupivacaineSpinal SurgeryBlood Loss, Surgical

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • accuracy of SpHb

    in each patient, Sphb values will be documented for both hands. Also, the arterial blood sample (lab Hb) will be sent to the laboratory. The difference between two measure in each hand (with or without DNB) shows the accuracy of Sphb for each hand.

    At the start of the operation, once every 1.5 hours during the operation till its end

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Perfusion index (PI)

    At the start of the operation, once every 1.5 hours during the operation till its end

  • Pleth Variability Index (PVI)

    At the start of the operation, once every 1.5 hours during the operation till its end

Study Arms (2)

Digital nerve block in left hand

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this group will receive DNB in left hand. DNB will be performed by injecting 2 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the base of medial and lateral sides of the finger attached to the sensor (1 ml on each side of the base).

Drug: Digital nerve block with bupivacaine

Digital nerve block in right hand

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this group will receive DNB in right hand. DNB will be performed by injecting 2 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the base of medial and lateral sides of the finger attached to the sensor (1 ml on each side of the base).

Drug: Digital nerve block with bupivacaine

Interventions

The aim of the study, the way it will be conducted, and the complications and possible risks are explained to them. written informed consent is obtained from them. Then, after induction of anaesthesia, an arterial line will be inserted in order to monitor blood pressure and to take blood samples. During the surgery, two rainbow adult ReSposable sensors will be attached to the third or fourth fingers of both hands, and each of sensors will be attached to a monitor. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: group A will receive DNB in left hand and group B will receive DNB in right hand. DNB will be performed by injecting 2 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the base of medial and lateral sides of the finger attached to the sensor (1 ml on each side of the base).

Digital nerve block in left handDigital nerve block in right hand

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sina Hospital

Tehran, Tehtan, Iran

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Barker SJ, Shander A, Ramsay MA. Continuous Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring: A Measured Response to a Critical Review. Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):565-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000605.

    PMID: 25746056BACKGROUND
  • Lamhaut L, Apriotesei R, Combes X, Lejay M, Carli P, Vivien B. Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue(R) with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):548-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182270c22.

    PMID: 21716091BACKGROUND
  • Suehiro K, Joosten A, Alexander B, Cannesson M. Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: ready for prime time? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Jun;21(3):265-70. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000197.

    PMID: 25827587BACKGROUND
  • Kim SH, Lilot M, Murphy LS, Sidhu KS, Yu Z, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Accuracy of continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):332-346. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000272.

    PMID: 24914627BACKGROUND
  • Applegate RL 2nd, Barr SJ, Collier CE, Rook JL, Mangus DB, Allard MW. Evaluation of pulse cooximetry in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):65-72. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d774f.

    PMID: 22133758BACKGROUND
  • Rice MJ, Gravenstein N, Morey TE. Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: how accurate is enough? Anesth Analg. 2013 Oct;117(4):902-907. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829483fb. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

    PMID: 23842195BACKGROUND
  • Giraud B, Frasca D, Debaene B, Mimoz O. Comparison of haemoglobin measurement methods in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):946-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet252. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

    PMID: 23869108BACKGROUND
  • Park YH, Lee JH, Song HG, Byon HJ, Kim HS, Kim JT. The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring using the radical-7 pulse CO-Oximeter in children undergoing neurosurgery. Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1302-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826b7e38. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

    PMID: 23144437BACKGROUND
  • Miller RD, Ward TA, Shiboski SC, Cohen NH. A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):858-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820eecd1. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

    PMID: 21385985BACKGROUND
  • Miller RD, Ward TA, McCulloch CE, Cohen NH. Does a digital regional nerve block improve the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring? J Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1452-0. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

    PMID: 22850903BACKGROUND
  • Miller RD, Ward TA, McCulloch CE, Cohen NH. A comparison of lidocaine and bupivacaine digital nerve blocks on noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring in a randomized trial in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2014 Apr;118(4):766-71. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000144.

    PMID: 24651230BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Blood Loss, Surgical

Interventions

Bupivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsIntraoperative Complications

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2016

First Posted

September 21, 2016

Study Start

January 4, 2017

Primary Completion

October 1, 2017

Study Completion

January 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-12

Locations