NCT02895295

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine whether providing Medicare beneficiaries with a web-based patient-centered decision tool to help them choose among prescription medication coverage plans improves outcomes for patients including a greater likelihood of changing a plan, better coverage for prescribed drugs, less decisional conflict when choosing plans, and greater satisfaction with the choice process relative to current practice.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,185

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 6, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2016

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 20, 2017

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 23, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 6, 2016

Results QC Date

January 31, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Medicare Part Ddecision supportprescription drugsexpert recommendationhealth insurance choice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Count of Participants Whose 2017 Plan Differed From Their 2016 Plan

    Indicator of whether the self-reported plan of the participant differed before and after open enrollment and the participant reported that s/he changed plans during open enrollment.

    within 50 days of the end of the open enrollment period.

  • Decisional Conflict

    Low literacy decisional conflict scale (Linder et al., 2011), edited slightly for context of health insurance rather than treatment choice. The scale has 4 subscales (uncertainty, informed, values clarity and support) with 2 to 3 questions per subscale. Respondents can indicate "yes", "no", or "unsure" for each item. An answer of "yes" receives 0, "unsure" receives 2 and "no" receives 4 points. The sum of the responses to each question within a subscale is normalized to a scale of 25. The subscales are then summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 100 where 0 represents the lowest level of decisional conflict and 100 represents the highest level of decisional conflict.

    within 50 days of the end of the open enrollment period.

  • Satisfaction With the Choice Process

    Response to the question of, "How satisfied are you with the process of choosing a plan?" with 4 potential responses: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied. The count of participants who responded "very satisfied" is reported.

    within 50 days of the end of the open enrollment period

  • Change in Estimated Prescription Drug Spending

    Change in estimated prescription drug spending is the difference in estimated spending in US dollars, including both premiums and out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs, between the participant's 2016 and 2017 plans based on their initial drug list.

    within 50 days of the end of the open enrollment period

Study Arms (3)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study subjects randomized to the control arm will receive information on how to download their prescription drug information from their electronic medical record and will be provided with a list of resources available in the community to help them choose a prescription drug plan.

Behavioral: Usual Care

Expert Recommendation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to the "Expert Recommendation" arm will receive access to a decision support tool that provides personalized expert scores for particular plans based on individual's likely annual out-of-pocket spending, including plan premiums and spending on prescription drugs, and the Medicare star ratings (a measure of customer satisfaction).

Behavioral: Expert Recommendation

Individual Analysis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to "Individual Analysis" arm will receive access to a decision support tool that provides individualized cost information for each plan but not the expert scores for particular plans.

Behavioral: Individual Analysis

Interventions

Decision support tool that provides personalized information on the financial implications of enrolling in different plans and expert recommendations of particular plans.

Expert Recommendation

Decision support tool that provides personalized information on the financial implications of enrolling in different plans.

Individual Analysis
Usual CareBEHAVIORAL

Study subjects randomized to the control arm will receive information on how to download their prescription drug information from their electronic medical record and provided with a list of resources available in the community to help them choose a prescription drug plan.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age66 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The study population included Medicare beneficiaries who received care from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, a large multi-specialty group in the San Francisco Bay Area ages 66-85, one per household enrolled in a Medicare Part D plan in 2016.

You may not qualify if:

  • Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan and/or MediCal

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Linder SK, Swank PR, Vernon SW, Mullen PD, Morgan RO, Volk RJ. Validity of a low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

    PMID: 21300518BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. M. Kate Bundorf
Organization
Stanford University

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2016

First Posted

September 9, 2016

Study Start

September 10, 2016

Primary Completion

January 20, 2017

Study Completion

January 20, 2017

Last Updated

July 23, 2019

Results First Posted

July 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07