NCT02891187

Brief Summary

The OPTIONs study is a randomized controlled, non-inferiority study to evaluate postoperative care using outpatient clinic visits versus telephone calls for women undergoing surgery for pelvic floor disorders. The primary outcome is patient satisfaction using the Surgical-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (S-CAHPS) questionnaire provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Secondary outcomes include safety and cost analysis for patients' direct and indirect medical costs. Women who speak and understand either English or Spanish and planning to undergo an elective surgery for a pelvic disorder will be recruited. Baseline demographics, satisfaction, and cost analysis questionnaires will be acquired pre-operatively. Randomization will be assigned at the time of discharge from the hospital. Patients will either have scheduled clinic visits at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months or telephone calls by a registered nurse at these same intervals. Questionnaires will be completed at 3 months for satisfaction and cost analysis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2016

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2018

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2016

Results QC Date

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 21, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Postoperative CareTelephone follow-upHealthcare Value

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    The objective is to compare patient satisfaction between women who present for clinic postoperative visits versus telephone follow-up. The investigators hypothesize that telephone calls will show non-inferior patient satisfaction when compared to clinic postoperative visits. The investigators will test the working hypothesis by using the approach of randomizing patients undergoing surgery for PFDs to either telephone follow-up or routine outpatient visits for their postoperative care and utilizing the S-CAHPS questionnaire preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.

    Preoperative until 3 months postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse Events

    3 months postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Outpatient Clinic Visits

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Outpatient clinic visits for postoperative care is currently the standard of care. Patients who undergo surgery for a pelvic floor disorder will be scheduled appointments in the outpatient clinic at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months where they will be evaluated by a physician.

Behavioral: Outpatient Clinic Visits

Telephone Follow-up

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be called instead of returning to clinic for postoperative care at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

Behavioral: Telephone follow-up

Interventions

Patients will be called for postoperative care at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months

Telephone Follow-up

Patients will return to the clinic at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months

Outpatient Clinic Visits

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects ≥ 18 years of age
  • Women undergoing surgery for a pelvic floor disorder
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Has a reliable phone number for contact postoperatively
  • Able to speak and understand English or Spanish. Spanish forms will be submitted after initial review of English materials.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any patient whose physician decides medical necessity for the patient to have postoperative follow-up in the clinic
  • Unable to give written informed consent
  • Does not have a reliable phone number
  • Inability to speak and understand either English or Spanish. As noted above, Spanish forms will be submitted after initial review of English materials.
  • Those who specifically request postoperative clinic visits
  • Pregnant patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of New Mexico Health Sciences

Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Oct;15:1-15.

    PMID: 26591905BACKGROUND
  • Cortese DA, Korsmo JO. Putting U.S. health care on the right track. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1326-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0907561. Epub 2009 Sep 23. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19776399BACKGROUND
  • Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21142528BACKGROUND
  • Fischer K, Hogan V, Jager A, von Allmen D. Efficacy and utility of phone call follow-up after pediatric general surgery versus traditional clinic follow-up. Perm J. 2015 Winter;19(1):11-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-017.

    PMID: 25663201BACKGROUND
  • Rosbe KW, Jones D, Jalisi S, Bray MA. Efficacy of postoperative follow-up telephone calls for patients who underwent adenotonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jun;126(6):718-21; discussion 722. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.6.718.

    PMID: 10864107BACKGROUND
  • Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Voogd AC, Falger P, Gijsen BC, Thuring M, Lenssen A, van der Ent F, Verkeyn J, Haekens C, Hupperets P, Nuytinck JK, van Riet Y, Brenninkmeijer SJ, Scheijmans LJ, Kessels A, Lambin P, Boersma LJ. Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT. Eur J Cancer. 2011 May;47(8):1175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

    PMID: 21257305BACKGROUND
  • Uppal S, Nadig S, Smith L, Coatesworth AP. A cost-effectiveness analysis of conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004 Jul;86(4):243-6. doi: 10.1308/147870804515.

    PMID: 15239863BACKGROUND
  • Gray RT, Sut MK, Badger SA, Harvey CF. Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Ulster Med J. 2010 May;79(2):76-9.

    PMID: 21116423BACKGROUND
  • Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.

    PMID: 23842982BACKGROUND
  • Fallaize RC, Tinline-Purvis C, Dixon AR, Pullyblank AM. Telephone follow-up following office anorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):464-6. doi: 10.1308/003588408X300975. Epub 2008 Jul 2.

    PMID: 18598594BACKGROUND
  • Thompson JC, Cichowski SB, Rogers RG, Qeadan F, Zambrano J, Wenzl C, Jeppson PC, Dunivan GC, Komesu YM. Outpatient visits versus telephone interviews for postoperative care: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Oct;30(10):1639-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03895-z. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsPelvic Floor Disorders

Interventions

Ambulatory Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Organization
UNewMexico

Study Officials

  • Rebecca G Rogers, MD

    University of New Mexico

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2016

First Posted

September 7, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

January 1, 2018

Last Updated

November 1, 2024

Results First Posted

November 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations