Visits Versus Telephone Calls for Postoperative Care
OPTIONs
Outpatient Visits Versus Telephone Interviews for Postoperative Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The OPTIONs study is a randomized controlled, non-inferiority study to evaluate postoperative care using outpatient clinic visits versus telephone calls for women undergoing surgery for pelvic floor disorders. The primary outcome is patient satisfaction using the Surgical-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (S-CAHPS) questionnaire provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Secondary outcomes include safety and cost analysis for patients' direct and indirect medical costs. Women who speak and understand either English or Spanish and planning to undergo an elective surgery for a pelvic disorder will be recruited. Baseline demographics, satisfaction, and cost analysis questionnaires will be acquired pre-operatively. Randomization will be assigned at the time of discharge from the hospital. Patients will either have scheduled clinic visits at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months or telephone calls by a registered nurse at these same intervals. Questionnaires will be completed at 3 months for satisfaction and cost analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 1, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.3 years
August 10, 2016
February 7, 2024
August 21, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction
The objective is to compare patient satisfaction between women who present for clinic postoperative visits versus telephone follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that telephone calls will show non-inferior patient satisfaction when compared to clinic postoperative visits. The investigators will test the working hypothesis by using the approach of randomizing patients undergoing surgery for PFDs to either telephone follow-up or routine outpatient visits for their postoperative care and utilizing the S-CAHPS questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
Preoperative until 3 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events
3 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Outpatient Clinic Visits
ACTIVE COMPARATOROutpatient clinic visits for postoperative care is currently the standard of care. Patients who undergo surgery for a pelvic floor disorder will be scheduled appointments in the outpatient clinic at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months where they will be evaluated by a physician.
Telephone Follow-up
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be called instead of returning to clinic for postoperative care at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.
Interventions
Patients will be called for postoperative care at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months
Patients will return to the clinic at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects ≥ 18 years of age
- Women undergoing surgery for a pelvic floor disorder
- Able to give informed consent
- Has a reliable phone number for contact postoperatively
- Able to speak and understand English or Spanish. Spanish forms will be submitted after initial review of English materials.
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient whose physician decides medical necessity for the patient to have postoperative follow-up in the clinic
- Unable to give written informed consent
- Does not have a reliable phone number
- Inability to speak and understand either English or Spanish. As noted above, Spanish forms will be submitted after initial review of English materials.
- Those who specifically request postoperative clinic visits
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of New Mexico Health Sciences
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Related Publications (11)
Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Oct;15:1-15.
PMID: 26591905BACKGROUNDCortese DA, Korsmo JO. Putting U.S. health care on the right track. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1326-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0907561. Epub 2009 Sep 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 19776399BACKGROUNDPorter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 21142528BACKGROUNDFischer K, Hogan V, Jager A, von Allmen D. Efficacy and utility of phone call follow-up after pediatric general surgery versus traditional clinic follow-up. Perm J. 2015 Winter;19(1):11-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-017.
PMID: 25663201BACKGROUNDRosbe KW, Jones D, Jalisi S, Bray MA. Efficacy of postoperative follow-up telephone calls for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jun;126(6):718-21; discussion 722. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.6.718.
PMID: 10864107BACKGROUNDKimman ML, Dirksen CD, Voogd AC, Falger P, Gijsen BC, Thuring M, Lenssen A, van der Ent F, Verkeyn J, Haekens C, Hupperets P, Nuytinck JK, van Riet Y, Brenninkmeijer SJ, Scheijmans LJ, Kessels A, Lambin P, Boersma LJ. Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT. Eur J Cancer. 2011 May;47(8):1175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
PMID: 21257305BACKGROUNDUppal S, Nadig S, Smith L, Coatesworth AP. A cost-effectiveness analysis of conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004 Jul;86(4):243-6. doi: 10.1308/147870804515.
PMID: 15239863BACKGROUNDGray RT, Sut MK, Badger SA, Harvey CF. Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Ulster Med J. 2010 May;79(2):76-9.
PMID: 21116423BACKGROUNDHwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.
PMID: 23842982BACKGROUNDFallaize RC, Tinline-Purvis C, Dixon AR, Pullyblank AM. Telephone follow-up following office anorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):464-6. doi: 10.1308/003588408X300975. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
PMID: 18598594BACKGROUNDThompson JC, Cichowski SB, Rogers RG, Qeadan F, Zambrano J, Wenzl C, Jeppson PC, Dunivan GC, Komesu YM. Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Oct;30(10):1639-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
PMID: 30783704DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jennifer Thompson
- Organization
- UNewMexico
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rebecca G Rogers, MD
University of New Mexico
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2016
First Posted
September 7, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 1, 2024
Results First Posted
November 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08