A Pilot Study Evaluating Go NAP SACC's Web-based Nutrition Tool for Child Care
Evaluation of Go NAP SACC: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Nutrition Tool of the Web-based Tool Based on the NAP SACC Program
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of Go NAP SACC (Get online with Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care), a suite of web-based tools designed to help child care programs improve their nutrition environment (specifically classrooms serving 3-5 year olds) over the course of 4 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2016
CompletedFebruary 17, 2017
February 1, 2017
1 year
August 26, 2016
February 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in EPAO-SR Scores from Baseline to Post-intervention
Nutrition-related environmental characteristics will be assessed using the EPAO-SR, integrating data from the center director, child care teachers, and trained staff (reviewing policy documents).Data from all components is used in scoring. Item responses are used to derive variables assessing compliance with 42 nutrition best practices (BPs). Each nutrition BP variable is scored on a 4-point scale (0-3), where higher scores indicate closer BP compliance. Nutrition BP variables are then sorted into one of 7 environmental components: foods provided (12), beverages provided (5), feeding practices (8), feeding environment (8), menus (1), education \& professional development (6), or policy (1). Environmental summary scores are calculated by averaging scores from relevant nutrition BP variables; hence, summary scores range from 0 to 3. An overall nutrition score is calculated by summing the 7 environmental summary scores; hence overall nutrition scores range from 0 to 21.
Measures collected at baseline (2-4 weeks prior to the intervention) and post-intervention (1-3 weeks following the intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALCenters in this group will be granted immediate access to the Go NAP SACC website following randomization with minimal support from a local technical assistance provider. The center director will have 4 months to use Go NAPSACC tools.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONDuring the study, centers in this group will receive no intervention. However, they will be granted delayed access to the Go NAP SACC website and technical assistance support after post-intervention measures are collected.
Interventions
Go NAP SACC is a suite of online tools designed to help child care programs improve their nutrition environment. Tools include: self-assessment, goal setting, action planning, and tips and materials. In addition to these online tools, local technical assistance providers offer center directors an orientation on how to use Go NAP SACC and minimal ongoing technical assistance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child Care Centers must have a quality rating of 2-5 stars OR be licensed as GS110-106 (faith-based and exempt from rating), serve lunch and a snack, and have 3-4 year old classrooms and 2 preschool teacher willing to participate.
- Teachers must teach in the 3-4 year old classrooms.
- Center directors and teachers must be able to read English.
You may not qualify if:
- Child Care Centers cannot have participated in NAP SACC within the last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ward DS, Vaughn AE, Mazzucca S, Burney R. Translating a child care based intervention for online delivery: development and randomized pilot study of Go NAPSACC. BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4898-z.
PMID: 29162057DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dianne S Ward, EdD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2016
First Posted
September 5, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share