NCT02879370

Brief Summary

The technique the investigators propose to perform colorectal and colo-anal anastomosis in patients underwent low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially reduce the anastomotic leakage rate by better trans-anal introduction of the circular stapler, elimination of the previous suture lines and dog ears, combined with direct inspection of the anastomosis, easy performance of trans-anal air leak tests and eventually direct repair of any small anastomotic defects. Another important point in cancer surgery is the easily identification of the distal margin. In fact, this technique is simple to perform, reproducible and safe in terms of complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

November 24, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Anastomotic LeakRectal cancerDouble stapling technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of anastomotic leakage after intervention

    The authors adapted these criteria for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage; fecal material from the drain or the wound, extravasation of dye on contrast enema, anastomotic defect visualized by colonoscopy, or the presence of peri-anastomotic air or fluid visualized by CT scan.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety margin after tumor resection

    1 year

  • Postoperative morbidities and mortalities

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

TICRANT

EXPERIMENTAL

Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis

Procedure: Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis

Interventions

Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME), either performed open, laparoscopic or robotic Closure of the rectum with linear or curved stapler with transanal inspection Transanal placement of four 2-0 prolene sutures on the rectal stump, respectively 2 at the extremities of the suture line (left and right) and other two 1 cm medial to each of the previous two sutures Circular stapler is introduced, the 4 tails of the prolene stitches are introduced through the windows (2 in the left and 2 in the right side of the instrument) and gently pulled, to obtain a gradual and homogeneous traction of the tissue and elimination of both previous suture lines and doggy ears, then the stapler is fired The termino-terminal anastomosis is carefully inspected A leak test can be performed (if negative the protective stoma is not performed) An eventual leak can be transanally repaired

TICRANT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing low or ultra-low anterior resection for biopsy proven primary rectal cancer

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years old,
  • pregnant,
  • recurrent disease,
  • cancer less than 4 cm from the anal verge,
  • abdomeno-perineal resection,
  • emergency surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Rome Tor Vergata

Rome, RM, 00133, Italy

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x.

    PMID: 9718009BACKGROUND
  • Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):360-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x.

    PMID: 11260099BACKGROUND
  • Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M, Herfarth C, Heuschen G. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):207-16. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00008.

    PMID: 11807360BACKGROUND
  • Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Reymond MA, Reck T, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Barlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s004649901064.

    PMID: 10384066BACKGROUND
  • Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD, Wolff S, Nestler G, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Sep;45(9):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9.

    PMID: 12352230BACKGROUND
  • Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E, Msika S, Flamant Y. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1999 May;125(5):529-35.

    PMID: 10330942BACKGROUND
  • Moran BJ. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1996 Jul;83(7):902-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830707.

    PMID: 8813772BACKGROUND
  • Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):929-33.

    PMID: 9449446BACKGROUND
  • Selvasekar CR, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Harrington JR, Harmsen WS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):956-62; discussion 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.044.

    PMID: 17481518BACKGROUND
  • Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003.

    PMID: 10024097BACKGROUND
  • Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Aug;185(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00018-5.

    PMID: 9249076BACKGROUND
  • Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery--are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jul;38(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02048029.

    PMID: 7607032BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anastomotic LeakRectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsColorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Francesco Crafa, MD

    San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Giovanni Romano, MD

    Fondazione G. Pascale

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Jacques Megevand, MD

    Pavia University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, FACS Assistant Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2014

First Posted

August 25, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

May 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Locations