Misoprostol for Labour Induction
The Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Compared With Oral Misoprostol for Labour Induction in Term Pregnancies: a Pair-matched Case-control Study
1 other identifier
observational
138
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) with an off-label use of oral misoprostol (OM). Design: Pair-matched case-control study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic centre in Germany. Population: A cohort of 138 women ≥ 37/0 weeks pregnant undergoing labour induction. Methods: The induction of labour with a retrievable prostaglandin vaginal insert in a consecutive series of 69 women was compared with induction using oral misoprostol in a pair-matched cohort. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the time from induction to delivery and the caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes included uterine tachysystole, tocolysis, fetal scalp blood testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical arterial pH, and Apgar score.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedSeptember 16, 2016
September 1, 2016
1 month
August 3, 2016
September 13, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time from application of the medication until delivery in minutes
September 2015
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rate of participants receiving a caesarean section compared to all participants being induced
September 2015
Number of participants with treatment-related tachysystole as assessed by cardiotocography
September 2015
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events following tocolysis with Partusisten
September 2015
Number of participants with fetal compromise assessed by the APGAR-Score and the postpartum fetal pH-value
September 2015
Study Arms (2)
Misprostol vaginal insert for labour induction
69 patients matching the inclusion criteria and received MVI for labour induction
Oral misoprostol for labour induction
69 patients matching the inclusion criteria and received OM for labour induction
Eligibility Criteria
A cohort of 138 women ≥ 37/0 weeks pregnant undergoing labour induction.
You may qualify if:
- gynaecologist's indication for induction
- informed consent
- \> 37 weeks of gestation
- singleton pregnancies
- cephalic presentation
- cervical Bishop score of \< 5 before priming reassuring fetal heart rate
You may not qualify if:
- known hypersensitivity to prostaglandins
- uterine scar
- parity \> 5
- any contraindication for vaginal delivery
- cephalopelvic disproportion
- placenta previa
- chorioamnionitis
- antepartum bleeding of unknown aetiology
- cardiopulmonary, renal, hepatic maternal disease glaucoma
- fetal congenital abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2016
First Posted
September 16, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share