NCT02897531

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy compared with that of side-to-side anastomosis. The investigators hypothesize that the end-to-side anastomosis may be associated with superior recovery compared with side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under enhanced recovery program. The primary endpoint is the cumulative recovery rate, consisting of the recovery time of diet, pain, ambulation, and afebrile status.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
130

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2016

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2016

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2020

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

September 2, 2016

Results QC Date

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Ileocolic, stapled, laparoscopy, right hemicolectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cumulative Recovery Rate

    The cumulative recovery rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are satisfied with all aspects of recovery time. Recovery time includes the following: 1. Tolerance of diet for 24hours 2. Analgesic-free status (oral or intravenous (IV) analgesic drugs not necessary after cessation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)), 3. Safe ambulation (ambulation of 600m without assistance), 4. Afebrile status without major complications (fever was defined as body temperature greater than 37.2°C at axilla).

    at 7 days after operation

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Postoperative Hospital Stay

    at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week

  • Postoperative Complications

    at 30 days

  • Failure Rate of the Enhanced Recovery Program

    at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week

  • Readmission Rate Within 1 Month After Surgery

    at 30 days

Study Arms (2)

ES anastomosis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stapled end-to-side anastomosis

Procedure: ES anastomosis

SS anastomosis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stapled side-to-side anastomosis

Procedure: SS anastomosis

Interventions

The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the end of the distal ileum with one circular stapler, and the blind end of the transverse colon will be closed with one linear stapler.

ES anastomosis

The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the side wall of the distal ileum with two linear staplers.

SS anastomosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 18 - 80
  • Right-sided colon cancer (adenocarcinoma, located in cecum to hepatic flexure)
  • Appropriate laboratory (Bone marrow) findings (Hemoglobin ≥ 10g/dl, White blood cell count ≥ 4,000/mm3, Platelet ≥ 100,000/mm3)
  • Appropriate renal function (Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl)
  • Appropriate cardio-pulmonary functions
  • Appropriate understanding of the study and provide the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Distant metastasis or locally advanced tumor which required combined resection of other organs, such as the ureter, duodenum, or small bowel.
  • Not suitable for laparoscopic surgery
  • Currently taking medication for dyschezia, such as constipation or diarrhea.
  • Not suitable for adapting enhanced recovery program due to underlying diseases, such as cardio-pulmonary disease, mental disorder, and etc.
  • Not suitable for participation in this clinical trial based on the judgment of the investigators

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Seoul National Univercity Bundang Hospital

Seongnam, Gyeonggido, 463-707, South Korea

Location

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Second, our ERAS protocol did not include recent developments such as preoperative carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia, and routine administration of drugs for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sung-Bum Kang, MD, PhD
Organization
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Officials

  • Sung-Bum Kang, M.D, Ph.D.

    Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2016

First Posted

September 13, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Results First Posted

March 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations