Multi-channel Stimulation for Post Stroke Spasticity (MUSTS)
MUSTS
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Over 87,000 people have a first stroke in the UK each year; about 70% of victims have altered arm function and about 40% are left with a non-functional arm. Spasticity is a significant deterrent for recovery of arm function following stroke. One in four patients develop spasticity within the first 2 weeks of the stroke and by 12 months 39 % have spasticity. The use of oral antispasticity medications like baclofen and tizanidine are often restricted due to side effects like sedation, weakness and floppiness. Compliance of adults to treatment with oral anti spasticity drugs is only around 50%. There are a few exploratory studies on sensory stimulation using Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in reducing spasticity. Amatya et al reviewed the evidence and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to recommend its routine use. One possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of TENS is that it uses a single channel, single strength and fixed duration stimulation to which the nervous system may get habituated. We have developed Shefstim; a unique miniaturised 64 channel electrical stimulator. Using Shefstim we pioneered a technique called Sensory Barrage Stimulation ;rapid simultaneous stimulation at multiple sites, in a constantly changing pattern. We hypothesise that this approach will significantly reduce habituation compared to single site stimulation, thus providing a better treatment for spasticity. Objective of the proposed study is to to explore the feasibility of conducting a community based randomised cross over trial comparing SBS with TENS for post stroke upper limb the spasticity of elbow flexors to optimise the stimulation parameters through quantifying objectively the muscular response to two different stimulation protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedJuly 18, 2019
July 1, 2019
2 years
September 13, 2016
July 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
upper limb function after four weeks of intervention measured by the Action Research Arm Test
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
muscle activity as measured using EMG
4 weeks
measures of muscle tone
4 weeks
strength
4 weeks
impact of spasticity
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulus
ACTIVE COMPARATORResearcher 1 who is blind to patients' allocation group will perform the baseline assessments. The researcher 2 will determine the maximum tolerable level of stimulation. The researcher 2 will demonstrate to the participant how to apply the stimulation and will instruct the participant. The participant will revive the first intervention in the Royal Hallamshire Hospital under supervision of researcher 2. The researcher 2 will then issue the participants in Group-2 (SBS) with Shefstim and six multichannel electrodes. They will instruct each participant to change the electrode once every 3 days. On the 15th day the researcher 2 will visit them at home and issue further 6 multichannel electrodes and collect back the previous set. At the end of week 4, the patient will come to Hospital.
Sensory Barrage Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORResearcher 1 who is blind to patients' allocation group will perform the baseline assessments. The researcher 2 will determine the maximum tolerable level of stimulation. The researcher 2 will demonstrate to the participant how to apply the stimulation and will instruct the participant. The participant will revive the first intervention in the Royal Hallamshire Hospital under supervision of researcher 2. The researcher 2 will then issue the participants in Group-2 (SBS) with Shefstim and six multichannel electrodes. They will instruct each participant to change the electrode once every 3 days. On the 15th day the researcher 2 will visit them at home and issue further 6 multichannel electrodes and collect back the previous set. At the end of week 4, the patient will come to Hospital.
Interventions
Electrode arrays will be worn over the affected arm with stimulation applied over the extensor aspect of the upper arm
electrodes placed over the radial nerve in radial grove
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 and above;
- Six months after stroke;
- Spasticity at elbow of grade-2 or more on the modified Ashworth scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment that would interfere with their ability to comply with the experimental protocol or provide informed consent;
- Dermatological, rheumatologic or orthopaedic illnesses of the affected arm interfering with movement of the elbow;
- Pre-existing severe systemic disorders like cardiovascular disease; active cancer or renal disease; end stage pulmonary or cardiovascular disease; psychiatric illness including severe alcohol or drug abuse and depression;
- Inability to perform the baseline assessments;
- Severe tactile hypersensitivity;
- Participation in other, spasticity related studies;
- Within 12 weeks of receiving Botulinum toxin injections;
- Uncontrolled epilepsy;
- Pace maker or any other implanted devices;
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Sheffield, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Siva Nair
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2016
First Posted
September 20, 2016
Study Start
September 30, 2016
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
July 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share