Comparison Between End-to-side and Side-to-side Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy
A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between End-to-side and Side-to-side Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy compared with that of side-to-side anastomosis. The investigators hypothesize that the end-to-side anastomosis may be associated with superior recovery compared with side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under enhanced recovery program. The primary endpoint is the cumulative recovery rate, consisting of the recovery time of diet, pain, ambulation, and afebrile status.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 5, 2025
CompletedMarch 5, 2025
February 1, 2025
2.9 years
September 2, 2016
December 2, 2024
February 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative Recovery Rate
The cumulative recovery rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are satisfied with all aspects of recovery time. Recovery time includes the following: 1. Tolerance of diet for 24hours 2. Analgesic-free status (oral or intravenous (IV) analgesic drugs not necessary after cessation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)), 3. Safe ambulation (ambulation of 600m without assistance), 4. Afebrile status without major complications (fever was defined as body temperature greater than 37.2°C at axilla).
at 7 days after operation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Hospital Stay
at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week
Postoperative Complications
at 30 days
Failure Rate of the Enhanced Recovery Program
at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week
Readmission Rate Within 1 Month After Surgery
at 30 days
Study Arms (2)
ES anastomosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORStapled end-to-side anastomosis
SS anastomosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORStapled side-to-side anastomosis
Interventions
The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the end of the distal ileum with one circular stapler, and the blind end of the transverse colon will be closed with one linear stapler.
The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the side wall of the distal ileum with two linear staplers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18 - 80
- Right-sided colon cancer (adenocarcinoma, located in cecum to hepatic flexure)
- Appropriate laboratory (Bone marrow) findings (Hemoglobin ≥ 10g/dl, White blood cell count ≥ 4,000/mm3, Platelet ≥ 100,000/mm3)
- Appropriate renal function (Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl)
- Appropriate cardio-pulmonary functions
- Appropriate understanding of the study and provide the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Distant metastasis or locally advanced tumor which required combined resection of other organs, such as the ureter, duodenum, or small bowel.
- Not suitable for laparoscopic surgery
- Currently taking medication for dyschezia, such as constipation or diarrhea.
- Not suitable for adapting enhanced recovery program due to underlying diseases, such as cardio-pulmonary disease, mental disorder, and etc.
- Not suitable for participation in this clinical trial based on the judgment of the investigators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Seoul National Univercity Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, Gyeonggido, 463-707, South Korea
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea
Limitations and Caveats
Second, our ERAS protocol did not include recent developments such as preoperative carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia, and routine administration of drugs for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sung-Bum Kang, MD, PhD
- Organization
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sung-Bum Kang, M.D, Ph.D.
Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2016
First Posted
September 13, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 5, 2025
Results First Posted
March 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share