Fully Automated Anesthesia, Analgesia and Fluid Management
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluate the feasibility and quality of automated anesthesia, analgesia and fluid management based on a combination of several physiological variables (bispectral index \[BIS\], stroke volume \[SV\], and stroke volume variation \[SVV\]) using 2 independent physiologic closed-loop systems (PCLS) in patients undergoing high risk vascular surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 4, 2017
January 1, 2017
3 months
August 29, 2016
January 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of adequate anesthesia defined as a BIS between between 40 and 60, a SVV < 13% and/or cardiac index > 2.5 litre/min/m² for more/equal of 85% of the surgical time
at time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Drug consumption: remifentanil dose
at time of surgery
Drug consumption: propofol dose
at time of surgery
amount of fluid given
at time of surgery
number of automatic modifications of the propofol and remifentanil concentrations
at time of surgery
number of patients movements
at time of surgery
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
high risk vascular surgery
EXPERIMENTALPatients scheduled for high risk vascular surgery under automated total closed loop intravenous anesthesia and fluid management
Interventions
Closed loop for propofol and remifentanil using BIS XP TM, Covidien, Ireland
Closed loop for fluid perfusion using EV-1000 TM, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients scheduled for high risk vascular surgery
- Patients American Society Anesthesiologist classification: 3 or 4
You may not qualify if:
- age less than 18 years,
- patients with arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation
- allergy to latex, propofol, remifentanil, morphine, muscle relaxant or any of the excipients,
- pregnant woman
- combined general and regional anesthesia,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Erasme University Hospitallead
- Hopital Fochcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Erasme University Hospital
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luc Barvais, MD PhD
Erasme University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and head of the cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Clinics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2016
First Posted
September 1, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01