Innovative Behavioral Economics Incentives Strategies for Health
IBIS-Health
Innovative Incentive Strategies for Sustainable HIV Testing and Antiretroviral Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
3,580
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The success of combination HIV prevention efforts, including HIV treatment as prevention, hinges on universal, routine HIV testing with effective treatment after HIV diagnosis. The proposed study will evaluate the comparative effectiveness and sustainability of innovative incentive strategies, informed directly by behavioral economics and decision psychology, to promote HIV testing among men and HIV treatment among HIV-infected adults in rural Uganda.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 3, 2020
CompletedFebruary 24, 2022
February 1, 2022
3.4 years
August 10, 2016
February 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of participants who receive an HIV test at a community health campaign between intervention groups
Aim 1 (IBIS HIV Testing Trial) primary outcome
6-8 weeks after enrollment; annually
Proportion of participants with HIV RNA <400 copies/mL between intervention groups
Aim 2 (IBIS Treatment Trial) primary outcome
6 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants randomized to loss aversion trial who make a deposit
Aim 3 Pilot (IBIS Repeat HIV Testing Trial) primary outcome
At enrollment
Proportion of participants who complete all HIV retest visits at study venue
Aim 3 Trial (IBIS Repeat HIV Testing Trial) primary outcome
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Proportion of participants who have HIV positive result between intervention groups
6-8 weeks after enrollment; annually
Proportion of participants who receive an HIV test at a testing site between intervention groups
1-3 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants who retest for HIV at study venue at 3 months
3-4 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants who retest for HIV at study venue at 6 months
6-7 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants who retest for HIV at 3 months among those who made deposits
3-4 months after enrollment
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (11)
Aim 1 - Fixed Incentive
ACTIVE COMPARATORFixed Incentive - Prize Prize incentive - Low Prize incentive - High
Aim 1 - Loss Aversion
EXPERIMENTALLoss Aversion - Prize Prize incentive - Low Prize incentive - High
Aim 1 - Lottery
EXPERIMENTALLottery - Prize Prize incentive - Low Prize incentive - High
Aim 2 - Standard Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard care Travel voucher
Aim 2 - Enhanced Care (Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALEscalating payment incentive Travel voucher
Aim 3 Pilot - Loss Aversion
EXPERIMENTALLoss Aversion - Deposit
Aim 3 Pilot - Fixed Incentive
EXPERIMENTALFixed Incentive - Voucher
Aim 3 Pilot - No incentive
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be encouraged to come for repeat HIV testing, but no incentive will be offered.
Aim 3 Trial - Loss Aversion
EXPERIMENTALLoss Aversion - Deposit
Aim 3 Trial - Fixed Incentive
EXPERIMENTALFixed Incentive - Voucher
Aim 3 Trial - No incentive
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be encouraged to come for repeat HIV testing, but no incentive will be offered.
Interventions
Low expected prize value.
High expected prize value.
The incentives will increase in value when participants are found to meet the pre-specified virologic suppression criteria at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. If the virologic threshold for an incentive is missed at the 6 week or 3 month time-point, the subsequent incentive for an undetectable HIV viral load will be reset to the initial incentive value.
Travel voucher to assist with linkage to care.
Includes HIV viral load and treatment adherence counseling.
Men are informed that if they come for HIV testing, they will receive a specific prize (gain framing). The prize will be an item worth the same amount in US dollars as loss aversion and the expected value of a lottery prize. This gain-framed incentive resembles the form that incentives usually take in most studies and serves as a comparison to the lottery-based and loss-framed incentives.
The prizes are worth approximately the same amount as the fixed incentive and expected value of a lottery prize. At the time of randomization, study staff will inform the participant that he has won a prize. Staff will ask the participant to choose a specific prize from several choices, and then provide an opportunity for the participant to see the prize. Study staff will then tell participants that they will lose the prize if they do not participate in HIV testing. In this way, the incentive is framed as a loss rather than a gain, thereby leveraging loss aversion while not requiring men in very low-income settings to experience an actual loss.
Men are entered in a lottery that offers a chance to win high-value prizes after testing for HIV at a community health campaign. Staff will emphasize that only those who come for HIV testing will be entered into the lottery and that not everyone will win a prize. Participants were informed at enrollment about the list of prizes and corresponding probabilities of winning them, in terms that are understandable to men with low numeracy (e.g., "1 in 20" rather than 5%). The probabilities of winning prizes varied between 1-5%, with higher value prizes having lower probability.
A standard gain-framed incentive arm in which participants will be offered a voucher for coming for a repeat HIV test in the future.
