NCT02895061

Brief Summary

Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy between daily and pulse oral alfacalcidol treatment of SHPT in chronic hemodialysis patients, a 12-week treatment. Secondary objective was to observe the adverse effects between these two treatment regimens.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
502

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

September 4, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary outcome was the difference of the mean PTH reduction between two groups at the end of the study by unpaired-T test.

    mean PTH reduction between two groups at the end of the study by unpaired-T test.

    12 week

Study Arms (2)

A: Daily

EXPERIMENTAL

A: oral daily alfacalcidol treatments total 6 microgram/week

Drug: Alfacalcidol

B: Pulse

EXPERIMENTAL

B: pulse (trice a week) alfacalcidol treatments total 6 microgram/week

Drug: Alfacalcidol

Interventions

Alfacalcidol 1 microgram/capsule

Also known as: oral daily alfacalcidol treatments total 6 microgram/week
A: DailyB: Pulse

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 y ESRD on HD KT/V ≥ 3.6/wk 2˚HPT Stable in P binder for 4 wk

You may not qualify if:

  • Alfacalcidol allergy Serum Ca ≥ 10.5 mg/dL Serum P ≥ 5.5 mg/dL Pregnancy On phenytoin, phenobarbital

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Gu Y, Ding F, Chen N, Mei CL, Qian JQ, Wang XY, Shi W, Hou FF, Li XW, Wang M, Chen YP. Comparisons between oral pulse alfacalcidol therapy and daily therapy in maintenance hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a randomized, controlled, and multicenter study. Ren Fail. 2005;27(2):205-12.

    PMID: 15807187BACKGROUND
  • Tarrass F, Yazidi A, Sif H, Zamd M, Benghanem MG, Ramdani B. A randomized trial of intermittent versus continuous oral alfacalcidol treatment of hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease. Clin Nephrol. 2006 Jun;65(6):415-8. doi: 10.5414/cnp65415.

  • Llach F, Yudd M. Pathogenic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Oct;32(2 Suppl 2):S3-12. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9808139. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary

Interventions

alfacalcidol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HyperparathyroidismParathyroid DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2016

First Posted

September 9, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Record last verified: 2015-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share