Securing and Optimizing the Patient's Drug Therapy With Cancer: Clinical Pharmacy and Articulation With the City
PRIMAC
1 other identifier
observational
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The path of a patient depends largely on his health care network, that is to say of the interrelationships between health professionals who will be involved throughout his career. At the hospital, the transition points in the care process is a vulnerable time for the patient regarding the continuity of his medication. These transition points are the intake, the transfer and the outlet. In town, our health system must be able to build on the inter-city hospital, warranty essential guarantee of the continuity of care. However, there is often a breakdown in this relationship with more or less serious consequences ranging from simple dissatisfaction of the patient, to the realization of duplicate examinations or the use unjustified emergency and re-hospitalization. Medication errors can occur, resulting from incomplete information or poorly communicated in this city hospital interface. The city hospital dysfunctions are mainly organizational, hospital being rather specialized therapeutic approach centered on pathology and medicine city instead focuses on a patient's overall approach. The involvement of the pharmacist in the hospital, as the city is an interesting axis to develop. In town, the pharmaceutical nomadism, including in major cities remains low, patients generally have a dedicated pharmacies for the treatment of their serious or chronic pathologies. The development of the pharmaceutical folder today allows the pharmacies to access the history and the entire therapy of patients prescribed to town by different specialists and general practitioners, on the last 4 months. Its recent availability within our hospital Group allows us to consider its use to fully optimize the patient's drug monitoring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2016
CompletedJune 1, 2018
September 1, 2016
2 months
August 31, 2016
May 30, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of change of the Number of pharmaceutical consultations
Day 0, Day 3, day 30
Assessment of change of the Number of patients discharged
Day 0, Day 3, day 30
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted in oncology unit at Paris Saint joseph Hospital
You may qualify if:
- Patient accepting to be roll on
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2016
First Posted
September 12, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2016-09