A loss-aversion framed incentive in which participants will be asked to voluntarily make a deposit that can be retrieved, with interest on the deposit, if they come for an HIV test in the future (i.e. for repeat testing)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male
- ≥18 years
- Resident (≥6 months) in one of 4 study communities
You may not qualify if:
- Plan to move \<6 months from study start
- AIM 2 - TREATMENT TRIAL
- ≥18 years
- Resident (≥6 months) in one of 4 study communities
- HIV positive
- Plan to move \<6 months from study start
- AIM 3 - REPEAT TESTING PILOT
- HIV-negative by rapid HIV antibody testing at pilot trial baseline,
- Ages 18 - 59 years old,
- Attendee of high-risk site of HIV acquisition (e.g. bars, trading centers, etc.) in the region
- Intention to move away from the community in the 3 months from time of recruitment
- AIM 3 - REPEAT TESTING TRIAL
- HIV-negative by rapid HIV antibody testing at time of recruitment,
- Ages 18 - 59 years old,
- Reported willingness to retest for HIV in the six months following recruitment,
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Franciscolead
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
- Makerere Universitycollaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
Mbarara, Uganda
Related Publications (11)
Chamie G, Schaffer EM, Ndyabakira A, Emperador DM, Kwarisiima D, Camlin CS, Havlir DV, Kahn JG, Kamya MR, Thirumurthy H. Comparative effectiveness of novel nonmonetary incentives to promote HIV testing. AIDS. 2018 Jul 17;32(11):1443-1451. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001833.
PMID: 29683850RESULTThirumurthy H, Ndyabakira A, Marson K, Emperador D, Kamya M, Havlir D, Kwarisiima D, Chamie G. Financial incentives for achieving and maintaining viral suppression among HIV-positive adults in Uganda: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2019 Mar;6(3):e155-e163. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30330-8. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
PMID: 30660594RESULTNdyabakira A, Chamie G, Emperador D, Marson K, Kamya MR, Havlir DV, Kwarisiima D, Thirumurthy H. Men's Beliefs About the Likelihood of Serodiscordance in Couples with an HIV-Positive Partner: Survey Evidence from Rural Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2020 Mar;24(3):967-974. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02531-7.
PMID: 31073946RESULTNdyabakira A, Getahun M, Byamukama A, Emperador D, Kabageni S, Marson K, Kwarisiima D, Chamie G, Thirumurthy H, Havlir D, Kamya MR, Camlin CS. Leveraging incentives to increase HIV testing uptake among men: qualitative insights from rural Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1763. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8073-6.
PMID: 31888589RESULTSchaffer EM, Gonzalez JM, Wheeler SB, Kwarisiima D, Chamie G, Thirumurthy H. Promoting HIV Testing by Men: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences and Predict Uptake of Community-based Testing in Uganda. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):413-432. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00549-5.
PMID: 31981135RESULTChamie G, Ndyabakira A, Marson KG, Emperador DM, Kamya MR, Havlir DV, Kwarisiima D, Thirumurthy H. A pilot randomized trial of incentive strategies to promote HIV retesting in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233600. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32470089RESULTKavanagh NM, Schaffer EM, Ndyabakira A, Marson K, Havlir DV, Kamya MR, Kwarisiima D, Chamie G, Thirumurthy H. Planning prompts to promote uptake of HIV services among men: a randomised trial in rural Uganda. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11):e003390. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003390.
PMID: 33257417RESULTMarson K, Ndyabakira A, Kwarisiima D, Camlin CS, Kamya MR, Havlir D, Thirumurthy H, Chamie G. HIV retesting and risk behaviors among high-risk, HIV-uninfected adults in Uganda. AIDS Care. 2021 May;33(5):675-681. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2020.1842319. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PMID: 33172300RESULTChamie G, Napierala S, Agot K, Thirumurthy H. HIV testing approaches to reach the first UNAIDS 95% target in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet HIV. 2021 Apr;8(4):e225-e236. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00023-0.
PMID: 33794183RESULTChamie G, Kwarisiima D, Ndyabakira A, Marson K, Camlin CS, Havlir DV, Kamya MR, Thirumurthy H. Financial incentives and deposit contracts to promote HIV retesting in Uganda: A randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2021 May 4;18(5):e1003630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003630. eCollection 2021 May.
PMID: 33945526RESULTCamlin CS, Marson K, Ndyabakira A, Getahun M, Emperador D, Byamukama A, Kwarisiima D, Thirumurthy H, Chamie G. Understanding the role of incentives for achieving and sustaining viral suppression: A qualitative sub-study of a financial incentives trial in Uganda. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270180. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35749510DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabriel Chamie, MD, MPH
University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harsha Thirumurthy, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2016
First Posted
September 7, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 21, 2019
Study Completion
January 3, 2020
Last Updated
February 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
N/A. Individual data may be made available upon request.