The Effects of Normalizing Blood Pressure on Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypotensive Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Dysregulation of blood pressure (BP), secondary to decentralized autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of the cardiovascular system, often results in chronic hypotension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), particularly in those with high cord lesions (i.e., above T6). While most hypotensive individuals with chronic SCI remain asymptomatic and do not complain of symptoms associated with cerebral hypoperfusion, evidence of reduced resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been reported in association with low systemic BP in the SCI and non-SCI populations. Reduced CBF in hypotensive individuals may lead to cognitive dysfunction, and we reported significantly impaired memory and marginally impaired attention processing in hypotensive individuals with SCI compared to a normotensive SCI cohort. Furthermore, we found that CBF was not increased during cognitive testing in individuals with SCI, which may contribute to impaired cognitive function compared to non-SCI controls. Although asymptomatic hypotension may have an adverse impact on cognitive function and quality of quality of life (QOL) clinical management of this condition is extremely low. In fact, we reported that while nearly 40% of Veterans with SCI were hypotensive, less than 1% carried the diagnosis of hypotension or were prescribed an anti-hypotensive medication. The discrepancy between incidence and treatment of asymptomatic hypotension in the SCI population may relate to a paucity of treatment options which are supported by rigorous clinical trials documenting safe and effective use of anti-hypotensive therapy on BP, CBF and cognitive function. We hypothesize these study medications may increase systolic blood pressure to the normal range and improve cerebral blood flow velocity. Results and conclusions will not be removed from the record.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 1, 2024
September 1, 2024
5 years
August 29, 2016
July 19, 2023
September 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Systolic Blood Pressure
Seated systolic blood pressure following intervention administration.
4 hours
Number of Participants With Normal Blood Pressure Readings
Number of participants with a systolic blood pressure readings between 111-139 mmHg in response to each of the four conditions: 1. Placebo 2. Midodrine 3. Mirabegron 4. Pyridostigmine
4 hours
Study Arms (2)
Study 1
EXPERIMENTALStudy 1: is a dose escalation to determine the individualized dose of each of 3 medications (midodrine, pyridostigmine, mirabegron) that increases SBP into the normal range (111-139 mmHg). The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide and mirabegron.
Study 2
EXPERIMENTALStudy2: is a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded investigation to determine the effect of the normalization of SBP on cerebral blood flow, cognitive function (memory and attention processing) and quality of life. The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide, mirabegron and placebo.
Interventions
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal Cord Injured
- Any level of injury
- Any ASIA grade of SCI
- Primarily wheelchair dependent for mobility
- Duration of injury ˃ 1 year
You may not qualify if:
- Current illness or infection
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia (AD: condition where BP increases)
- More than 3 symptomatic events per week; BP elevations above 140/90 mmHg; adverse symptoms reporting (e.g., light headedness, dizziness, goosebumps, chills, nausea, etc.)
- Diagnosis of hypertension
- History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- Documented history of traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Neurological condition other than SCI (Alzheimer's disease, dementia, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, etc)
- History of epilepsy or other seizure disorder
- Liver or kidney disease
- Bladder problems including blockage of the urine and/or weak urine stream
- Diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
- Diagnosis of artery disease, heart failure, irregular heartbeat, and AV block
- Allergies to aspirin, a yellow dye, pyridostigmine bromide, midodrine hydrochloride, lyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol, hydroxypropyl cellulose, butylated hydroxytoluene, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, yellow ferric oxide, and red ferric oxide
- Had major surgery in the last 30 days
- Illicit drug abuse within the last 6 months
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kessler Foundation Research Center
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
James J Peters VAMC
The Bronx, New York, 10468, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jill Wecht
- Organization
- James J Peters VAMC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jill M Wecht, Ed.D
James J. Peters VA Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Health Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2016
First Posted
September 8, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 1, 2024
Results First Posted
October 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09