Impact of Different Restorative Treatments for Deep Caries Lesion in Primary Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In front of a lack of evidence to determine the best treatment for deep cavitated carious lesions, the search for an effective restorative technique, which results in a least possible discomfort to patients, and reduce the time needed for the restorative treatment, if becomes relevant. The objective of this randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of high viscosity glass ionomer cement restorations (HVGIC) compared to restoration with calcium hydroxide restoration associated with high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC) for treatment of deep lesions in primary molars, as well as the impact of treatment in the criteria focused on the patient as well as cost-efficacy of the techniques . Children with 4 to 8 years will be selected randomly at the Clinic for Children at the University Ibirapuera of Dentistry. 108 teeth will be randomized into two groups: (1) restoration with calcium hydroxide cement associated with HVGIC and (2) HVGIC restoration. The restorations will be evaluated after 6, 12 and 24 months by two trained examiners blinded to the treatments. The efficacy of each treatment is measured by four main outcomes, which are: (1) criteria related to the effectiveness of the restorative treatment (2) criteria focused on the patient and (3) cost-efficacy. For comparison between the two groups will be used the Kaplan-Meier survival and the long-rank test. Cox regression is performed the assessment of the influence of some other variable results. For all analyzes, the significance level is set at 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.3 years
September 6, 2016
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pulp Vitality
To evaluate the survival of different restorative treatments considering the pulp vitality.
Up to 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Wong-Baker scale to discomfort
Immediately to restoration procedure.
Cost-efficacy analysis by total value of treatment in relation to efficacy
Up to 24 months
Restoration longevity
Up to 24 months.
Caries progression
Up to 24 months.
Study Arms (2)
HVGIC
EXPERIMENTALRestorations with only HVGIC in deep caries lesion of primary teeth.
Indirect pulp capping
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndirect pulp capping with calcium hydroxide cement, restored with HVGIC:
Interventions
In experimental group, the researches will be performed a restoration, after partial caries removal, with high viscosity glass ionomer cement in the teeth with deep caries lesion.
In control group, the researches will be performed a indirect pulp capping with calcium hydroxide cement and high viscosity glass ionomer cement in the teeth with deep caries lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children will be included that have at least one primary molar with deep cavitated carious lesions in occlusal surface.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded with special needs, using orthodontics devices and / or systemic diseases which may affect the oral cavity. Also, teeth with pulp exposure, spontaneous pain, mobility, presence of abscess or fistula next to the tooth, teeth with restorations, sealants or enamel formation defects will also be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidade Ibirapuera
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04661-100, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
da Silva GSQ, Raggio DP, Machado GFR, Mello-Moura ACV, Gimenez T, Floriano I, Tedesco TK. Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0703-3.
PMID: 30621659DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD in Pediatric Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2016
First Posted
September 16, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06