NCT02877888

Brief Summary

Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among 6year old school children stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. Professional fluoride varnish application has become popular as variety of studies has found that it is an efficient method in reducing dental caries. The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children. Aim of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 6 monthly application of sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of dental caries in permanent incisors and molars in children between 6 and 7 years in a suburban setting in Sri Lanka. This will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. A sample of school children (6-7 years) will be randomized into varnish and control groups. All the children will receive routine caries preventive measures of oral hygiene instructions, dietary advice and professional cleaning. Children in varnish group will receive fluoride varnish professionally applied after prophylaxis every 6 months. Clinical examinations of all children will be performed at the beginning of the study and 1 year and 2 years later. All the caries at the dentinal level of both groups will be stabilized with temporary restorations at the beginning. During this period, each school will be visited four times at 6-month interval for recruitment, dental examinations, and fluoride varnish applications. Recruited children will be randomly assigned to either a treatment (5% NaF varnish) or a control group. Caries examinations will be conducted using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The cost for the dental team's school visits; cost involved in the treatment of dental caries throughout the course of the study in both groups will be evaluated and compared at the end of the study. The sample size is calculated as 160 each arm to detect 5% caries change with 80% power. Analysis The effect of intervention will be measured by number of caries prevented. New caries in the usual care and intervention group will be calculated after the completion of the study. The costs for intervention will be estimated. The costs will be estimated for the dental material, time for human resources and indirect costs.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
320

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Typical duration for phase_1

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 11, 2016

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

August 11, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

cost effectivenessfluoride varnishdental caries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • number of caries prevented in the intervention and control gropus

    Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and the mean number of new dental caries atdifferent points are shown in table 3. Table 3: Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and new dental caries at different time points Period Mean number of dental caries in the Intervention Group Mean number of dental caries in the Control Group p value# 2015 May 0.94 1.79 \<0.001 2015 Dec 1.69 1.77 \<0.001 2016 Nov 1.50 1.97 \<0.001 #Mann-Whitney U test

    every 6 months for 2 years

  • Relationship of quality of life of children with dental caries and without dental caries

    The total sample consisted of 321 students, with 161 and 162 in control and intervention groups respectively. Mean number of caries was significantly high among those who had difficulty in chewing, difficulty in vigorous chewing, difficulty in taking hot or cold food. Percentage of students with at least one dental caries at the beginning of the study was compared between different variables. If a student had at least one tooth with dental caries, was taken as positive for dental caries. Of the total population 115 (65.7%) of the students in the 6 age group had at least one tooth with dental caries and equal proportion was found among those who were more than six years as well. Difficulty in chewing (\<0.001), difficulty chewing vigorously (\<0.001), difficulty taking cold or hot food (\<0.001) and difficulty taking sweets (0.034) were experienced more by the students who had at least one dental caries.

    at the beginning of study after examination

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Independent association between vanish intervention and new dental caries

    every 6 months for 2 years

Study Arms (2)

drug fluoride varnish /strength 22600ppm

EXPERIMENTAL

intervention: drug :fluoride varnish 22600ppm topical application every 6 months for a total period of 2 years

Drug: fluoride varnish 22600ppm

placebo comparator

NO INTERVENTION

placebo:use of routine dental advice

Interventions

topical application on teeth every 6months

Also known as: 5% duraphat
drug fluoride varnish /strength 22600ppm

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children with at least one permanent tooth present.
  • Age 6 to 7 years. Children under 6 years of age may be enrolled in the study if at least one permanent tooth has erupted.
  • Residing in Kurunegala municipal council region and tap water is consumed (fluoride levels in drinking water is normal).
  • Parental consent must be provided. If the parent is not the primary caregiver, a legal guardian or a family member who is the primary care provider must sign the consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. (These children will be referred for treatment.)
  • No permanent teeth present or stainless steel crowns only.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (15)

  • American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):40-3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19216381BACKGROUND
  • Gugwad SC, Shah P, Lodaya R, Bhat C, Tandon P, Choudhari S, Patil S. Caries prevention effect of intensive application of sodium fluoride varnish in molars in children between age 6 and 7 years. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):408-13. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1068.

    PMID: 22269229BACKGROUND
  • Liu BY, Lo EC, Chu CH, Lin HC. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. J Dent Res. 2012 Aug;91(8):753-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512452278. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

    PMID: 22736448BACKGROUND
  • Chu CH, Lo E. Uses of sodium fluoride varnish in dental practice. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2008 Jun;19:58-61.

    PMID: 19728633BACKGROUND
  • Tickle M, Milsom KM, Donaldson M, Killough S, O'Neill C, Crealey G, Sutton M, Noble S, Greer M, Worthington HV. Protocol for Northern Ireland Caries Prevention in Practice Trial (NIC-PIP) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the effects and costs of a dental caries prevention regime for young children attending primary care dental services. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Oct 10;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-27.

    PMID: 21985746BACKGROUND
  • Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Linsenmeyar KA, Williams A, Mouradian W. Preventive dental care for children in the United States: a national perspective. Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):e544-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1958.

    PMID: 17332174BACKGROUND
  • Greig V, Conway DI. Fluoride varnish was effective at reducing caries on high caries risk school children in rural Brazil. Evid Based Dent. 2012;13(3):78-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400874.

    PMID: 23059920BACKGROUND
  • Bali RK, Mathur VB, Talwar PP, Chanana HB. National Oral Health Survey and Fluoride Mapping, 2002-2003, India. Delhi: Dental Council of India; 2004

    BACKGROUND
  • Child Dental Health Survey 2013: England, Wales and Nothern Ireland 2013

    BACKGROUND
  • State Oral Health Surveys. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018

    BACKGROUND
  • Chu CH, Lo EC. A review of sodium fluoride varnish. Gen Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;54(4):247-53.

  • Dimitropoulos Y, Holden A, Gwynne K, Irving M, Binge N, Blinkhorn A. An assessment of strategies to control dental caries in Aboriginal children living in rural and remote communities in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0643-y.

  • James P, Parnell C, Whelton H. The caries-preventive effect of chlorhexidine varnish in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Caries Res. 2010;44(4):333-40. doi: 10.1159/000315346. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

  • Moberg Skold U, Petersson LG, Lith A, Birkhed D. Effect of school-based fluoride varnish programmes on approximal caries in adolescents from different caries risk areas. Caries Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(4):273-9. doi: 10.1159/000084833.

  • Neidell M, Shearer B, Lamster IB. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Dental Sealants versus Fluoride Varnish in a School-Based Setting. Caries Res. 2016;50 Suppl 1:78-82. doi: 10.1159/000439091. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Interventions

sodium fluoride topical preparation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
senior lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2016

First Posted

August 24, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 30, 2018

Study Completion

November 1, 2018

Last Updated

December 12, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12