Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure
ILEOMESH
Multicentric, Prospective, Randomized and Simple Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of the Placement of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure in Patients With a Prior Rectal Resection for Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
157
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to determine the efficacy of the placement of an onlay mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop ileostomy closure in patients with a prior rectal resection for cancer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 12, 2016
September 1, 2016
1 year
April 16, 2016
September 9, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of incisional hernia
The primary endpoint is the incidence of incisional hernia, either symptomatic or asymptomatic in the mesh and suture-only groups. Because appearance of an incisional hernia occurs within the first months after laparotomy, assessment of efficacy was carried out during scheduled clinical visits over a period of 12 months. The presence of incisional hernia was evaluated by physical examination at scheduled clinical visits and radiologically by an abdominal CT scan performed at the end of follow-up (6 months after operation).
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perioperative complications
30 days
Quality of life of the patients
3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORAbdominal wall closure will be done by continuous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1, and the skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure
Reinforcement with Mesh
EXPERIMENTALAbdominal wall closure will be done by continous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1. The incision is reinforced with onlay placement of a light polypropylene mesh (3 cm wide and the length corresponding to the incision), fixed to the aponeurosis with interrupted polyglactin (Vycril) suture. The skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure
Interventions
At the end of the follow up (12 Months) a CT scan will be done. Radiologically the incisional hernia is defined as a solution of continuity of the abdominal wall seen on the abdominal CT scan with the patient at rest. The radiologist is blinded to the patient's history and the technique used for fascial closure.
The presence of incisional hernia was evaluated by physical examination at scheduled clinical visits (3 and 6 months after surgery) Clinically, an incisional hernia is defined as the presence of a reducible bulge or protrusion at the laparotomy incision scar, palpable during the Valsalva maneuver.
Reinforcement with Light Polypropylene Mesh
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients operated on in hospitals in Catalunya for loop ileostomy closure after a prior rectal resection for rectal cancer.
- elective surgery for loop ileostomy closure
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)\<4
You may not qualify if:
- allergy or intolerance to polypropilene
- patients with a prior mesh on the abdominal wall
- ASA ≥IV
- patients with a life expectancy of \<12 months
- chronic renal failure in haemodialysis
- patients on steroid therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Aleidis Caro
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2016
First Posted
September 12, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share